File: 1x61 hues of not megumi.swf-(399 KB, 800x700, Loop)
[_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)20:18 No.

  Fixed .wav so that it loops better now

  /r/equesting images to replace this with

>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)20:22 No.

  too lazy to count to almost a hundred. Is dis for real?

>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)20:28 No.

  >>2206281
  Name was suggested by another anon

  What would you choose?

>> [_] Soviet Russia !lM51PoudCg 12/03/13(Tue)20:29 No.

  >>2206281
  No, I think there's actually 64.

  >>2206292
  1x64 hues would probably be best.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)20:30 No.

  >>2206296
  Name down, better image?

>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)20:32 No.

  >>2206296
  1xNumber means it's in hexadecimal. 1x64 would be 100 hues.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)20:34 No.

  >>2206296
  >>2206301
  0x is hexadecimal. 0x40 is 64 in base 10. 1x61 is nonsense.

>> [_] Soviet Russia !lM51PoudCg 12/03/13(Tue)20:35 No.

  >>2206301
  That's what 0x indicates, 0x40 is 64, 1x a number is just a standard math equation.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)20:36 No.

  >>2206281
  >>2206296
  colors = new Array();
  colors[0] = "black";
  .....
  colors[63] = "white";

  There are 64. Which is 0x40 in Hex

>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)20:36 No.

  Why does the flash have the name Anonymous D and a trip, but not OP? What's the point of
  including that in the flash?

>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)20:36 No.

  >>2206306
  >>2206308
  my bad.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)20:36 No.

  Yes. This. Exactly this.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)20:37 No.

  >>2206311
  Because the flash was originally made by anonymous D, not OP. This is an edit.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)20:40 No.

  >>2206274
  You should just make a string of images the viewer can swap through.

  It would be easier and neater than choosing one image to fit, could be stuff like this current
  one or even the original megumi image. The possibilities are endless

>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)20:41 No.

  >>2206317
  Who says OP isn't Anonymous D? He has been pretty active lately.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)20:42 No.

  >>2206329
  Why would he make an edit of one of his older flashes that's not as good as the original?

>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)20:44 No.

  >>2206330
  Premise, the possibilities

  >>2206325
  Also thanks, Ill get on that

>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)20:54 No.

  >>2206338
  0x40x0x40 (hues, not megumis)

>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)21:00 No.

  >>2206325
  Im trying to find the original, having some difficulties

>> [_] Anonymous D !Noy5sI6il. 12/03/13(Tue)21:11 No.

  >>2206329
  Yeah, I didn't do this edit. Although I am curious how OP swapped out the image and kept
  everything else intact. What kind of decompiler and tools are you using?

>> [_] Anonymous 12/03/13(Tue)21:11 No.

  >>2206379
  I'm not OP but I think SWFTools can swap out objects by ID