File: I'll make cum later..swf-(1.42 MB, 600x600, Porn)
[_] Anon 3439760
>> [_] Anon 3439766 this an edit by you?
>> [_] Anon 3439773 why does this flash make my cpu freak out
>> [_] Anon 3439811 >># It is a bitcoin miner.
>> [_] Anon 3439849 >># based
>> [_] Anon 3439851 >># would make a whopping 1 cents worth of bitcoin every week

File: I'll make cum later..swf-(1.42 MB, 600x600, Loop)
[_] Anon 3385879
>> [_] Anon 3385881 why you make this? i can't really tell what is different compared to the original: http://eye.swfchan.com/flash.asp?id=1660 55&n=shantae.swf is it the guy's stomach? seems to lag a little more than the original too or is that just my imagination?
>> [_] Anon 3385886 well from what i can see it looks like he's trying to update it? except it kinda caused it become more laggy however wierdly enough her face dosent seem to lag.
>> [_] Anon 3385892 Do you have fucking eyes? The new one looks way better. The breasts bounce better, and it actually looks like she's getting fucked instead of the guy's stomach just expanding and covering his dick.
>> [_] Anon 3385893 >># upper half is exactly the same (well maybe more laggy) and the lower half is different but neither better nor worse. you see a little more of her booty, at the expense of the fucking looking a little more unrealistic i suppose (looks like his dick stretches or her pussy acting like a suction cup)
>> [_] Anon 3385909 huh looking at both now side to side yeah this one looks defintly better (minus the breast bounce slightly kinda like the bounce in the original more) the only thing thats the same is the arms and head but anyway a bit more work is needed though to smoothen it out a bit so it's less laggy otherwise great job on the edit/update
>> [_] Anon 3385916 I'm more curious about the file name, the fuck does that mean?
>> [_] Anon 3385917 This reminded me to make some cum today
>> [_] Anon 3385919 Probably just means he’ll add the cum later
>> [_] Anon 3385920 needs more tweens. Double the number of frames.
>> [_] Anon 3385923 >># This.
>> [_] Anon 3385938 >># If you set it right click, quality -> low, you can see a smoother frame. But I will try IT later.
>> [_] Anon 3385941 If it's lagging from performance then maybe the guy model should be simplified to just the dick. No one wants to see his fat anyway.
>> [_] Sammy 3385965 Plays better at higher framerate on standalone compared to embed
>> [_] Anon 3385975 >># i think he meant this technique: http://swfchan.net/41/UMZ6V2X.shtml#67668 no matter what you always have 120 FPS in your flash and you just tween between the key frames as much as possible. as long as the computer can manage 120 FPS it can only improve things. what >># suggested is to increase the current 39 FPS to 78, which might be wise since it is already lagging so probably will take a while until the average computer cpu is strong enough to output the flash in 120 fps (while fullscreen) kinda odd that the current fps is 39 btw and not 40