File: FluShotsGiveYouDopeMoves.swf-(5.96 MB, 450x300, Loop)
[_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)01:01 No.2011537
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)01:08 No.2011545
Idiots + Media
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)01:33 No.2011565
Funny that people believed she was telling the truth for so long.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)01:51 No.2011587
This is called JAQing off. (Just Asking Question)
Have you killed a five year old girl? I'm not saying that you have, I'm just asking questions,
but the fact I'm actually asking this question does lend credibility to the possibility you did
kill a 5 year old girl. You can tell me that these questions are inappropriate and I understand,
but if I can't ask them, isn't that sorta hiding the truth? I'm just trying to find the answers
and all you're doing is stopping me from doing that. Why?
See what I did there?
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:10 No.2011604
>>2011587
It's what fucking every news-esque website does.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:11 No.2011606
>>2011565
It's because of that whole movement of mentally handicapped parents that think vaccines can cause
autism in children, despite the fact that the whole thing was a hoax brought on by an asshole who
was just trying to discredit one vaccine so that he could sell you HIS vaccine instead, and is
now no longer to practice medicine.
Since people in the US believe that everything is governed by magic, anything is possible at any
time for any reason if you REALLY BELIEVE. Thus they believed in vaxtardation, and they believed
in this.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:18 No.2011611
>>2011606
Are you speaking as a U.S. citizen or as a European (or any other)? Honestly, speaking as a
citizen, I agree but saying things from an outside context makes you sound like a lalilulelo.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:21 No.2011614
>>2011611
So, you think that comment is correct, but only if it's by another american; otherwise they're an
asshole? If the US was more open to taking advice from other countries, it probably wouldn't be
two thirds shitbucket right now.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:22 No.2011615
>>2011614
No. I think it's correct. I just think that outside context sounds like blatant patriotism.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:23 No.2011617
>>2011614
Also, I'm not trying to call you an asshole. Just trying to advise you on how to sound neutral
when expressing a not so neutral point of view. Safe, if you would.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:26 No.2011622
>>2011606
unfortunately true, some student down in LA had a petition to ban dhydrogen monoxide, he gave a
speech about its dangers and so many people just blindly signed it.
and what is DHMO?
fucking water, makes me ashamed that I come from California
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:26 No.2011623
>>2011615
How can you come across as patriotic and also not give an impression as to your nationality?
Aren't those kind of mutually exclusive?
Also, the comment, while factious, is still accurate; accuracy is not partisan.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:29 No.2011624
>>2011622
See, if the US had a little more money per student in education dollars, that sort of shit
wouldn't go down. Similarly, people would have laughed off the word "organic" to describe
produce, and people wouldn't be afraid of "chemicals" in their food. The fact that those words
have been given new meanings (unmodified/pest control free, and synthetic, respectively) is a
serious indictment of what the education system is accomplishing.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:30 No.2011625
IT NEVER GETS OLD
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:31 No.2011626
>>2011623
I can't understand what's being said in the first question. This may not be an error on your part
as I sometimes have problems processing certain phrases or questions.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:35 No.2011627
>>2011626
You said: "I just think that outside context sounds like blatant patriotism.", implying that the
criticism, if delivered from a non-american, sounds like patriotism. You also admitted that you
can't tell if the comment is american or not.
But patriotism is the love, defense or bolstering of your particular nation; how can the
statement be patriotic if you can't tell what country it's originating from?
I mean, I know some people stateside think otherwise, but there is actually no country that
prides itself on hating or criticizing America. None. So how could criticizing the US come across
as patriotic?
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:35 No.2011628
>>2011624
actually it's more of a "I wud rathir be off gettin pragnent and colekt muh welfro check then not
haf to uttend no skooling" type of attitude that is present in the south, and urban societies,
TL;DR poor hoodniggas and rednecks blame education for their problems, they fail because they
don't care, and only attend because the government makes them do it
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:39 No.2011632
>>2011627
Although I don't entirely know if you're an American or not, your words such as "they" sound like
they're coming from an outside point of view which would suggest a European viewpoint because
Europeans tend to be interested in our politics for some reason (This is not meant to sound
insulting).
Also, I think our definitions of patriot might be different in this context. I generally mean to
refer to someone as a patriot as a negative term like someone who prefers an xbox over anything
else simply because it's an xbox. Remember, I never called you a patriot. I simply warned you
that you might sound like one.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:41 No.2011633
>>2011627
Sorry if my terminology may come off as weird but I prefer to take an implied approach to things
that way I can try to get the other person to see things from my perspective or at least a
perspective that isn't theirs.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:41 No.2011634
>>2011633
Also, I think that might be a massive fucking run-on sentence.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:45 No.2011637
>>2011628
Yeah, but the dumbest of asses are only part of the problem, and the more educated the rest of
the country is, the harder it'll be for them to stay so retarded.
The big problem is middle-class stupid. The idiots that graduated highschool, probably did a
community college thing, or dropped out of a real college. They know enough to sound like they're
smart, but their heads are completely fucking empty. These are the idiots that obsess over diet
fads, and think Web MD is as good as medical insurance, because they're clever.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:45 No.2011638
>>2011637
They're smart enough to do menial office work, usually, but they're not bright enough to actually
make good decisions. They think they're smart, so they devalue the opinions of the actually
qualified, and by extension they legitimize the idiocy of the really stupid (who in turn, think
they are as smart as the middle-class-idiots).
You need critical mass; once there are enough basically intelligent people, the idiots start to
fall in line because they can't fake their way ahead. Then things return to a meritocracy where
actually knowing shit is required to net success.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:47 No.2011641
>>2011632
Well, you might consider using words that fit the meaning you want, better. Instead of patriotic,
you might try biased, or describe it as "canned rhetoric". You have options.
>>2011634
It is; you need a period right... here: "approach to things. That way"
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:54 No.2011651
>>2011641
Hm. I don't think those words fit the context just right but they are helpful, nonetheless.
Also, thanks for pointing out where the period should go. I'm depriving myself of sleep like an
idiot and so my brain is fucking up in ways it shouldn't.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)02:56 No.2011654
>>2011651
Well, I mean that they fit the context but not in the manner that I'd truly like. Like wanting a
slight oval instead of a perfect circle.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/22/13(Sat)03:03 No.2011661
>>2011654
I getcha. The dialog is appreciated, none the less!
