File[Ocean_Energy_-_Wave_Power_Station.s wf] - (5.55 MB)
[_] [L] Anon 1670384 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 1670393 interesting. Can it withstand a tsunami or rising sea level though? How would you stop sediment from building up around it? It never explicitly cites what energy one turbine can actually generate either (although I'm sure that information I could find myself if I wanted)
>> [_] Anon 1670441 >># >Can it withstand a tsunami or rising sea level though? Unless the sea level rises above the coastline, it shouldn't be a problem. It would most likely not be put in a tsunami-vulnerable zone, and would probably have safety features to protect it. >How would you stop sediment from building up around it? Regular maintenance, like anything else.
>> [_] Anon 1670507 >claims to be able to produce up to 40% of the world's energy >never gives a single number of actual power output Yeah, sounds great. Wonder if they sell monorails too, I heard its the /wave/ of the future.
>> [_] Anon 1670536 interesting, thanks
>> [_] Anon 1670563 >># But they did. They said "if fully exploited," which means having these stations on every single foot of coastline across the planet. IT IS A PARAGON OF EXCELLENCE.
>> [_] Anon 1670633 >># Whenever someone says "if fully exploited" I substitute that with "if someone else throws enough of their money at it and doesn't mind waiting a while."
>> [_] Anon 1670704 i will fuck the parents of anyone who invests in this.

File[Ocean_Energy_-_Wave_Power_Station.s wf] - (5.55 MB)
[_] [L] Anon 1620100 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 1620144 Hey, as long as sand buildup isn't a problem, it's worth a shit.
>> [_] Anon 1620173 who keeps posting these engineering/science flashes? Also this is an outmoded form of tidal generation.
>> [_] Anon 1620178 So... a tidal generator then.
>> [_] Anon 1620182 >># dam right
>> [_] White power 14/88 1620237 nigger
>> [_] Anon 1620239 >># ;D icwatudidthar
>> [_] Anon 1620310 this is the technology the world's current gas coal etc companies are paying to keep from becoming widely available
>> [_] Anon 1620314 >># Also, isn't this tech prohibitively expensive? Also, wouldn't it suck for landlocked countries? It's a great idea, but not exactly a wonder solution.
>> [_] Anon 1620317 lol troll physics

File[Ocean_Energy_-_Wave_Power_Station.s wf] - (5.55 MB)
[_] [L] Anon 1616010
>> [_] Anon 1616088 >40% of world wide power >700 to 800 nuclear power plants uh, how about no.
>> [_] Anon 1616140 >># expert talking
>> [_] Anon 1616163 lies from liberal proganda
>> [_] Anon 1616175 The energy may seem small, but it's extremely constant. Good energy source bro
>> [_] Anon 1616181 "turr bin"
>> [_] Anon 1616182 can i get the missile loop flash?
>> [_] Anon 1616187 >># I would ask how, but then you'd probably call me a stupid teenager or something conservative-y

File[Ocean_Energy_-_Wave_Power_Station.s wf] - (5.55 MB)
[_] [L] Anon 1603296
>> [_] Anon 1603307 How does it continue to spin in one motion when the air is going in two different directions?
>> [_] Anon 1603328 >># watch it again, they explain
>> [_] Anon 1603330 >voith >veidt >says they want to save the world >NOPE
>> [_] Anon 1603426 First off: Water actually transfers rotational kinetic energy when it waves, it doesn't move up and down as the majority of its energy. Second: >make an engine that goes in the same direction regardless of airflow >instead of using a rectifier >ISHYGDDT Reporting for advertising

File[Ocean_Energy_-_Wave_Power_Station.s wf] - (5.55 MB)
[_] [L] Anon 1595810
>> [_] Anon 1595817 >endless electricity if it works oil companies would never let it happen. >takes up coastline ecofags would never let it happen >only tech ever to be hated by big business and eco fags
>> [_] Anon 1595869 I'd like them to show their math...
>> [_] Anon 1595901 THROUGH THE TURBANTHROUGH THE TURBANTHROUGH THE TURBANTHROUGH THE TURBANTHROUGH THE TURBANTHROUGH THE TURBANTHROUGH THE TURBANTHROUGH THE TURBANTHROUGH THE TURBANTHROUGH THE TURBANTHROUGH THE TURBANTHROUGH THE TURBANTHROUGH THE TURBAN
>> [_] Anon 1595929 we demand stats from this. the idea is good but there is obviously reasons why even though this has been around since 2000 it still hasn't become so popular.
>> [_] Anon 1595931 The problem is that no one knows of its existence sadly. And yes, it needs proof and info
>> [_] friendsofsandwiches 1595990 I have to wonder how much coastline this takes up, and how much support structure we're talking about here. Also there's another problem of that if water levels keep rising, if we put something like this in one year, would 10-20 years from now after coastlines get eaten up, will said structure become pretty much a reef, and no other benefit? Seriously though, this concept is great, especially in places where you have 20-30 foot bore tides. Just I think most people look at something like this as a joke, and would preffer to just keep buying deisel for generators.
>> [_] Anon 1596134 TURBANS TO SPEED!

File[Ocean_Energy_-_Wave_Power_Station.s wf] - (5.55 MB)
[_] [L] Anon 1580414 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 1580610 the saddest part about these eco-power stations is that they are no doubt patented, the inventors want to make money rather than save the environment (thats a bonus). so if someone wants to spontaneously make one they cant without paying lots of fees. otherwise these things would probably be a lot more common