File: taser.swf-(2.13 MB, 320x240, Other)
[_] THATS HURTS THAT HURTS Anon 2066576 Dont Taze Me Bro Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 2066579 Story behind that?
>> [_] Anon 2066587 Yes, from what I've seen, I can't imagine what provoked that response.
>> [_] Anon 2066597 >># This, I think it is because he didn't get up and walk he was 'resisting'.
>> [_] Ruckus 2066599 Sometimes cops go overboard with the idea that people have to do exactly what they say when they say it. Under no circumstances does an old man, who could very easily have a heart attack from the exertion, need to be tasered. Even if he's physically threatening someone, the cop ought to just shoot him if he's armed anyway or tackle him otherwise. This is ridiculous.
>> [_] Anon 2066600 That sure pulled me into the screaming lady's story. I wonder what it is?
>> [_] Anon 2066602 mebbe it was the knife.
>> [_] Anon 2066629 i hope these two idiots got fired. though thats not very likely
>> [_] Anon 2066633 get mad scrubs
>> [_] Anon 2066634 気持ち悪い
>> [_] Anon 2066635 looks like he was trying to tell them that he couldn't put his arm behind his back (probably due to arthritis) and they decided, like assholes, that he was resisting. some cops really shouldn't be cops.
>> [_] Anon 2066636 OP Here, What i find amazing is how quickly he recovered from the taser. Also he was held in contempt it seems due to the person on the stand was talking "poorly" about his wife.
>> [_] Anon 2066639 anyone have a youtube link we can link to?
>> [_] Anon 2066640 yea pass this shit on. lets see if we can make this news.
>> [_] Anon 2066644 >># yeah a flash video on 4chan is going to make headlines get a life kid
>> [_] Anon 2066645 >># trips,dubs confirm
>> [_] Anon 2066646 http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=1 775682n
>> [_] Anon 2066654 ;DAMN IT SHITCURITY, I DIDNT MEAN TO TREASPASS THERE HALP SHITCURITY IS KILLING ME FOR NO REASON
>> [_] Anon 2066670 >># I love you.
>> [_] Anon 2066676 never mind he's a convicted killer. taze em again boys
>> [_] Anon 2066680 >># Thanks, Anon
>> [_] Anon 2066686 lol I live in Kansas, I remember when this happened. good lels
>> [_] Anon 2066688 If he was so dangerous, he'd be in handcuffs already at the trial. You're telling me two middle-aged pigs can't subdue an old man? They're just piglets. Totally unnecessary escalation of force.
>> [_] Anon 2066692 and so many faggots trried to help him...
>> [_] Anon 2066694 All cops are scum
>> [_] Anon 2066700 he probably deserved it i fucking hate old stupid people like that, i'm sure before this clip he was made perfecty aware of what he needed to do and he was to stupid to follow orders. serves him right.
>> [_] Anon 2066704 >># >an example of two cops being faggots >DURR DEY MUST ALL B BAD GUIS UR HURR DURRF
>> [_] Anon 2066706 Take that Kansas scum!
>> [_] Anon 2066714 lol the cop that didn't taze him is being charged for murdering his wife right now that video was just some shit the news dug up
>> [_] Anon 2066715 I see people saying it was too much force... But regardless of a man's physical appearence, if -you- were in the cops' shoes. Would you take the risk of not using enough force to subdue a man who you already know is willing to kill?
>> [_] Anon 2066719 >whites cant even handle their white old criminals >whites still believe they are the chosen one >inb4 /pol/
>> [_] Anon 2066723 Sorry to tell you guys this, but in America, you aren't hired if you're too smart. They assume smart people apparently get tired of beating up old men, attacking niggers, and following the beck and call of the Jew when white people disagree.
>> [_] Anon 2066724 >># Where have you been since the invention of video? Cops are regularly recorded abusing their position and hardly anything ever comes of it. Ever see this one? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OauOPTw bqk#t=24s
>> [_] Anon 2066727 I bet the same people who say "Cops are all scum and use excessive force" are the same smug assholes who say shit like, "If anyone ever fucks with me I'd just kill their stupid ass"
>> [_] Anon 2066738 >># i bet you are the kind of people that believe that the "law" can handle "your problems"
>> [_] Anon 2066742 >># The unarmed old guy? Unarmed old guy in court? Killer or not >Unarmed in a courtroom If -I- was the cop I wouldn't have done shit. Because theres being a cop then being a full retard in uniform.
>> [_] Anon 2066753 *Hurr, if a 200 pound muscle-bound black person tried robbing me, I would use my patriotic spirit to turn him into splintered bone ''murka FUCK YEAH!'*
>> [_] Anon 2066770 >># Just 2? are you fucking blind or do you regularly avoid news and headlines about asshole cops? When we give as much power to them as they currently have they are obligated to respect it. They don't, across the board. Police departments all over the country don't respect their own authority, they abuse it and waive it around like a rag doll and anyone that gets hit by said metaphorical rag doll is of no consequence to them. Pull your head out of your ass.
>> [_] Anon 2066775 >># Not at all. I fully admit that gradschoolers can kick my ass. This isn't about being a tough guy. This is about abuse of powers.
>> [_] Anon 2066792 >># Whoever loses, we win.
>> [_] Anon 2066833 I think Standard Procedure for when people get Mouthy in Court is to have the Baliff escourt them back into containment. Which, for a convict might be a brig, or a squad car. However, A) If he was a con at the time, why was he not in cuffs already? B) Even if he was getting physical, I have no doubts that the officers would have him under control. They could just force-walk him out - The taser seemed excessive. I don't see him being overly forceful or threatening, just mouthy. C) Ok, so now knowing he's a con of some sort, that still doesn't demonize him enough to make this OK. Anyone can be a hair's breadth from the wrong side of the law. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they _came... Scope the Lawyer sweeping in to grab the chair. Who does he think he's helping? Seems like the odd job to step up to do.
>> [_] Anon 2066841 git lazed nigga #Rekt.
>> [_] Anon 2066858 >># A convict must be in handcuffs unless the escorting officers are otherwise directed by the judge to remove the handcuffs. So in this case, he must have had his cuffs removed by the escorting officers. Don't know enough about the backstory to say anything else, but I come from a custodial background so if there's a story somewhere I can tell you more. And the lawyer was at least doing something, instead of standing around like most bystanders in every video ever.
>> [_] Anon 2066866 >># You obviously haven't heard of Jerkin Joe's Pizza
>> [_] Anon 2066899 >># When cops try to cuff you and you resist that, you're resisting. And they can taze you. And that's fine with me.
>> [_] Anon 2066911 >># Better to be tazed than shot. They problem was the cops not being able to control an old man. But the alternative is more physical violence as a result of forcing him into cuffs. Before tazers they would have beat him with batons. >that people have to do exactly what they say when they say it But they do. If the have cause. That guy wouldn't leave. They tried to force him to leave. He wouldn't.
>> [_] Anon 2066918 US law ladies and gents