TYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-tr
ansitional.dtd"> #RSS
[Burichan] [Futaba] - [WT] [Home] [Manage]
[777/gfx][a/ani/co/fit/halp/kitchen/lit/me/pr/psych/sci/tg/toys/vg/w/wp/x/zom][b/cak
e/d/di/elit/fl/gu/h/men/n/nb/pco/s/sho/ss/unf ]
[IMG]/fl/ - Flash
________________________________________________________________________________
[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
____________________________Name ____________________________
Email ____________________________
Subject ___________________________________ Reply (reply to 251)
Message
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
File ___________________________________
Password ________ (for post and file deletion)
* Supported file types are: SWF
* Maximum file size allowed is 15648 KB.
* Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
* Currently 856 unique user posts. View catalog
* Blotter updated: 2009-04-16 Show/Hide Show All
* 04/16/09 - Lucky Numbers: 7,25,38
________________________________________________________________________________
File Dance!.swf - (450.08KB , 550x400 )
[IMG][_] &!V/Pf1aixzs!!SwBQDkBQZ2 09/04/13(Mon)21:33 No. 251
Dance
Marked for deletion (old)
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/14(Tue)06:47 No. 269
File KungFuButterfly.swf - (1.46MB , 256x240 )
[IMG]
>> [_] nerdok 09/04/18(Sat)18:56 No. 562
>>251
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD WAT IS THIS SONG?
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/18(Sat)19:08 No. 566
Run-D.M.C. f/ Jermaine Dupri - It's Over.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/18(Sat)20:35 No. 582
>>566
It's actually an MTV mashup between Run-D.M.C. and the Pixies, to be specific.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/18(Sat)20:47 No. 584
>>562
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD WHY DON'T YOU SPELL CORRECTLY?
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/18(Sat)21:34 No. 594
>>584
Wat is an acceptable alternative to what, you cock-licking assnugget.
>> [_] Anonymous ## Mod ## 09/04/20(Mon)22:39 No. 774
>>584
wat
>> [_] M.T. Calories 09/04/24(Fri)04:58 No. 913
>>582
bump for link to d/l of this version of the song.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/24(Fri)07:13 No. 915
>>594
No, it isn't. Look it up in a motherfucking dictionary. If you meant that it was "acceptable" on
the chans, then I guess that's right.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/24(Fri)11:34 No. 918
>>915
Am I mistaken, are we not on a chan? Wat's that? We are? THEN WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU BITCHING!
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/24(Fri)13:15 No. 921
>>918
Technically, that last sentence should've ended with a question mark instead of an exclamation
mark.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/24(Fri)13:24 No. 922
>>921
I would have gone for ?! personally.
>> [_] M.T. Calories 09/04/24(Fri)15:47 No. 924
You fucking grammar nazi's, shut the fuck up.
Does anyone have a link to d/l this version of this song?
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/24(Fri)17:23 No. 926
>>921
Tell me, mister Smartypants, what happens when you exclaim a question!
>>922
I believe this is not 'technically' correct.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/25(Sat)00:06 No. 942
>>926
Language is defined by the culture that uses it.
since *chans have thir own cuture shouldn't they have their own variation of English?(if said
chan is English)
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/25(Sat)03:12 No. 949
>>926
"Mister" should have been capitalised. As for what happens when you place an exclamation mark at
the end of a question, it becomes a statement. However, given your use of the word "why" in that
sentance, the context had already been established as interrogative. Therefore, to not place a
question mark at any point in the finalizing punctuation is a grammatical fallacy. In layman's
terms, it makes you fucking wrong unless you are a linguistic artist.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/25(Sat)12:21 No. 955
>>913
Here you go.
http://www.mediafire.com/?nqjrtdfhizz
Just in case you're wondering, there doesn't seem to be an "uncensored" version of it anywhere on
the tubes. So... this is as good as it gets.
