File[INFLATION.swf] - (3.47 MB)
[_] [L] Anonymous 05/05/12(Sat)22:37 No.1671897
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 05/06/12(Sun)05:39 No.1672048
I WANTED INFLATION FETISH NOT THIS RON PAUL AMERICA BULLSHIT
>> [_] Anonymous 05/06/12(Sun)11:38 No.1672136
I sort of lost the explanation that was trying to be given when he roped employment into the
works, and he never expanded on that point (next reel?). His "interest" explanation also skipped
over a logical point: if the money borrowed balloons into more money, and some of it is held back
for security purposes, then doesn't a source of interest get created in that ballooning? The
actual question is access, which I think is where he was going with the employment angle, but he
introduced it poorly.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/06/12(Sun)11:47 No.1672139
Alright, so next question: What do you want us to do about it?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/06/12(Sun)12:00 No.1672141
stop bumping this
>> [_] Financial Services Guy !!irpohcY63Wp 05/06/12(Sun)12:17 No.1672150
>still pushes the "debt virus" theory as if it's a legit concern
HAHAH holy shit. This was debunked ages ago.
http://www.famguardian.org/Subjects/MoneyBanking/FederalReserve/FRconspire/antidote.htm
>> [_] Anonymous 05/06/12(Sun)12:37 No.1672164
He dosen't seem to understand that when somone brings together the factors of production to
create goods and services there is new value created. The money supply then increases to handle
this. In flation is created when demand increases faster than our capacity to produce. But so
long as there is economic growth, non inflationary increases to the money supply are fine.
