File: zeitgeist-auto.swf-(95 KB, Loop)
[_] Anonymous 04/17/13(Wed)04:00 No.1945929
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 04/17/13(Wed)04:02 No.1945931
get lost shitgeist
>> [_] zeitgeist 04/17/13(Wed)04:17 No.1945942
>>1945931
make me leave.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/17/13(Wed)06:43 No.1945997
zeitgiest wants to setup skynet and release terminators on us
>> [_] Anonymous 04/17/13(Wed)09:52 No.1946050
tl;dr
>> [_] sage 04/17/13(Wed)12:08 No.1946113
tl:dr
>> [_] sage 04/17/13(Wed)12:09 No.1946114
watch?v=xIwK7nykfCQ
>> [_] Anonymous 04/17/13(Wed)12:15 No.1946117
>extrapolating current technologies to future applications
Not necessarily factually incorrect, but debatable enough to make it hilariously foolish to base
an entire political ideology around it.
And, let's face it, would these technologies actually develop, they would trigger a natural shift
in our economy to basically what you're describing without the need to tear down literally every
piece of infrastructure we have. Just look at how many people we can afford to keep on food
stamps and section 8 housing.
If you really want to make a difference, get a degree in mech/robotic/electrical/software
engineering and actually develop these technologies, instead of trying to prop up uneducated sci
fi fantasy worlds as a legitimate solution to the world's problems. This is some serious OWS-tier
shit.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/17/13(Wed)12:18 No.1946120
Also you're shoehorning your political beliefs into what is supposed to be a casual
content-sharing board, and spamming it incessantly at that. I don't understand even if you don't
give a fuck about /f/ how you think you're doing anything but pissing people off and turning them
off completely from your movement.
Think of it this way, how many jehovah's witnesses do you think ACTUALLY get people to convert by
interrupting their day?
How many people do you think they turn off completely from their faith, and making them think
they're weird and invasive, by doing so?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/17/13(Wed)12:23 No.1946124
>>1946117
>being Tesla
>being God-tier inventor
>invented fuckload of prosperous shit
>government bought most of my patterns to pick up dust because it's money greeding bitch
>> [_] sage sage 04/17/13(Wed)12:55 No.1946146
Robots will be doing some of the work that humans used to do. This is not news to me. I am not
shocked surprised or entertained.
>"Employment is Inverse to Productivity"
Yeah you are wrong about that. Even if we can mechanize a lot of factory work we still need
service jobs. And a lot of factory work can be done cheaper buy a human then a robot. Work that
changes a lot for example.
I would like to congratulate you on your perpetual joblessness and quest to start a communist
revolution.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/17/13(Wed)13:01 No.1946159
>>1946146
like even if all jobs are going to be replaced by robots (this wont happen not even the 95% you
claim). You wont need a violent revolution. The average hours for a full time worker will be
shrunk from 40 to 30 then to 20 to 10 to 5 to 0. It will happen gradually over time and wont
require a violent revolution.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/17/13(Wed)13:02 No.1946160
>>1946146
>quest to start a communist revolution.
Everyone goes for the redbaiting, without fail.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/17/13(Wed)13:03 No.1946164
>>1946160
If not for a revolution (only to find out they are wrong) why would they tell me this? Its not
need to know info.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/17/13(Wed)13:11 No.1946169
>>1945942
We have better things to do with our time, unlike you.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/17/13(Wed)13:16 No.1946172
/f/ needs fucking chapta.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/17/13(Wed)13:26 No.1946182
>>1946172
please rot in a hole...
>do never say shit like that
>> [_] Anonymous 04/17/13(Wed)13:27 No.1946183
>>1946172
how new are you?
