STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR | Archived flashes: 228028 |
/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/ | P0001 · P2560 · P5119 |
This is resource RS72JJ8, an Archived Thread.
Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/2909783 Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 32. Discovered flash files: 1 File: Minus 8 - Koopa Girl (best edit).swf-(1.25 MB, 720x480, Hentai) [_] Anonymous 09/21/15(Mon)23:01:47 No.2909783 Marked for deletion (old). >> [_] Anonymous 09/21/15(Mon)23:07:23 No.2909789 koopa lad >> [_] Anonymous 09/21/15(Mon)23:08:03 No.2909791 >>2909783 wew girl >> [_] Anonymous 09/21/15(Mon)23:11:27 No.2909796 Report this cancerous spam Keep /f/ clean >> [_] Anonymous 09/21/15(Mon)23:17:32 No.2909805 >>2909796 Its just like any other forced meme here. It will eventually fade. Just wait it out and enjoy the ride man. Who knows, perhaps you will start to like it. >> [_] Anonymous 09/21/15(Mon)23:20:00 No.2909811 even though this is a troll edit do not rename flashes noko is the title >> [_] Anonymous 09/21/15(Mon)23:21:46 No.2909814 >>2909805 Nope. I used to like it very much. Then I saw it the second time. Then I saw it the third time and started realizing all the flaws of the animation. Then I saw it 500th time with all those shitty tryhard nice comments. Then people started to hate it because it started to become a spam rather than a flash. Now the more you spam it, the more haters it gets. So congrats, you singlehandedly made people hate this flash... Unless that was your intention. >> [_] Anonymous 09/21/15(Mon)23:25:14 No.2909821 >>2909814 What flaws were those, just wondering. >> [_] Anonymous 09/21/15(Mon)23:25:25 No.2909822 wew koopa lad >> [_] Anonymous 09/21/15(Mon)23:28:34 No.2909826 wew lad >> [_] Anonymous 09/21/15(Mon)23:30:28 No.2909828 >>2909821 crappy animation, drawing, art, unfappability...etc >> [_] Anonymous 09/21/15(Mon)23:35:48 No.2909833 >>2909814 Perhaps it's just me then. I hated the potato kanishes flash when it was being posted like crazy, but I eventually grew fond of it at the least. >> [_] Anonymous 09/21/15(Mon)23:37:29 No.2909834 >>2909828 Not much of flaws, just you disliking the art. Do you have any more specific criticisms? >> [_] Anonymous 09/21/15(Mon)23:41:53 No.2909836 >>2909833 Yeah spamming does that. >>2909834 There isn't much art or effort spent on this flash to discuss. I can't talk about shading since there is no shading, it's just a flat color. I can't talk about animation art since it's not even frame by frame, it's just some primitive cheap tweening. I can't talk about line art, the lines don't even match other parts of the body. It's only good for the first few times you see it, but the flaws become impossible to ignore after the 3th time. It's just not a quality flash. >> [_] Anonymous 09/21/15(Mon)23:45:25 No.2909837 >>2909836 It's vector/cell art. It's a certain stylistic choice and appropriate for the subject matter (retro video games). The flash matches the rhythm well, and the animation is smooth and well put together. >> [_] Anonymous 09/21/15(Mon)23:57:49 No.2909847 >>2909837 > It's vector/cell art. Every flash is vector art. To call it cell shaded, it needs to depict the volume with toned colors. This is just one flat color. If you want to see cell shaded amazing art, look at Shadman, thats what cell shading means : http://www.shadbase.com/ > the animation is smooth and well put together. Animation is pretty cheap and lazy. Especially compared to the giants like Shadman, GaussianFracture or Zone, this is terrible. Definitely not worth posting a 3rd time let alone the 500th time. >> [_] Anonymous 09/22/15(Tue)00:02:15 No.2909855 >every flash is vector art I have a feeling that looking on /f/ should tell you how wrong you are. .swf does not imply vector art at all. How is the animation cheap and lazy? >> [_] Anonymous 09/22/15(Tue)00:03:42 No.2909856 >>2909847 >http://www.shadbase.com/ not cell shaded btw >> [_] Anonymous 09/22/15(Tue)00:14:33 No.2909865 >>2909847 Shad doesnt do much animations, its spazkid you're thinking of, shows you dont know much about flash. >> [_] Anonymous 09/22/15(Tue)00:19:52 No.2909870 wewpa >> [_] Anonymous 09/22/15(Tue)00:21:05 No.2909873 >>2909855 Flash works with vectors. Every line, brush, fill, shape, tween is based on vector elements. Unless you import jpegs or pngs and animate them, its vectors. > How is the animation cheap and lazy? As I explained in the above post. Look at other artists work and see the massive gap in animation skills. >>2909856 >>2909865 My bad. Spaz animated a few works from Shad thats why I confused them. Disregard Shad's art is amazing by itself. >> [_] Anonymous 09/22/15(Tue)00:28:48 No.2909877 >>2909783 wew lad >> [_] Anonymous 09/22/15(Tue)00:37:01 No.2909886 >>2909873 >As I explained in the above post. As you can see in your above post you explained nothing. You just go "this flash sucks because these people r better". That's hardly constructive. In any case, it is not difficult to see the flaw in suggesting "x is better than y, thus y sucks". >> [_] Anonymous 09/22/15(Tue)00:53:37 No.2909898 >>2909886 What is the flaw in suggesting "x is better than y, thus y sucks". ? Do you only compare x with x so it doesn't suck ? >> [_] Anonymous 09/22/15(Tue)01:03:10 No.2909905 >>2909898 If a crudely drawn line was the only art in the world with nothing to compare it to, people would still be able to tell that it sucks. However, that also comes down to whether or not people care about art. Art in general really only started to pick up when people started caring about it as a means of projecting one's feelings rather than simply stating the visual nature of what they were depicting. (draw a stick person and you know it's supposed to be a person. In a world where folk don't care about art, the stick person is totally okay.) I really don't remember where I was going with this. I think I was trying to say that things can still be judged if they have nothing to be compared to. >> [_] Anonymous 09/22/15(Tue)01:08:42 No.2909911 >>2909905 You have to judge it by what is achieveable with Flash, and what other people have done with Flash. That's how you can judge an artist and his work. And compared to other artists, this flash would be on the bottom of the list due to it's low visual quality and lack of effort. >> [_] Anonymous 09/22/15(Tue)01:17:04 No.2909915 >>2909911 By lack of effort are you talking about the janky legs on the guy or the minor, weird, stair-like phenomenon happening with the girl's forearms? Plus, if this is having a lack of effort then one can only imagine what he could do if he put his mind to it. As far as "low quality" works go, this is easily on the top if you compare it to the legions of other low quality works that are similar to it. Also, even if it's low quality from a practical stand-point, it definitely does its job as far as being a rhythm based porn parody with a goofy doopy art-style. And as far as comparing goes, this kind of art-style is my favorite and since no one really does it except for him, that kind of makes him the "best" at it. However, if Zone or someone else started doing this style, I wouldn't have to worry about having my dick not be hard when I'm in my 80s. I don't really know how to end this rant(?(can't really think of a better word. I'm tired)) so I'll just leave it there since my fried brain can't think of other things to cover. >> [_] Anonymous 09/22/15(Tue)01:19:42 No.2909920 >>2909915 I goofed when I said "similar to it" since I later stated that his works are somewhat unique to his style. Beh. Disregard that if you would. >> [_] Anonymous 09/22/15(Tue)01:22:19 No.2909922 >>2909898 (x better than y) ==> (y sucks) is not a true proposition. x can be better than y, but x and y can both be exemplary things. All the proposition tells you for sure that if y is good, then x is better. >> [_] Anonymous 09/22/15(Tue)01:23:19 No.2909923 IF I SEE THAT FUCKING FACE POSTED ONE MORE TIME! >> [_] Anonymous 09/22/15(Tue)01:29:08 No.2909929 >>2909920 >>2909915 The effort you spend depict an artists quality. Doing low quality woks will make you a low quality artist, no matter if he happens to have more talent, which doesn't seem to have since all his works have the same cheap quality. I have no idea how this being rhytm-based makes it a better flash. It's the same badly drawn characters and same lazy animation. To make a tween rythm based, you literally just stretch up the tweens and nothing more. It's okay if it's your favourite style but there's a reason why great animators have thousands of fans where as Minus8 have almost none. >> [_] Anonymous 09/22/15(Tue)01:35:46 No.2909937 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iy9PuhOHXZQ be sure to save this as mp3 using some converter site so you can put it on your boombox and play it at anime cons and such. it's such a classic. |
|