/ > /fap/ > Thread 10180 Age: 32.61d Health: 0% Posters: 19 Posts: 25 Replies: 23 Files: 2+2
>> Anon 41456 2016z001065 (loli) 2016z001065 (loli) [IMG] aplb.swf (12.62 MiB) 960x720, Uncompressed. 70 frames, 24 fps (00:03). Ver6, AS1/AS2. Network access: Text: Bitmaps: Yes. Audio: Video: [find in archive]
>> Anon 41462 many scenes, im not too much of a fan of these more realistic body types though
>> Anon 41465 >># Yeah, there's loli, and then there's "drawn pedo"
>> Anon 41467 >># There's real and there's fake, that's it. Anything else is just hypocritical nonsense.
>> Anon 41496 this is a gold mine of animation reference. everything could be re-done easily to suet your own taste / fetish. I just wonder how one would in flash.
>> Anon 41500 >># Keep telling yourself that.
>> Anon 41502 Oh boy, been a while since our last loli thread, cant wait to see the shitstorm that goes on in the comment section over time.
>> Anon 41506 i just wish it was uncensored and finished.
>> Anon 41507 >># Just listen to what she says at this moment: https://youtu.be/uLXvsbzw2xY?t=2m25s
>> Anon 41514 This is really only appealing to pedophiles. Keep pretending it's not, but deep inside you know you're one. This is what happens to sex deprived people, taking interest in trash like this.
>> Anon 41516 people keep throwing the word "pedo" around so much that the power of it is starting to diminish. the same thing happened to "rape", feminists kept throwing that word around so much that the first thing i think now when i hear somebody has been raped is "yeah but was it real rape though?"
>> Anon 41522 >># >realistic Only if the guy have 3.5 meters. >># Only if furry drawings are to zoophiles, only if Bugs Bunny is look-alike to a real rabbit. [IMG]giant.png
>> Anon 41525 My issue with this animation is that it looks like a goblin being fucked by a cave troll. But not in a good way. If you're gonna draw sexy children it helps if you do the sexy part correctly. Who the Hell wants to fuck an ugly kid?
>> Anon 41529 >># Keep bridging the gap between criminals and non-criminals. Before long you will have watered out "pedophile" to a useless buzzword no one takes seriously just like >># pointed out.
>> Anon 41539 >># Look mate, you can enjoy beating your weasel to children getting fucked, and keep pretending that "dude jacking off to children isn't bad. I'm no pedo man!" but it's the exact same god damn thing a crack junkie would say. You all need some self reflection. You can't use your memes to defend you in every single situation. Instead of pretending this aren't bad you might want to try to avert child porn, even if it's drawn, if you care at all to avert yourself from future insults(inb4 "im way 2 edgy to be hurt by insults anyway :^D")
>> Anon 41540 >># so if we'd got to a site full of cp, and you'd call everyone a pedo for they clearly are you could just say "man ur makin a buzzword of it lole. Ur stoped". alternatively, instead of pretending, you could admit y'all are actual pedos
>> Anon 41556 >># >># Why 2 separate posts? If this was a real picture, you'd have a point. This is a FUCKING drawing. By your logic we should ban Hollywood movies with violence and crime, since watching a bank robbery makes me an accessory to the act. Stop your fucking thought crime crusade, snowflake.
>> Anon 41575 WILL SOMEBODY THINK OF THE FICTIONAL DRAWN CHILDREN ?!?!?!?!
>> Jesus Crust 41685 >Realistic There's no reasoning with normies anymore lol
>> Anon 41687 >># disagree. loli is an artificial aesthetic. this is meant to actually look like children. definitely a boner killer
>> Anon 41795 >># I suppose if deliberately make my GTA character a crack junkie I should "self reflect" because it's objectively bad and any disagreement is "pretending". Drop the sanctimony and just shame it like a generic hater. Like you surely did with furries, who want to rape diseased animals and any denial is pretending.
>> Anon 41797 >># Someone finally fucking gets it
>> Anon 41803 >># if you're such a good, upstanding, morally superior guy, mind telling me what you're doing here in the first place?
>> Anon 41865 here's a crazy thought, Leave
>> Anon 41874 >># >># holy fuck you care way too much about those pixels on your screen, you don't need to bait this hard personally I have no interest in this animation because like >># said, it's too realistic for me to like it, and that's a fine opinion to have on this board as it's something we can "discuss" about to reach new ways of thinking and open topics of conversation saying this is illegal though is retarded and if you truly think people are criminals for looking at pictures on a screen you should be selectively bred out of society