File: Zeitgeist_Movement_Understandings.swf-(1 .03 MB, 800x600, Other)
[_] Anon 3476766

File: Zeitgeist_Movement_Understandings.swf-(1 .03 MB, 800x600, Other)
[_] Anon 3473407

File: Zeitgeist_Movement_Understandings.swf-(1 .03 MB, 800x600, Other)
[_] Anon 3471345

File: phpB8.swf-(1.03 MB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1951164
>> [_] Anon 1951168 You do realize that as little as 7 people or less is actually going to consider taking interests in your little cult right?
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951171 >># Science is communism, and science is religion. I agree with you, zeitgeist is a cult.
>> [_] Anon 1951178 >># Yet the people who are truly part of it don't want anyone to think of zeitgeist movement as a cult so why do you insist on presenting it as such?
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951183 >># That doesn't make any sense. if zeitgeist is a cult, it is a cult, if zeitgeist is not a cult, it is not a cult. My actions cannot make the zeitgeist movement into a cult if it's not.
>> [_] Anon 1951184 >># Seven?! I'm sure zitgeist-chan would continue on his noble quest in the face of adversity if only one person were enlightened! Ganbatte, zitgeist-chan!
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951188 I wrote this up for the stuff earlier today but it lapsed before I could post it. https://www.facebook.com/htdghdr.grsdgrs dhrsd >His personal profile https://www.facebook.com/pages/Zeitgeist -Posters/431882220198401 >His page with some of his work, 2.9K photos last time I checked https://www.facebook.com/groups/13847691 5229/ >Zeitshit group he's a part of https://www.facebook.com/masongarthjames lee >Gets some help from this guy, also he's an admin in the facebook group. Other tidbits I've picked up: No job. Uses Telstra wireless. Others in the group refer to each other as "Geisters". Prints all his posters at a job center. IP address on November 16th and 20th 2012 was 150.101.81.66, traces back to internode ADSL (eth7747.sa in Adelaide) at the moment. Fairly sure he's in Adelaide as he puts up a shit-ton of posters at the university there, but there's a chance he might be in Melbourne.
>> [_] Anon 1951190 >># >some deluded australian aspie in a cult How does this not surprise me Get your shit together, Australia
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951191 >># Where's your point?
>> [_] Anon 1951192 >># What's* Now go the fuck away you aussie aspie, no one cares about your cult Try some mental illness forums, I bet some people will find it interesting
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951194 >># ad hominem fallacy
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951195 >># Still, ad hominem fallacies.
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951196 >># Give me your real name and address you faggot, I'll give you a point.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951197 >># AD HOMINEM FALLACIES.
>> [_] Anon 1951198 >># What? Your "flash" is nothing that is contributive to the website but appealing to those with mental illnesses, despite the fact that yourself have a mental illness, by posting this here numerous times, over a long period of time, trying to appeal to teens and young adults. Have YOU checked your mental status?
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951199 >># You say that like you're not an asshole. >protip, you are
>> [_] Anon 1951200 >># >My actions cannot make the zeitgeist movement into a cult if it's not. But your actions can make it appear as a cult even if it's not. By constantly pushing your ideals on people instead of letting them discover it for themselves, you make it appear as if the movement is desperately looking for followers as if it's not satisfied with the one it already has, and truth be told, your actions only serves as to antagonize your cause and thus pushes away any potential followers.
>> [_] Anon 1951201 >># Don't worry about things that don't concern you. This was not intended for you.
>> [_] Jesus Zeitgeist Christ 1951202 >># LOL, you got that IP from 4chan vs. Zeitgeist.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951203 >># ad hominem fallacy
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951204 >># Still, ad hominem fallacy. >># As I mentioned in the thread on /q/ sometime ago: If market advocates hate people who are anti-trade as in they advocate open source, then they are going to hate the zeitgeist movement, sooner or later.
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951205 >># Yep. You were stupid enough to give it out for some reason. >b-but I don't have that one any more Nope. Nothing stopping me from forging some law enforcement CP bullshit and getting more info about it, though. >># Prove me wrong then.
>> [_] Anon 1951206 >># thx m8, ur doing god's work Tbh though I think most people see through his bullshit.
>> [_] Anon 1951207 This single flash contains more worth than all of 4chan. Learn what a cult is, you fucking retards. This is not a cult, and there's nothing inherently wrong with this. It's important, though, to the progress of the human race, that concentrations camps be built to exterminate all the people that come to 4chan.
>> [_] Anon 1951208 >># FYI, aussie unis have a lot of fringe movements that no one really gives two shits about. Like at mine there's a communist party club that always hands out fliers, but mostly get avoided.
>> [_] Anon 1951209 >># It's a little silly to call it an ad hominem, since we're not debating. We're not trying to prove anything logically, we're just desperately trying to get rid of an unwanted pest, using any technique that has a chance of working.
>> [_] Anon 1951210 >># Shush, aspie. Shush.
>> [_] Anon 1951211 >># >As I mentioned in the thread on /q/ sometime ago: >If market advocates hate people who are anti-trade as in they advocate open source, then they are going to hate the zeitgeist movement, sooner or later. Then you should try your best to avoid a lot of that hate by "NOT" overwhelming the market advocates with your ideals
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951212 >># I posted that IP when my computer was turned off and I didn't have a internet connection at home. So... hmmm... your move? Prove you wrong about what? I was pointing out your ad hominem fallacies: Appealing to personal considerations (rather than to fact or reason). >># hmmm zeitgeist doesn't plan to build concentration camps...
>> [_] Anon 1951214 >># ..have you thought that one through?
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951215 >># ad hominem fallacy >># ad hominem fallacy >># Why would I be sensitive towards market or trade advocates if I believe they're liars?
>> [_] Anon 1951217 >># TBH I think everyone sees through his bullshit. I'm not afraid of innocent minds being corrupted, I'm afraid of people that don't care being continually bothered.
>> [_] Anon 1951218 >># >Why would I be sensitive towards market or trade advocates if I believe they're liars? Because it doesn't just hurt you, it hurts your movement, hurts the chances of you gaining more supporters, and possibly takes away the supporters you already have.
>> [_] Anon 1951220 >># > if I believe they're liars? Justify that.
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951221 >># >I posted that IP when my computer was turned off and I didn't have a internet connection at home. So... hmmm... your move? I don't fucking care if it was your home IP or not, you were posting from it. I don't care if it was the library I know you sometimes use, or you were leeching someone's wifi, or it was a public hotspot, or whatever, You were posting from it, you were physically present there at the time. >Prove you wrong about what? I was pointing out your ad hominem fallacies: And I was pointing out the fact that you're an asshole. The fact that you keep shitting up /f/ and won't stop unless you're made to. The fact that you keep coming here and posting four fucking flashes when you know it's not welcome.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951223 >># Mainly, ad hominem fallacies. I can't address this. Physically present at a computer? Wow, that's creepy yet should I be flattered that you want to "internet stalk" me? >># Trade and property are promoted as honest concepts by market advocates, when in reality property is a covert form of violence which requires deception.
>> [_] Anon 1951225 >># >when in reality property is a covert form of violence which requires deception. Expand on that, it sounds baseless.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951227 >># I don't fear this. >># the zeitgeist movement has members, so I'm glad there's some who don't.
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951228 >># >Wow, that's creepy yet should I be flattered that you want to "internet stalk" me? Well considering you use a fake name on facebook I'm guessing you don't want people knowing who you really are. You knew this was coming. As for stalking? Well I guess, I want to find out who you really are, and have a go at you with a hammer. I'd say 'break your fingers with a hammer' like that other anon did, but I'm guessing that won't stop you.
>> [_] Anon 1951230 >># ad hominem fallacy, beneath this mask there is more than flesh, beneath this mask there is an idea mr. creedy and ideas are bulletproof.
>> [_] Anon 1951231 >># Please answer the question stated in >>#
>> [_] Anon 1951232 ad hominem is zitgeist-chan's word of the day! He's so happy he can use it in a sentence! His vocabulary studies have paid off! Ganbatte, zitgeist-chan!
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951234 >># in my area, there is a mansion right next to a train station and it is offensive as you can see smaller less confrontational housing. If that's not covert violence, I do not know what it is.
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951236 >># >ideas are bulletproof I'd like to make this clear. I don't care for zeitgeist either way. What people (including you, you cum-guzzling faggot) want to believe is the correct solution for societies problems is their business, weather it be god, zeitgeist, more politicians, or whatever. I just want to fuck you up because you won't stop flooding /f/ is all. Not your ideology.
>> [_] Anon 1951237 >># Ooh that sounded so badass. I'm totally wet for you!
>> [_] Anon 1951239 >># Covert violence is destroying the peace of an online forum to promote your ideas.
>> [_] Anon 1951240 >># >less confrontational housing. >If that's not covert violence, I do not know what it is. This seems subjective, how have you backed your opinion with some sort of study?
>> [_] Anon 1951241 >># that sounds like that feminist thingy with them being raped just by a look
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951242 >># ad hominem fallacy. Obviously you are deranged by the idea of doing divine justice, like Kira in Death Note. Just write my name in a book and count 45 seconds.
>> [_] Anon 1951243 >># >># You should stop yelling at him and just ask him questions, it's far more effective.
>> [_] Anon 1951245 so much ad hominem fallacy in this thread. i feel like i'm in the real life again
>> [_] Anon 1951248 >># Please don't bring feminism into the discussion /v/.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951250 >># I admit to you, I'm not a scientist, yet my personal contention is that a competitive society is structurally unfair towards the people as the rich vs. poor senario is not an anomaly in a trade or market society, it is in fact the very basis. Which then falls to market advocates to justify corruption with the confusion and nonsense talk of monetary-economics, appeals to "human nature" and "eugenics" I hate the market and trade, and I blame myself and everyone for supporting such a monster
>> [_] Anon 1951253 >># You are not a scientist nor appear to have any sort of study related to the phenomena you're describing (I'm assuming). Is there any way you could improve the credibility of your statements? >I hate the market and trade, and I blame myself and everyone for supporting such a monster This statement seems rather emotional, but not very helpful, do you have any points that have more substance?
>> [_] Anon 1951257 The other day I was talking with friends in a coffee shop when a stranger sat down at our table. He started talking so loudly I missed some of the conversation I wanted to hear. I tried ignoring him, but he wouldn't go away. I tried asking him to leave, civilly expressing my dissapproval, and joking with him, but he never left. He came back to the table several times on different days. I am not talking to zitgeist-chan, only to the other people at the table: How is zitgeist-chan different from the stranger in the coffee shop? Why does he deserve more respect?
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951258 >># What exact statement do you want me to expand on? to go into property more there's the movie I submitted to 4chan in parts called LORD OF WAR. with the belief in property comes the belief in defending such property and the obsession with gaining more property. So the biggest scam artist on the planet is nicolas cage in lord of war as he keeps selling the weapons people think they need to continue the acts of property war. "that's the secret to survival, never go to war, especially with yourself" -lord of war. I've done a lot of investigation regarding the anti-zeitgeist perspective vs. the zeitgeist perspective. I've found pro-zeitgeist videos are more reasonable, yet anti-zeitgeist are derogatory, and mainly their argument against zeitgeist has been ad hominem.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951259 >># poor example, you don't need to be in the loud zeitgeist conversation comments section which you don't want to talk about.
>> [_] Anon 1951262 >># You spammed four flashes, and four a few hours ago. You bumped off flashes I'm interested in.
>> [_] Anon 1951263 >># I'm not complaining about this one thread, I"m complaining about the flooding and spamming practices that show a clear disrespect to /f/, as f4r stated.
>> [_] Anon 1951265 >># >with the belief in property comes the belief in defending such property and the obsession with gaining more property. Isn't that what they call the slippery slope fallacy? >So the biggest scam artist on the planet is nicolas cage in lord of war I seriously hope you don't base your ideological struggle based on a piece of entertainment ... that would be questionable, to say the least. >I've done a lot of investigation regarding the anti-zeitgeist perspective vs. the zeitgeist perspective. Prove it. >I've done a lot of investigation regarding the anti-zeitgeist perspective vs. the zeitgeist perspective. I'll take what is "anecdotal evidence" and "bias reinforcement" for $400.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951266 >># they're not gone at all, they're on swfchan They would be in the most recent.
>> [_] Anon 1951268 >># You've incurred a cost(time and convenience) on people who expect certain content on /f/. You also mistag and obfuscate the names of your flashes. Isn't this not violence?
>> [_] Anon 1951270 >># Do hurry up, I await your replies. I dare say I am almost enjoying them.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951274 >># Commonly when people WANT zeitgeist to be wrong, they'll be dismissive of any argument I give, no matter the context, the evidence or what have you. In a peer reviewed situation I imagine the burden of proof comes from all angles, not just mine. Yet if you believe zeitgeist is wrong no matter what I say, then there's no way I can argue with you when I say my most basic statements. Monetary economics is a religion Trade and property are covert forms of violence Open source is good for public health Competition in any form is bad for public health are some examples
>> [_] Anon 1951275 >># >they'll be dismissive of any argument I give, no matter the context, the evidence or what have you. So I assume you have no evidence to provide aside from the lack of effort on your part then? >In a peer reviewed situation I imagine the burden of proof comes from all angles, not just mine. I am sorry, the burden of proof belongs to the claimant. Doubly so when it comes to scientific studies. >Monetary economics is a religion >Trade and property are covert forms of violence >Open source is good for public health >Competition in any form is bad for public health These are unsupported claims, please prove them. I await your replies warmly.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951276 >># The content on /f/ is largely always the same. Hentai, Porn, Loops Games, and it cycles through those flashes on repeat with new ones of the same exact thing over and over. In short, I don't respect the naive bubble you want to remain in with vain entertainment.
>> [_] Anon 1951278 >># Most of the posts on /f/ are reposts, so maybe I should just browse swfchan instead of coming here? Why do you think I come to /f/? Obviously you think my reasons are meaningless, since you intentionally disrupt my enjoyment as much as is in your power. You certainly do have the right to post trolling and offensive posts on /f/, but not to flood them.
>> [_] Anon 1951280 >># >In short, I don't respect the naive bubble you want to remain in with vain entertainment. I see, so you resort to violence then. Glad we made that clear!
>> [_] Anon 1951283 >># Like I said, zitgeist-chan arrogantly despises the very purpose of /f/
>> [_] Anon 1951284 >># I know, I'm just having a little bit of fun. It feels almost a little cruel, but still enjoyable!
>> [_] Anon 1951285 >># You are resorting to violence. Not covert violence, by the way, you are literally destroying our society as much as is in your power.
>> [_] Anon 1951286 >># No almost about it. How can you say you are superior to the people living in mansions, again?
>> [_] Anon 1951287 >># I told you that asking question would be a lot more fruitful~
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951288 >># If you want to believe zeitgeist is wrong, then it will be wrong or "unproven" as you say. I am confident for example I'm doing the right thing when I put up posters which say "make love not war". Apparently largely what a person's actions is based on is feelings. Zeitgeist: the movie's (the first zeitgeist film) war montage at the start of the film is the biggest pull on the heart strings I've ever seen.
>> [_] Anon 1951289 >># I haven't made up my mind yet. Please do not assume things on my behalf. :) All I'm asking is that you prove your statements! Surely you need to be coherent and truthful to appeal to our very good sense, yes? >I am confident for example I'm doing the right thing Yes, I am sure that you do think that. Question! If many posters tell you that you're doing the wrong thing, are you still in the right? Or does that make you a tyrant? (Hmm, we seem to be nearing some sort of conclusion that you might have some violent tendencies ...)
>> [_] Anon 1951291 >># Please hurry up! I await your replies warmly!
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951292 >># >># submitting zeitgeist flash is not violence lol >># I don't believe in capitalism (rich towering over the poor), can't you understand that? I don't believe in superiority of people, people should use science in regards to decisions concerning how we organise our social system. The stock market does no such thing!
>> [_] Anon 1951293 >># Putting up a mansion is not violence lol
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951294 >># putting up posters which say "make love not war" does not make me a tyrant. How would it? :S
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951296 >># A mansion in the current social order is violence covertly. Practicality I would not define as someone owning a 9 billion room mansion with gold plated toilet seats.
>> [_] Anon 1951297 >># >submitting zeitgeist flash is not violence lol You are not the victim, have you considered that your point of view on this matter is not shared by others? I think you should check your privilege! >I don't believe in capitalism (rich towering over the poor), can't you understand that? I am sorry, there have already been other ideologies that address that issue, how is yours better? I await your replies warmly.
>> [_] Anon 1951301 >># You are covering our posters with your propaganda. You say, Wait! my propaganda is good and healthy! You don't believe me? Then SUCK IT." What do your posts have to do with love?
>> [_] Anon 1951302 >># >Practicality I would not define as someone owning a 9 billion room mansion with gold plated toilet seats. Hyperbole. That aside, you still have not proven your statement. Merely explained that you were not a scientist of any sort.
>> [_] Anon 1951304 >># Do learn to read my good chap!
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951305 >># Besides alluding to the idea that "submitting zeitgeist flash is not violence", you're still yet to convince me of that idea. Trade societies are built on the rich towering over the poor. TRADE SOCIETIES, as in any society that includes ownership or property. Communism is still a TRADE society.
>> [_] Anon 1951307 I await your replies warmly~!
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951309 >># ad hominem fallacy, I would say a poster which says "make love not war" is to do with love?
>> [_] Anon 1951310 >># Hehe, that is where you lose. You assume that I was talking to you as a method to appeal to you? >Trade societies are built on the rich towering over the poor. TRADE SOCIETIES, as in any society that includes ownership or property. Communism is still a TRADE society. I am sorry, are you trying to explain the difference in ideology, or your ideology as an explanation of economies, or just pure opinion. Please clarify! I await your replies warmly~
>> [_] Anon 1951312 >># I am sorry, but that is not a ad hominem. Please revise and correct. (hehe)
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951313 >># Basically you can't understand what I'm saying, which is why you keep saying what I say is "unproven". you don't want zeitgeist to be proven to be true or false.
>> [_] Anon 1951314 Please reply faster~ I await your replies warmly~
>> [_] Anon 1951315 >># But sir, I have not seen one piece of proof so far. You shouldn't be so quick to judge someone that is interested in what you have to say? > you don't want zeitgeist to be proven to be true or false. Wait! Isn't that your job to do so?
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951316 >># I don't take your comment seriously, if you want to "win" in a debate with me then I immediately will think that you want to be ignorant. which you are alluding to: ignorance.
>> [_] Anon 1951317 >># And surely, if you can't explain your ideology in a manner that is understandable to the masses, it would be a good bet to assume that that is a rather huge oversight!
>> [_] Anon 1951318 >># But now you're just rude to people that simply want to learn from you and your great ideology. Oh no, this is exactly the sort of thing an evangelist should not do! I await your replies warmly.
>> [_] Anon 1951319 >># Please do not give up, maybe you will find some way to appeal to the masses. That is until someone starts asking questions, I guess?
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951320 >># >># the arguments are already in the flash content I submit. Saying I have no proof over and over while dismissing my reasoning doesn't make me listen to you :)
>> [_] Anon 1951322 >># But sir, the flash doesn't have prove either. You're making a circular argument! Which is another fallacy! I await your replies warmly~
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951324 >># I haven't given up, I've got a tonne of posters to put up, and there's plenty of zeitgeist lectures flash movies. I don't take you seriously as you dismiss my reasoning and desperately demand proof for what I say. You don't want zeitgeist to be right :)
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951325 >># words != proof Show me a study, or some research, or any scientific work,, with a reputable name attached to it. >Peter Joseph doesn't count
>> [_] Anon 1951326 >># >while dismissing my reasoning doesn't make me listen to you :) Tut tut, young sir, consider what I've told you earlier. Here's a tip; it's not an argument to appeal to you. It's an argument to embarrass you. Surely a smart fellow like you could deduce that already?
>> [_] Anon 1951328 100 GET!
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951329 >># >desperately demand proof for what I say. >prove me wrong Pick one.
>> [_] Anon 1951330 >># damn it
>> [_] Anon 1951332 >># You are a fool, and I am a fool for listening to you.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951333 >># >># any argument or evidence that is pro-zeitgeist you will be dismissive of because you want it to be wrong.
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951334 >># How can you say that? You haven't given any. And anyway, how would it justify you spamming /f/?
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951335 >># ad hominem is still not an argument.
>> [_] Anon 1951336 "The word cult in current popular usage is a pejorative term for a new religious movement or other group whose beliefs or practices are considered abnormal or bizarre by the larger society." - Wikipedia You see that, Zeitgeist fags? You're a cult if we* say you're a cult, not by defining yourself as one. And we* say you're a cult, so go be a cult somewhere else you stupid motherfuckers.
>> [_] Anon 1951337 you are all idiots for feeding the troll sage this newfags
>> [_] Anon 1951338 >># Well, and from this point on he'll just repeat himself. Anyway, I think I've taught everyone how to make zeitgeistchan look like a fool, and I've had my fun, so I should slag off now. Ta!
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951339 >># Oh how I wish he were a troll. Check the facebook page of his I posted in >># and you'll see.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951341 >># I can't argue against your ignorance. I've never seen an actual critical or logical argument against zeitgeist. Never. only ad hominem, slander and such. You don't want zeitgeist to be right because that means the whole market social system is totally ridiculous, which I know it is. But hey, just keep saying to yourself that the burden of proof TOTALLY relies on me and you don't have to lift a finger.
>> [_] Anon 1951343 >># >But hey, just keep saying to yourself that the burden of proof TOTALLY relies on me and you don't have to lift a finger. This needs to be a meme, laughing my ass off.
>> [_] Anon 1951345 >># you don't know the lengths some people go to troll. he could just think EVERY HOME IS A PRISON or he every night he could just be DOWN THE PUB
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951346 >># >keep saying to yourself that the burden of proof TOTALLY relies on me and you don't have to lift a finge So... you just want us to take what you say as gospel? Like, I dunno... religion? Or North Korea?
>> [_] Anon 1951347 >># Well it could be a troll, after all its just a namefag. Doesn't matter, I got to sharpen my blade on him.
>> [_] Anon 1951348 85 posts. Zeitgeist flash. Fuck you guys are stupid, you need to spend more time on /a/ or /v/. Shitposting 101: HIDE AND REPORT. fucking morons. I for one agree with some aspects of what zeitgeist stands for, but if the shit bugs you, fucking ignore it.
>> [_] Anon 1951349 He's not a troll in that he's being insincere about zeitgeist, but zeitgeist-chan is a troll in that his objective is to annoy everyone as much as possible.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951350 >># if zeitgeist is a cult, then report it to anti-cult groups if you're so concerned. Rickross forums were plagued with people who wanted zeitgeist to be a cult. the forum wasn't fooled.
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951352 >># >HIDE AND REPORT. I report every zeitgeist thread I see. I reported this one when it only a couple of replies. As for hiding, do you use an extension for this? Because I'd very much like it too. Threads on /f/ don't seem to work like normal ones.
>> [_] Anon 1951353 >># Oh you mean this is sort of false flag like? Eh, I don't really see the point, it's still going to be a niche movement after all. There is no point supporting it because it is too small, and no point being against it because it is too small.
>> [_] Anon 1951354 >># No one is complaining about the ideals of the zeitgeist movement, except as a way to ridicule the poster. We are only complaining about his behavior.
>> [_] Anon 1951356 >># I really hope this garbage is a bannable offense. Why can't he fag it up on youtube like other cult fanatics instead of spamming /f/?
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951357 >># ad hominem still isn't appealing.
>> [_] Anon 1951358 >># exactly DOESN'T MATTER you react, he wins its a simple as that, Stop feeling him and ignore the posts, he will only post 4 a day and if it really annoys you then just post more flash over the top.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951359 >># one way or another, ignorant people are going to react irrationally towards the zeitgeist movement's ideals and its members.
>> [_] Anon 1951360 >># You actually made me consider something interesting
>> [_] Anon 1951363 >># Should they be reported as spam or rules violation?
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951364 >># it's been banned here as "spam" (junk). Yet I know zeitgeist hasn't been looked into, Anon and moot WANT zeitgeist to be junk, communist propaganda or what have you so they can personally believe they're banning garbage.
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951365 >># I've been keeping an eye on him. Doesn't matter if he gets his replies or not, he posts his four god-damn flashes damn near every day. I tried ignoring it. He's been going for months now. Fucks sake, it's only 12% of the board space, too.
>> [_] Anon 1951366 >># and this matters how, /f/ is for the enjoyment of flash, and I really like this board and posting what I like as well and enjoying others flash Create a website, a blog, a forum or even your own image board for this stuff, if you want to create awareness. Be creative and be proactive in contributing if you really care about spreading a positive message, Don't worry next time I come round again I'll only remind you of this again
>> [_] Anon 1951367 >># Takes more effort to make an account. Eh, then again I always view comments of a flash before clicking on the flash itself. Doubt anyone else does any different.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951369 >># ad hominem still isn't valid.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951370 >># I don't submit to being banned censored deleted and so forth. I have my own personal awareness, if this is controversial awareness then that makes it interesting. If /f/ is for entertainment, then yes I do find this entertainment.
>> [_] sage sage 1951371 sage
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951373 >># I'm not entirely sure myself. He's trying to force his ideas and ideals on a community via posting and reposting, so in that sense it's spam. But he also violates a fuckton of rules too (globals 9, 10, 14, and 17, /f/'s 1, 3 and 4) so there's that too/
>> [_] Anon 1951376 >># Zeitgeist-chan, I really wish you would get it into your head that we HATE YOU, NOT THE ZEITGEIST MOVEMENT.
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951377 >># Either way, I've tried reporting it as both, neither seem to get it removed. Join the current thread on /q/: >>>/q/558208
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951378 >># besides particular anonymous on 4chan trying to stalk my activity on the internet (ad hominem), Some people are trying the same thing because of my other personal awareness and they call it "spam" among the other slanderous labels. There's always resistance regarding zeitgeist movement awareness so why not ironically submit it to where it will be most resisted?
>> [_] Anon 1951379 >># yeah well i get to go to a funeral on wednesday, I get to put up with being bullshitted around pretty much for the rest of my life and have to work and support myself like I always have and you get to do nothing and be proud. I hope you're happy. And yes you know who I am.
>> [_] Anon 1951381 >># I've never reported someone before. I guess nobody has pissed me off enough to in the way this guy does.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951382 >># ad hominem >># I am sorry about the funeral, yet I am not "doing nothing" as I would imagine spreading messages like "make love not war" is a nice thing to do. I don't take pride in the idea of people working to support themselves as I believe in cooperation, not competition. *SAD FACE*
>> [_] Anon 1951384 >># dude its bullshit and condescending seriously. You say this and make this message in such a hate filled way. And yes this is hate, it is provoking people in a kind of way in which is for your own personal benefit. It's hypocritical and I and fucking fed up with it.
>> [_] Anon 1951385 >># >># Maybe it's a way to get people desensitized to grassroots movements. Then again, I guess anythings possible, best keep a logical and coolheaded approach to everything as always.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951387 >># wanting cooperation instead of competition is not selfish.
>> [_] Anon 1951388 >># Yeah, and we did point out that his actions are inherently violent. Either he doesn't care(isn't smart enough to), or is just trolling.
>> [_] Anon 1951389 >># what and you think you are really going to achieve this by aggravating people?
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951390 >># the flash that I submit is not violent. take the gore flash movies (embedded video) or the trick flashes which make loud noise and quickly flashing frames. ad hominem again by the way.
>> [_] Anon 1951391 >># Like I said, could be a false flag, a troll, or just someone thats really really stupid.
>> [_] Anon 1951392 It seems to me the main concern is breaking global rules 9, 10, 11, and 14 (proxies), as well as 6. I'll try writing a copypasta to sage with and encourage anons to report. Does anyone think that won't be a good idea?
>> [_] Anon 1951393 >142 replies WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON IN HERE I'm pretty sure noone is stupid enough to think zeitgeist is a cult, but that's not the point here. The point is that this shit still isn't wanted on /f/. Zeitfag pls just go.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951394 >># People are aggravating themselves, if they see one of my posters that say "make love not war" and get arrogated, how can I take that seriously?
>> [_] Anon 1951395 >># Hm? I think its better that everyone is trained with the proper knowledge to ignore him. Reporting him does nothing in the long term, though we should find out if his ISP uses dynamic IPs or not, if not, getting him IP banned would be useful.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951396 >># ad hominem fallacy.
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951398 >># I was considering just replying to every zeitgeist flash with 'dolan pls'. Shit, I even made a trip for it: #.c4-iU-P comes out as !2QDOLANZ/Q, I thought the 2Q was somewhat relevant
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951399 >># about 6 preeminent times have come my way for submitting zeitgeist.
>> [_] Anon 1951401 >># haha
>> [_] Anon 1951402 >># its condescension, If you are meaningful in what you promote then why devalue your message by replying in the first place. I know you're not naive enough to know this effect on people. You need to stop this because you are capable of so much more than this behavior.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951403 >># I agree, science is communism and science is religion. Be proper educated and ignore zeitgeist.
>> [_] Anon 1951404 >># People started to voice their hate toward this guy and about getting rid of him and his spam. >># Thank you for putting effort into stopping this guy and showing me that thread.
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951405 >># I am sorry, but I'm FUCKING worried about people.
>> [_] Anon 1951406 >># Yeah, I'm starting to think that this is a troll. Notice the increase in frequency of replies to start people responding again. I think I'll have this filed under troll.
>> [_] Anon 1951407 copypasta below: /f/riends, please don't respond to Zeitgeist-chan. The best thing to do is report his threads and ignore his rude behavior. He has repeatedly and deliberately broken global rules 9 (ban evasion), 10 (flooding), 14 (proxies), as well as rule 6 (importance of quality and community). With your help, we can defend ourselves from this menace.
>> [_] Anon 1951408 >># Hmm, you should change your pasta. Or not use it at all, I think people should learn how to ignore trolls instead of being told not to.
>> [_] Anon 1951410 >># You can act upon this in far better ways, and I have already tried to help you and you just wont listen.
>> [_] f4r !HanakoDlmg 1951411 >># Saved thanks. Have some reheated pasta: A nigger, a Jew and a grossly obese Mexican man walk into a gay bar. They approach a cum-gargling faggot with a 2-inch long, always-flaccid penis using a laptop at a table. "You wanna come back to our place?" the nigger asks the faggot. "You can toss my Mexican friend's rancid herpes-and-shit-covered salad and jerk my Jewish friend's wart-and-pimple-covered penis while I ram my giant unlubed nigger-cock into your gaping oft-fucked asshole." "Literally nothing in the world would make me happier," says the faggot. "But first I need to start a zeitgeist thread on /f/. It will just take a moment."
>> [_] zeitgeist 1951412 >># censorship, guaranteed ignorance.
>> [_] Anon 1951413 >># but yeah I've got to go eat. Take care all, nice talk. Thanks for the entertainment, ZC.

File: Understandings.swf-(1.03 MB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1937776

File: phptu.swf-(1.03 MB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1924796

File: zeitgeist--.swf-(1.03 MB, Loop)
[_] FUCK YOU ZEITGEIST FUCK YOU ZEITGEIST 1919437

File: Understandings.swf-(1.03 MB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1780665

File: Understandings.swf-(1.03 MB, Loop)
[_] Anon 1770860
>> [_] Anon 1771095 tl;dr

File[Understandings.swf] - (1.03 MB)
[_] [?] Anon 1291071
>> [_] Anon 1291209 we know, jews did WTC. thanks. gtfo.

File[Understandings.swf] - (1.03 MB)
[_] [?] Anon 1227290
>> [_] Anon 1227291 let it go fool
>> [_] Anon 1227292 seriously, what the fuck is up with this unfunny trash

File[Understandings.swf] - (1.03 MB)
[_] [?] Anon 1132292 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 1132523 tl;dr