File: Zeta R02's Breeding Experiments.swf-(162 KB, Hentai)
[_] fap fap fap fap Anonymous 07/18/12(Wed)10:10 No.1722573
>> [_] Anonymous 07/18/12(Wed)11:12 No.1722599
That's not how penises work
>> [_] Anonymous 07/18/12(Wed)11:33 No.1722607
I hate it whenever someone depicts cum-inflation like this. If there was enough pressure to cause
cum to eject through your belly button 1) the cum would exit around the penis first, 2) if the
navel was ruptured, everything would come out, and 3) you would DIE.
Forget the usual suspension of disbelief over vaginal and uterine stretchiness, or how much that
kind of rapid expansion would generally hurt. If something in your vagina comes out through your
belly button, a serious hole has been ripped in your body, and you're pretty fucked.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/18/12(Wed)11:38 No.1722610
>>1722607
>fictional character fantasy sex
>anatomy and physics
Okay.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/18/12(Wed)12:02 No.1722624
>>1722610
Imagine a scale of one to six. On one end is "Totally possible stuff". On the other end is
"Completely impossible stuff". It looks something like this:
1 - Totally Possible
2 - Generally Possible
3 - Unlikely, but Possible
4 - Generally Improbable
5 - Highly Improbable
6 - Completely Impossible
On the '1' end we have completely unkinky sex. 2 is stuff not everyone can do, but is possible,
like deepthroating or sounding. 3 is stuff that is possible, but is probably dangerous and
difficult to do, like large insertions. 4 is the more questionable stuff that seems possible but
might not be, like inflation. 5 is stuff that has some basis in reality, but would need
exceptional circumstances to happen, like all-the-way through. 6 is stuff that is literally
impossible, regardless of the desires of the viewers, like nipple fucking.
This is a 5. I prefer 2 through 4.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/18/12(Wed)12:03 No.1722625
>>1722624
>caring about how possible fictional sex with a fictional character in a fictional setting is
>> [_] Anonymous 07/18/12(Wed)12:13 No.1722629
>>1722624
>full autism
>> [_] Anonymous 07/18/12(Wed)12:29 No.1722637
>>1722624
>probably totally normal looking guy
>harbors secret need to insert worms into urethra
>> [_] Anonymous 07/18/12(Wed)13:21 No.1722663
>>1722624
Nipple fucking is possible with invasive surgery, so that's probably not the best example.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/18/12(Wed)13:46 No.1722678
>>1722663
Is it, though? I mean, has anyone ever had fuckablenippleplasty? Theoretically possible isn't the
same as possible.
