File[1518226.swf] - (3.61 MB)
[_] [?] is this art? Anonymous 03/01/12(Thu)14:35 No.1629093
/r/ing song and video sauce
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 03/01/12(Thu)14:39 No.1629094
>whatthefuckdidijustwatch.jpg
>> [_] Anonymous 03/01/12(Thu)14:44 No.1629095
Who creates things like this? I mean, is there someone who is like: Oh, Im bored, lets make an
animation about two creatures on a mountain who free a big white cat-head circled by some smaller
black cat hats, and after that quickly run to a crashed nazi-bomber to hide behind that bomber,
then the cat hat opens up, dropping silver-pellets and a floating white head?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/01/12(Thu)15:44 No.1629118
this is sparta
>> [_] Anonymous 03/01/12(Thu)15:51 No.1629124
Don't you know it's only art if you cannot understand it and as such, yes this is art anon this
is art.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/01/12(Thu)16:08 No.1629133
Well, I only took one college course on art history, but I aced it cos I thought it was
interesting.
So, I would say that on one hand it isn't because it clearly requires the artist to explain it.
I've seen this posted a bunch of times and no one seems to know what's going on no matter how
hard they try. And I think the type of people who lurk are considerably more..."open-minded" than
the average community. So I would say that, in particular, makes it NOT.
On the other hand though, this brings to mind the abstract and surrealist movement. It seems to
be the type of work that wasn't wholly planned out, just worked up as it was worked on.
So I'm really on the fence about this one.
>> [_] urmom 03/01/12(Thu)16:30 No.1629141
This isn't art, it's stupidity.
>> [_] Anonymous 03/01/12(Thu)17:17 No.1629171
>>1629133
what if it needs no explanation and is just about 2 face-shapeshifting creatures who release a
cat filled with a floating head and the nazi bomber is just a normal crashed nazi bomber?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/01/12(Thu)20:09 No.1629265
Maybe the artist wanted to transport the feeling of "wtf"?
>> [_] Anonymous 03/01/12(Thu)20:18 No.1629277
>>1629265
maybe the artist wanted to vlow up our braens
>> [_] Anonymous 03/01/12(Thu)20:23 No.1629282
I need this in higher quality
