File[large_hadron_collider.swf] - (347 KB)
[_] [?] Anon 1102517
>> [_] Anon 1102548 Haha, i fucking wish. Best way to kill 6.7 billion cancer cells at the same time.
>> [_] Anon 1102556 Right. Please, if you ever get cancer, post here about it. We'll kill your cancer by burning you to ashes. Operation successive: patient deceased
>> [_] Anon 1102562 >># Troll'd. 6.7 billion is the population of Earth.
>> [_] Anon 1102567 >># >># lol i kno rite? humans are such garbudge
>> [_] Anon 1102568 Nice copypasta, OP.
>> [_] Anon 1102637 This might be awesome if it weren't so poorly shooped.
>> [_] Anon 1102641 i keep reading it as large hardon collider. what's the worst that could happen really?
>> [_] Anon 1102642 Someone post large hardon collider.swf?
>> [_] Anon 1102700 >># The worst that could happen is that the LHC could produce a stable strangelet which would convert the mass of the Earth into a quark star.
>> [_] Anon 1102718 >># The joke is that the only people who actually are trash are the misanthropes!
>> [_] Anon 1102729 >># No, there are plenty of kinds of trash. That being said, no sense deep-sixing the planet for the sins of a billion or so douchebags.
>> [_] Anon 1102735 >># I disagree. fuck me fuck you fuck us all
>> [_] Anon 1102737 The upcoming experiments at the Large Hadron Collider have sparked fears among the public that the LHC particle collisions might produce doomsday phenomena, involving the production of stable microscopic black holes or the creation of hypothetical particles called strangelets.[44] Two CERN-commissioned safety reviews have examined these concerns and concluded that the experiments at the LHC present no danger and that there is no reason for concern,[45][46][47] a conclusion expressly endorsed by the American Physical Society.[48]
>> [_] Anon 1102740 >># If a stable piece of strange matter is created, it would be hurtled into deep space at near-light speeds. You ARE aware that strange matter has the same polarity as an electron, right? If you know anything about electromagnetism, you'd know same polarities oppose each other. A stranglet would NEVER touch an atom. Additionally even a stable micro black hole would probably miss every particle and never accrete anything at all. Note that both situations are hideously unlikely anyway. In fact, it's believed that the LHD has a better chance of disrupting a universal constant and destroying reality as we know it than creating a stable singularity.
>> [_] Anon 1102743 >># >Implying that nuclei always have a negative overall charge >youfailit.jpg
>> [_] Anon 1102765 >># keep in mind, the LHC is colliding 2 streams of equal velocity, anything that is created with have a net momentum of zero, it will just sit there until it dissapates, so there is a 1^10000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 chance that anything could stay stable long enough to destroy the earth

File[large_hadron_collider.swf] - (347 KB)
[_] [?] Soon! Anon 1079185 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 1079207 i dont think the black hole gets bigger as it sucks in
>> [_] Anon 1079214 OSHISHISHISHISHISHISHISHISHISHISHISHI It doesn't get larger. It simply sucks...and sucks...and sucks. And sucks. Like Pamela Anderson.
>> [_] Anon 1079303 >># like your joke :(
>> [_] Anon 1079330 >># In theory all observers would see the black hole sucking everything in, torn apart, and generally disassembled, whilst all those that were being smeared around this tasty black hole would not even feel it and wouldn't realise what was happening. So a webcam that close to the event horizon, given it was still somehow powered and sending images, would see the room swirling and possibly see parts of itself in the matter ring forming around the center of the hole. This takes into account the possiblity of a black hole forming on Earth, which in and of itself is borderline scientifically unsound, and if one could even form it would not be able to stabilise long enough to support growth or extended destruction of the matter and light around it.
>> [_] Anon 1079373 Awesome, it even set the timestamp on the camera back a year. PIME TARADOX!
>> [_] Anon 1079383 What if the world really did end a year ago, but as we're being sucked into the black hole it has accelerated time in such a way that from our perspective we're living our lives as normal, being drawn into the singularity at such a slow rate that we don't notice it happening? Whereas an outside observer would have seen the entire planet disappear in the fraction of a second one year ago.
>> [_] Anon 1079391 >># because you're an idiot and it doesn't work like that
>> [_] Anon 1079406 >># It sucks in the light, so of course it would get darker around it.
>> [_] Anon 1079442 god I can't wait
>> [_] Anon 1079473 >># SCIENCE!
>> [_] Anon 1079514 Penis!

File :[LHC webcam.swf] - (347 KB)
[_] [?] LHC Switchon webcam CERN 825608 Y halo thar Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] TheAdmiral 825611 Shoop it or stop posting it
>> [_] Anon 825817 Impossible, time relativity would make it impossible for the electri signals to reach my ocompter
>> [_] Anon 825820 >># More like 'Impossible, all they did was accelerate photon(or was it proton? im not a particle physicist) around the device on the 10th, arnt doing collisions until 21st of august'