Anonymous ## Mod
Test thread #2 is GO! 06/09/12(Sat)03:28
No.
File: rap_chop.swf-(6.56 MB, Other)
[_] Test thread #2 is GO! Anonymous ## Mod 06/09/12(Sat)03:28 No.

  Things that should be fixed:
  noko
  nokosage
  "Post Successful!" screen

  and some other things

  at some point the [IMG]will be restored

  oh also the style on burichan/futaba should look a bit better also

Marked for deletion (old).
>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)03:34
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:34
No.

  WHY WOULD YOU CHANGE /f/.

  IT WAS FINE FUCK

  WHERE ARE THE HIGHLIGHTED OLD THREADS?

>>
Anonymous ## Mod
06/09/12(Sat)03:34
No.
[_]Anonymous##ModNo.
06/09/12(Sat)03:34 No.

  >>1694738
  it is better now and i will fix that

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)03:34
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:34
No.

  No increase in the file size limit?
  Looks like truncation is fixed.

>>

06/09/12(Sat)03:37
No.
[_]No.06/09/12(Sat)03:37
No.

  flood incoming

  wait who am i kidding this is /f/

>>
Akira Fudo
06/09/12(Sat)03:37
No.
[_]AkiraFudoNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:37
No.

  Im not enjoying the new layout. Could you just increase the bar sizes of text? Kind of annoying
  to look at now.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)03:37
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:37
No.

  Wait, we have mods?

>>
ᴬᴺᴼᴺGuy
06/09/12(Sat)03:38
No.
[_]ᴬᴺᴼᴺGuyNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:38
No.

  trip codes still dont seem to work right, not that you need em here but still

>>
Akira Fudo
06/09/12(Sat)03:38
No.
[_]AkiraFudoNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:38
No.

  Theres also no longer nothing indicating if it says /h/ or not. Making it harder to find porn

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)03:39
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:39
No.

  >>1694746
  youre right now it just says hentai, what will the world do?

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)03:39
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:39
No.

  >>1694746
  ... you mean the "tag"? It says the whole word now.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)03:40
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:40
No.

  How about a "stream" tag?
  Occasionally, people post very small files that are a video or audio player which streams content
  from elsewhere.
  Few are gifted in this wizardry, but it still might come in handy.

>>
lol test
06/09/12(Sat)03:41
No.
[_]loltestNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:41
No.

  testing tripcode to see if it works
  this board does not seem to support trips with Japanese symbols on it
  #mK撃^[Dk <---example

>>
ᴬᴺᴼᴺGuy !.RAPE.curg
06/09/12(Sat)03:41
No.
[_]ᴬᴺᴼᴺGuy!.RAPE.curgNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:41
No.

  >>1694750
  testing

>>
ᴬᴺᴼᴺGuy !.RAPE.curg
06/09/12(Sat)03:42
No.
[_]ᴬᴺᴼᴺGuy!.RAPE.curgNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:42
No.

  >>1694751
  normal trips work

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)03:43
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:43
No.

  >not pinning this to the top of /f/
  >stickies still not working?
  >bwhahahaha

>>
Anonymous ## Mod
06/09/12(Sat)03:43
No.
[_]Anonymous##ModNo.
06/09/12(Sat)03:43 No.

  >>1694750
  will fix now

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)03:45
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:45
No.

  the thing I like the least about the layout is the information I care the least about is on the
  left. Maybe I just need to get used to it, but I feel like the most important information (i.e.
  the file name/tag) is the hardest to browse. /f/ is different from a lot of other boards, in that
  the content is typically the file; the default "just uploading something because I have to" is
  the exception, not the rule, and therefore stuff like OP's name, subject, time and post number
  are even more secondary that what they are on other boards.

>>

06/09/12(Sat)03:46
No.
[_]No.06/09/12(Sat)03:46
No.

  >>1694756
  sweet

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)03:47
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:47
No.

  file name and tags should be left most on the board,no one cares about poster name or post
  number, though i do like how the new layout looks the order is just not good

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)03:47
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:47
No.

  IMO Tag column should be to the left of the file column so that one could easily read the
  filename and content with relative ease.

>>
Anonymous ## Mod
06/09/12(Sat)03:47
No.
[_]Anonymous##ModNo.
06/09/12(Sat)03:47 No.

  ok tripcodes should now be fixed

>>
Akira Fudo
06/09/12(Sat)03:48
No.
[_]AkiraFudoNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:48
No.

  >>1694747
  I liked the little indicators. Sometimes you get porn some times you get something strange.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)03:48
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:48
No.

  not sure if this is just me but my name field gets reset to blank everytime i post

>>
!LightPenis
06/09/12(Sat)03:48
No.
[_]!LightPenisNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:48
No.

  >>1694763
  testing

>>
!LightPenis
06/09/12(Sat)03:49
No.
[_]!LightPenisNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:49
No.

  >>1694766
  success

>>
Mr Ricky !Bobby.x8J2
06/09/12(Sat)03:49
No.
[_]MrRicky!Bobby.x8J2No.06/09/12(Sat)03:49
No.

  "Don't fix what isn't fucking broken" - everyone on /f/

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)03:50
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:50
No.

  >>1694762
  Though this is a minor point, I think bringing back the old style tagging leads to faster
  browsing, it's a little bit harder to browse /f/ for only [L] or only [H] since, in context of
  the entire page, you can't discern what tag it is without actually reading it.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)03:50
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:50
No.

  >>1694768
  but making it look nice wouldnt be too bad -the other guys on /f/

>>
Testing !9jPA5pCF9c
06/09/12(Sat)03:52
No.
[_]Testing!9jPA5pCF9cNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:52
No.

  Is there any chance of extending the life of popular [spoiler] Z0NE threads [/spoiler] threads?

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)03:54
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:54
No.

  >>1694772
  spoilers on /f/ would be nice
  but no every thread gets its time to shine

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)03:56
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:56
No.

  4chan x dosnt seem to work properly in threads on /f/.
  any chance you could change the format/coding to match that of other boards

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)03:59
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:59
No.

  If you're not upping the file size limit, I don't want anyone messing with /f/.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)03:59
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)03:59
No.

  new /f/ sucks ass

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)04:01
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)04:01
No.

  >>1694768
  This, fucking mods.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)04:09
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)04:09
No.

  If this is the level of service I can expect from this company, I will have to take my business
  and money elsewhere.
  .
  .
  .
  snicker

  Seriously though, it sucks.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)04:17
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)04:17
No.

  Well, it's prettier, but I don't see why this was necessary, unless it's some coding thing.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)04:24
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)04:24
No.

  This sucks.

  FYI

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)04:26
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)04:26
No.

  >>1694759
  >>1694769
  These two posts.

  Tags should really still just be one letter. It makes it much easier to skim for [L], [H], etc.
  Having porn and hentai separated is nice though.

  The filename should come before the subject too, since the filename is the most important part of
  the post.

  Get with it, coders.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)04:31
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)04:31
No.

  The changes so far either are purely upgrades or purely aesthetic, I don't see what everyone is
  bitching about? Looks great so far.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)04:32
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)04:32
No.

  Why you do this?

  Give us larger file sizes. No one here cares what the board looks like unless you change what
  we've been used to for 6 FUCKING YEARS

  All of my rage

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)04:34
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)04:34
No.

  Any chance of a filesize upgrade? Even to, say, 16,384?

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)04:35
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)04:35
No.

  >>1694802
  Or at least between 10 to 12 mb.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)04:38
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)04:38
No.

  >>1694779
  >>1694768
  >>1694801
  >>1694802
  >>1694803
  Go back to old style, upgrade the meat and potatoes not the silverware.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)04:47
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)04:47
No.

  I've been here since year fucking one.

  /f/ has always been my favorite board because it never changed. Ever.

  Thanks for ruining that.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)05:24
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)05:24
No.

  Jesus Christ, stop bitching everyone.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)05:43
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)05:43
No.

  general problems loading

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)06:10
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)06:10
No.

  I noticed a change in width just now and I approve, but I think that the tag column should
  probably be moved to either before or after the name and either color-coded or returned to the
  single-character style so you could more easily tell them apart at a glance.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)06:11
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)06:11
No.

  I think you should start banning everything that isn't 2hu on Tuesdays, that would be great!

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)06:15
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)06:15
No.

  >>1694802
  This.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)06:40
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)06:40
No.

  The only thing that bugs me is hoe far apart everything is spaced, and the use of bold text
  everywhere. It looks terrible imo.

  Also. what are the chances of getting an extra page or two instead of just one lone page?

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)06:41
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)06:41
No.

  I would love it if you kept the tags on the chart to being the one letter designation. it's a
  force of habit to see [L] over Loop.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)06:45
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)06:45
No.

  I don't like this at all.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)06:51
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)06:51
No.

  Time to get a userscript that makes it look not retarded.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)06:56
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)06:56
No.

  Honestly I liked the board how it was. It was fairly simple and you could choose what you wanted
  without having to scroll. Now it throws off my eyes a little bit

>>
Mugen7676 !z3WlfboQ5U
06/09/12(Sat)07:03
No.
[_]Mugen7676!z3WlfboQ5UNo.06/09/12(Sat)07:03
No.

  this fucking layout is annoying. its slightly more difficult to see what I am looking for. if you
  could, would you please change it back. i come here everyday and im not even sure if its worth
  the trouble, might as well lurk swfchan instead

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)07:07
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)07:07
No.

  This design style sucks so many cocks it's unbelievable. Even if you're doing it because you're
  making shit work better this is unacceptable, old /f/ was aesthetically pleasing and very
  functional, this is just HUGE BOLD LETTERS EVERYWHERE MASSIVE SPACING.
  Seriously, revert this shit.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)07:09
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)07:09
No.

  >>1694865
  any idea where I can find something like this?
  can't deal with this layout.

>>
a noob
06/09/12(Sat)07:35
No.
[_]anoobNo.06/09/12(Sat)07:35
No.

  if things don't go back i might just lurk swfchan instead; at least their layout is easier to
  look at. I come here everyday because its easy to read, now its honestly not worth the trouble.
  if we all boycott /f/ for a week or so it may open their eyes and change things back.
  >Who am I kidding, there's now one here who is willing to take a stand and fight for what they
  want. just bend over and take it.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)08:00
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)08:00
No.

  >>1694883
  ok, i'm all for getting the old look and feel back but you're just being an idiot.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)08:04
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)08:04
No.

  There was nothing wrong with old /f/. There are several problems with this new design. Do not fix
  what is not broken.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)08:04
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)08:04
No.

  The delform doesn't have the id 'delform', it breaks scripts.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)08:11
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)08:11
No.

  What the fuck is this shit?!

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)09:03
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)09:03
No.

  The flash board has become too wide. Can you bring all the file descriptions closer together so
  our eyes dont have to move so much to read?

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)09:10
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)09:10
No.

  >>1694735
  MOOT.
  WHAT THE FUCK DID YOU DO TO MY /f/?

  NOW I HAVE TO READ AN ENTIRE WORD TO KNOW IF IT IS A LOOP OR PORN.
  FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)09:11
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)09:11
No.

  >>1694924
  that's the least of this format's problems tbh.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)09:33
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)09:33
No.

  Damn, everything is so spread out.
  Whatever.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)09:38
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)09:38
No.

  >have to scroll up and down
  >have to look sideways to read labels of videos, can't just see them

  please dont ever update things and make them more cumbersome to use.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)09:55
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)09:55
No.

  Please encase the first letter in brackets like it was before.

  I've got something like this in mind
  | [?] Other |
  | [H] Hentai |
  | [L] Loop |

  Of course, I would prefer it to only be the one letter in the bracket as tags, but the examples
  above would be nice to have on /f/.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)09:59
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)09:59
No.

  That the fuck is this shit?
  Give us an "old design" choice, seriously.

  I have to narrow the browser window to get a decent looking main page, I don't know how tiny your
  screens are.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)10:02
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)10:02
No.

  I only really care about the fact that the file size and number of threads was completely ignored
  as an issue.

  Just shows how isolated and special our little corner of 4chan is, and how much the mods don't
  understand that.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)10:08
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)10:08
No.

  >>1694940

  On a positive note; at least they didn't add Captcha.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)10:50
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)10:50
No.

  to fix everybodys rage about column order, you could implement dynamic, moveable columns which
  would allow any user to organize /f/ however he wants for himself.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)10:53
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)10:53
No.

  I also believe there should be report checkboxes on the main page not the reply page

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)11:25
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)11:25
No.

  Love them centered comments.

  Oh wait no I don't. Please revert.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)11:29
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)11:29
No.

  I can't tell what is marked for deletion (old)
  And the tags are fucked, can't tell what;s [H] atsune miku.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)11:37
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)11:37
No.

  Put the comments after the tags, and make the tags one letter in brackets, and make old threads
  red and not old ones orange. then it will be good.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)11:40
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)11:40
No.

  honestly I also preferred a fixed-width /f/

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)11:43
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)11:43
No.

  All right, /f/ is fixed at last. Mostly. Do Marked for deletion (old) show up on main yet?

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)11:50
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)11:50
No.

  I guess this works, at least marginally well.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)11:52
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)11:52
No.

  This is better but still looks unappealing as fuck compared to the old version.
  Give us the option to use that one.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)12:13
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)12:13
No.

  Much much better.

  Marked for Deletion (old) needs to stand out more though. The color changes between rows makes it
  hard to see them.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)12:28
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)12:28
No.

  shitsux, bring back old /f/

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)12:28
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)12:28
No.

  The settings button points to:

  javascript:void(0);

  That doesn't seem right.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)12:33
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)12:33
No.

  How come the only thing that hasnt changed is the file size limit?
  I thought that was probably the only upgradeworthy aspect!
  its so meaningless to fuzzle with the grid
  How about pictures as replies functions, like on normal boards
  seriously if /f/ is just some abnormal board, it best stays untouched

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)12:34
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)12:34
No.

  >>1694999
  it does, but it does nothing nonetheless

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)12:34
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)12:34
No.

  >/f/ in charge of being grateful

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)12:39
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)12:39
No.

  >>1695003
  I forgot to post after my old post.

  >>1694936
  This is my old post, and THANK YOU BASED MOD FOR BRINGING BACK BRACKETED TAGS!

  <3

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)12:39
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)12:39
No.

  since when is there a mod on /f/ anyway
  looks like its just another newfag like the recent tripfags
  id rather have someone trustworthy messing with /f/
  go back to /b/ mod and keep bannhammering cp

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)12:42
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)12:42
No.

  i think its perfect now.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)12:48
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)12:48
No.

  >>1695006
  dont forget poni

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)12:51
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)12:51
No.

  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING
  REMOVE THE FUCKING USELESS SPACING

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)12:51
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)12:51
No.

  The tag selection dropdown uses just the names of the tags, while the tag column uses the letter.
  The dropdown should probably show what the letter is as well.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)12:52
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)12:52
No.

  tags not visible in reply mode
  has that been the case before?
  cant remember shit

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)12:54
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)12:54
No.

  >>1695016
  It does say tag right after the file size.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)13:00
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)13:00
No.

  Bring back the <a name> HTML tags please, and double the file size limit.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)13:02
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)13:02
No.

  Dear MOD, read this:

  http://slixor.co.uk/for_fucks_sake_fix_this_shit.png

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)13:06
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)13:06
No.

  >>1695006
  And don't forget the shitty job they did to /a/.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)13:08
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)13:08
No.

  <3 mod

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)13:13
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)13:13
No.

  This looks much better now

  testing noko

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)13:13
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)13:13
No.

  Remove the spacing and make it exactly how it used to be, make upload limit higher and leave in
  the [X] tag, then it will be good.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)13:26
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)13:26
No.

  at least you still can samefag on /f/

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)13:48
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)13:48
No.

  >>1694774
  This. I wish the /f/ boards to be extension/user-script compatible.

>>
Anonymous ## Mod
06/09/12(Sat)14:09
No.
[_]Anonymous##ModNo.
06/09/12(Sat)14:09 No.

  >>1694774
  they do, use the official extension, it works just fine.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)14:12
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)14:12
No.

  >>1695059
  It's a shame the official extension is a pile of shit.

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)14:14
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)14:14
No.

  Also the main page looks alright now, though I still prefer the old one's looks.

>>
Anonymous ## Mod
06/09/12(Sat)14:17
No.
[_]Anonymous##ModNo.
06/09/12(Sat)14:17 No.

  >>1695062
  at least it works!

  padding has been fixed and porn has been changed to [P]

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)14:20
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)14:20
No.

  Fuck you all, you made him make it look cramped and bunched up

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)14:21
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)14:21
No.

  I guess you can't please everyone

>>
Anonymous
06/09/12(Sat)14:33
No.
[_]AnonymousNo.06/09/12(Sat)14:33
No.

  Thanks for fixing the spacing

  I can actually fit it on my monitor now