File[sex-stories-first-date.swf] - (4.75 MB)
[_] [H] /r/ Inside Anonymous 05/24/12(Thu)23:23 No.

  I made a request earlier about this but the thread 404'd and somebody was close to fulfilling it,

  I'm trying to download a file from the following forum link but it requires registration and it
  appears that the registration is broken for me as I keep getting a value too short error, can
  anyone get this for me?

  http://www.desire.valdea.com/board/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=701

  previous thread
  http://boards.4chan.org/f/res/1683954

  To the guy who came close, you could try sendspace or mediafire

Marked for deletion (old).

>> [_] Anonymous 05/25/12(Fri)00:08 No.

  new mnf?

>> [_] sage sage 05/25/12(Fri)00:29 No.

  this is THE worst flash i've ever opened

  sexist to both sexes, horrible plot, awful animation and sound

  go to hell

>> [_] Anonymous 05/25/12(Fri)00:56 No.

  >>1684441
  >saging on /f/

>> [_] Anonymous 05/25/12(Fri)01:01 No.

  The only reason I stayed was for the jazz.

>> [_] sage sage 05/25/12(Fri)01:06 No.

  for fucks sake OP, arfenhouse had better animation than this shit, maybe if you didn't use such
  total SHIT your thread wouldn't 404. Fucking saged, I don't give a fuck if it doesn't do anything.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/25/12(Fri)01:10 No.

  For the love of god... This is terrible....

  >>1684460
  >>1684441
  Nice samefagging.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/25/12(Fri)01:13 No.

  >>1684460
  Geez how old are you? Threads don't 404 because they're shit, /f/ has a time limit to how long a
  thread can stay up before it automatically dies off, lurk more.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/25/12(Fri)01:13 No.

  >left arm is okay
  >DON'T YOU DARE TOUCH MY RIGHT ARM, YOU FUCKING PERVERT

>> [_] Anonymous 05/25/12(Fri)01:18 No.

  >>1684463
  you mean to tell me that if noone ever posts anything on flash, after X amount of time, flash
  will have 0 posts?

  To my knowledge, the oldest post gets bumped off the bottom when a new post is made.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/25/12(Fri)01:18 No.

  OP here, it's not "that" bad but the fact that she's always starring at the camera towards the
  viewer can be quite a turn off. Anyways I just picked this flash from random so I could make my
  request.

  BTW, there's a sequal

>> [_] Anonymous 05/25/12(Fri)01:22 No.

  >>1684468
  I never cared to learn how it works, but I think this is right. There always seems to be the same
  amount of flash files available every night.

  But then again, files getting marked for deletion? Sounds like a time-based thing

>> [_] Anonymous 05/25/12(Fri)01:22 No.

  >>1684469
  Guess what, durring the poorly animated fuck-scenes,

  well her arm is over her ass at one point, and there's a retarded hand-shaped shadow that doesn't
  move

  not to mention the terrible proportions, I mean when she's giving him a blowjob his ass is like
  this tiney little lump that starts higher up than his cock, which looks like a cardboard cut-out
  with 1 frame.

  Oh not to mention the giant black squares where the 'artist' stopped drawing...

  This is the very definition of shit. take it away and die in a fire. preferably with all
  instances of this flash, and its sequel(s) so that none may be harmed by it again.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/25/12(Fri)01:23 No.

  I'm fairly certain that posting flashes like this constitutes a war crime in most of the free
  world.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/25/12(Fri)01:24 No.

  >>1684468
  Yes. /f/ also has thing where the rate of threads 404ing changes depending on how fast people
  upload content.

  Example: If someone starts spamming a whole bunch of flashes every 2 or 3 minutes while using a
  proxy to bypass the 4 files at a time limit, threads will be marked for deletion in less than 2
  or 3 hours.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/25/12(Fri)01:28 No.

  >>1684473
  /f/ naturally has a limit to when you can post the same flash again. You'd either had to wait 2
  or 3 days until you can repost the same flash but someone could bypass this by changing the file
  size so /f/ doesn't initially recognize it

>> [_] Anonymous 05/25/12(Fri)01:30 No.

  >>1684474
  Well I have low standards so I can pretty much get off on low quality work.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/25/12(Fri)01:31 No.

  >>1684478
  Speak of the devil, it's happening to this thread now, time to start a new request thread.