File[Dye - Fantasy.swf] - (1 KB)
[_] [H] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)02:09 No.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)02:13 No.

  WOW

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)02:15 No.

  I can't say that was expected.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)02:15 No.

  .....The fuck did I just watch.png?

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)02:16 No.

  Ah, yes. This wonderful bit of animation. My dick rejoices at its presence on /f/. Good show, old
  chap.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)02:18 No.

  Ohgodwhat

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)02:19 No.

  >>1630047
  Oh please, this kinda shit happens every day on /d/
  Fapped the entire way through
  thanks muchly chum

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)02:24 No.

  I liked it, but for non-fapping reasons. (<- in denial)

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)02:28 No.

  I whatthefucked the entire video

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)02:32 No.

  Thanks OP
  Was thinking about this video today and forgot it's name.
  It's a spectacular piece of animation.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)02:32 No.

  I'm all WTF and really impressed

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)02:59 No.

  Wow.

  I'm super high and just had an awkward encounter with an old friend. That was pretty awesome, OP.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)03:09 No.

  Huh. And at first, all i was wondering was how they were going to get back out.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)03:10 No.

  Knock-knock

  who's there?

  It's French.

  Go fuck yourselves, weeaboos.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)03:13 No.

  Went she went through the bottom of the pool I was like, "Really? You're going through there?
  Where do you think 'they' came from..."

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)03:20 No.

  Fucking badass. Want more.

>> [_] Sage01 03/03/12(Sat)03:21 No.

  Fucking ancient ones terrorizing our women

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)03:31 No.

  Actually this video is a metaphor for sexuality. They start off innocent playing around in a
  pool. The guy tries to kiss her, but she's afraid of what it may lead to. When she jumps in the
  pool, it's actually metaphoric for the guy fingering her and the girl being confused/afraid. Upon
  seeing the "monsters", the guy then pentrates her. She wants to escape this mentally. When she
  escapes to the other side, her eyes are blown out which is symbolic of her virginity being lost,
  thus losing her innocence. She has now entered the world of broken innocence.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)03:31 No.

  makes me want to get into animation

>> [_] Sage01 03/03/12(Sat)03:32 No.

  >>1630088
  I can see your point, but it reminded me of lovercraft lore too much.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)03:40 No.

  >>1630088
  Thats deep yo

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)04:14 No.

  DEM ELDER GODS

  That was really cool.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)04:14 No.

  >>1630088
  And that's why I hate "art" not proper art but the constant usage of symbolism in obscure ways.
  It's neat but if the point is to convey something, you shouldn't hide under symbolism that only
  other "art" people will understand. Or if you do, do give it the general public. Now this
  animation is really good and I don't begrudge it for it's use of symbolism, since it can stand as
  an interesting piece of animation on it's own. I mostly hate still art that does this, and
  primarily abstracts. And my hatred for them taints my view of almost any "art" piece I see.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)04:16 No.

  >>1630113
  *shouldn't hide it*
  &
  *don't give it*

  Poor grammar on my part.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)04:48 No.

  >>1630088
  That's cool.
  But if you try to tell me that wasn't Shub-Nigguruth on the other side of that portal, Ima laugh
  atchu.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)04:48 No.

  >>1630088
  I absolutely HATE when people do what you just did.

  I enjoyed this on its presented merits, Some sort of lovecraftian horrors from another dimension
  turning teenagers into deep ones.

  Then you went and started spewing out that "Oh well this is actually representative of this, and
  this ACTUALLY means this, which means there wheren't really any monsters and hurp a durp a deedly
  durp"

  FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU

  THE CREATORS OF THESE THINGS DID NOT THINK SO FAR AHEAD TO GO "hay, Lets make some scary monster
  shit thats symbolic of something totally unrelated just to troll people"

  Fuck you.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)04:57 No.

  >>1630133
  Bahaha!

  Also, moral of the story, don't jump the pool while some girl is getting fingered in it.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)05:03 No.

  >>1630133

  Exactly. And this is why I switched from being an Art major. I got sick of the bullshit
  pretentious hipsters analyzing old art work as if the creator had intentionally embedded hundreds
  of symbolism/meanings in his piece as apart of some grand scheme. If you think that anon is
  annoying, then never attend an art history lecture. "hurr this piece was done in a
  manneristic-baroque style indicative of loyalty during exchange of sexual partnership and the
  water is representative of society encroaching degradation of moral ethnic values with pias
  offsets"

  i like this animation and song. i'd just like to believe there were aliens from another world
  that mind fucked these teens. /ok

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)05:04 No.

  fucking amazing

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)05:07 No.

  >>1630142
  my friend is doing some shit for lit, I don't know what, and don't give a fuck, it's making him a
  pretentious shit like that. its for lit, but he's doing this to books, movies, cartoons, most
  random shit.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)05:23 No.

  >>1630144
  Ask him about Fahrenheit 451 and what it is about. If he talks about censorship, tell him he is
  wrong.
  The book is actually about the fact the author thought TV sucked. Seriously. People have tried to
  argue to his face about what his book is about, but he maintains he wrote it and it is about the
  fact he hated television.
  Another good example is the Robert Frost poem about stopping in the woods on a snowy evening.
  Lotta people interpret it as the narrator contemplating suicide. I even had a teacher who claimed
  that. Not true at all, on the basis of the opinion of the Robert Frost expert... Robert Frost.
  Frost has another poem that is a good example of this kind of thing, the two roads leading into
  the woods one.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)05:23 No.

  >>1630144

  Art.
  Insert picture of guy with head up own ass.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)05:27 No.

  >>1630152
  "But art is about what we as viewers see in it"

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)05:28 No.

  I think the analysis where he details every little bit of the Lovecraftian nightmare having a
  real world parallel is a bit stupid.

  It definitely is about a girl being terrified by her blossoming sexuality, but that's about the
  extent of it.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)05:30 No.

  >>1630156
  It definitely is about time to shut the hell up.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)05:33 No.

  >>1630155
  If art is so objective, then there is no value in studying it because nothing real can be said
  about it.
  Alternately
  Who are you to think you know more than the creator of the piece? Who are you to even think you
  can know if or what they meant beyond what is presented? How could someone be so presumptuous.
  Or
  You speak of applicability yet say allegory. You don't even know what you mean by your own words;
  how can you know what the author means by his?

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)05:39 No.

  I does not matter what the author claims a piece of art is about. It's how the spectator
  interprets the art what really matters. Art can is an unique experience and all those who claims
  they know all about art and how it should be received can go to hell.

>> [_] writer 03/03/12(Sat)05:43 No.

  what the fuck did I just watch

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)05:44 No.

  my eyes would explode too if i witnessed all of 4chan in 1 day being an "internet virigin"

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)05:47 No.

  >>1630152
  Literary analysis is, more often than not, based upon the idea that the writer's opinion on the
  work's meaning is no more significant than anyone else's. The question isn't about what the
  writer intended; it's about what the work means to the reader.

  I mean, if the work a perfect representation of the intentions of the writer, then you wouldn't
  NEED to analyze anything.

  Also, I need to stop hanging out with Liberal Arts majors.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)05:47 No.

  This is similar to when i fucked the first time. little bit curious. little bit shocked. somewhat
  grossed and full of guilt. nobody forgets their first fuck

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)05:55 No.

  If someone critics art at you, just ask them to describe the color blue without using any
  physical reference, like an object or place.

  Disagree.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)05:58 No.

  >>1630161
  The message the author sends is not the message I receive.

  The message I receive is meaningful to me.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)05:59 No.

  >>1630174
  Noted.

  Otherwise, awesome video.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)06:02 No.

  This video i's a metaphor for the never predictable outcome of every day life.

  Just as you can go for a simple walk, and take whatever precautions there may be taken, you never
  know if you'll end up being run over by a car or joining an awesome party being held on a nearby
  plaza.

  It's the same in this video. No matter what precautions you take, you never know if an innocent
  breaking-and-entering pool party will end up with you getting wet and drunk, or if you end up
  becoming a part of an Elder God.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)06:14 No.

  >>1630178
  The only thing Robert Frost disliked was someone trying to place an analysis as absolute and
  nothing else could be "the answer".
  David Lynch had the same views for his films as well -- whatever you take away from it is the
  answer.
  Which leads to this:
  >>1630172
  Which leads to this:
  >>1630152

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)06:19 No.

  >>1630180
  I need to be clearer when i sarcastically analyze stuff. I though the Elder God thing sold it
  like that.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)06:34 No.

  >>1630180
  >Only thing robert frost disliked

  Not true. He disliked people in general.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)06:36 No.

  >>1630181
  Art criticism and those who consider themselves art critics are so stupid that Poe's Law is in
  full swing, I'm sorry to say.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)06:37 No.

  >>1630187
  Eh, point taken.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)06:38 No.

  >>1630172
  >>1630165
  No.
  Death of the Author is a concept that is pretentious and needs to die.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)06:59 No.

  Invoking Godwin's Law I guess.
  You're all Hitler.

  Also I am Hitler.

>> [_] !!qdvBtKFtNy6 03/03/12(Sat)07:09 No.

  Bit short, could be longer.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)07:12 No.

  >>1630142
  >I got sick of the bullshit pretentious hipsters analyzing old art work as if the creator had
  intentionally embedded hundreds of symbolism/meanings in his piece as apart of some grand scheme.
  I think most of that symbolism works on a subconscious level so you do not have to "see" it for
  your brain to make the connection. Take the analysis of full metal jacket:
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LqGu3oYj54
  I think our brain picks lots of those up and produces certain "feelings" which make the film
  great. Same goes with hidden sexual meanings in lots of works of art. Someone in Art may have to
  understand those concepts to use them but the effect should be there without having to be told.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)07:36 No.

  or hes a lunatic
  and im sick of weird crap on youtube
  wtf is wrong with the people who control youtube they go ohh look here's a woman showing her tits
  its for education
  fuck that i don't even have to be 18 to make and account
  and i don't need an account to view that wtf

  and i hate my messed up generation with their shitty music tastes

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)07:41 No.

  This video is a metaphor for my dick and how it rips open and terrifies women.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)08:11 No.

  >>1630206
  The ones that are educational and not sexual are fine
  It's like saying that the baby must be blind-folded during breastfeeding so it isn't exposed to
  "such a sexual thing" so early in life.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)08:43 No.

  Artistic study is, in itself, not pretentious. I did go to art school and will say, yes, most
  critiques and galleries are artists and peers stroking each others ego's with how smart they can
  be. When I go with my friends, though, I can look at paintings, and have a discussion with any
  half intelligent person about it without losing them unless I intend to. Perhaps >>1630088
  had a very detailed breakdown, but i don't think there is a question that there's some kind of
  symbolism here. There usually is in almost any form of art. That doesn't mean analysis is
  automatically hipster pretension.
  >>1630113
  But this is the opposite side of the spectrum. might as well just wave a shotgun at people and
  shout about yer grass, pa.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)09:00 No.

  that was really nice op, cheers

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)09:08 No.

  >>1630133
  What this guy said.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)09:11 No.

  Also stop quoting shitty "laws" that no normal person bothers to learn and have to lookup every
  time some guy uses them just so that we can understand what he is talking about.

  It's annoying and not really "laws" in any way. It's more like a funny saying. Just say the
  saying, for example "anything that can go wrong will go wrong". Dont say OH MAN THE DERP LAW.
  That's gay.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)09:35 No.

  People, sometimes the artist isn't completely conscious of what he's doing. Actually, that's most
  of the time.

  True art is always deliberate up to a point. Joyce wrote Ulysses with the intent of conveying an
  infinite number of messages. Ipso facto, he couldn't know about all of them.

  So people who go "the artist never meant that" are ignorant fucks.

  Now, back to my ivory tower.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)09:54 No.

  >Ipso facto
  Stop using crap phrases that less than 1% of the population knows about. A good writer/speaker
  uses words that are as simple as possible so that they can communicate with as wide audience as
  possible.

  In this case it would have been better to write "By definition" instead of using "Ipso facto" to
  try and sound smart or well educated.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/03/12(Sat)10:03 No.

  Wow, don't see this many replies every day