File :[anon_partyhard2.swf] - (604 KB)
[_] [L] all other party hards are cheap imitations Anonymous 06/03/09(Wed)08:29 No.995129
>> [_] Anonymous 06/03/09(Wed)10:45 No.995187
Christ, sauce on song?
>> [_] Anonymous 06/03/09(Wed)10:52 No.995189
Wow, definitely want sauce on that song!
>> [_] Anonymous 06/03/09(Wed)11:17 No.995208
Andrew W.K. - Party hard.
delivered
>> [_] Anonymous 06/03/09(Wed)12:31 No.995244
i disagree, all other party hards are just as good - if not better since they are cleaner.
if it's the song you are so stiff over it is also in aph #30
>> [_] Anonymous 06/03/09(Wed)13:16 No.995264
>>995244 other party hards are just as good - if not better since they are cleaner.
They lack the 2 frame flashes which are synonymous with PARTY HARD!
They missed the point completely and turned PARTY HARD! into an excuse to share someone's shitty
taste in music.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/03/09(Wed)13:42 No.995280
I miss that flash saying: "/f/ is where the party's at"
>> [_] Anonymous 06/03/09(Wed)14:48 No.995322
Andrew WK Is a faggot
HAR DE HAR HAR DE HAR HAR DE HAR
Gimmmie a break.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/03/09(Wed)15:17 No.995332
>>995322
>>995244
THe other party hard makers didn't draw the goddamn dancing anon themselves. They rely on the
original for that, and are therefore by definition imitation.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/03/09(Wed)15:30 No.995336
>>995332
who cares about imitation? ok there's you but thats about it.
>>995264
uh-huh, and the original doesn't? first version didnt even have the gif animation in the flash,
zone just put it there for some fucking reason (probably broke under the faggot pressure of
people whining about it not being two frames). i just think that gif is out of place, and it
certaintly doesn't automagically make this flash two frames. tl;dr: original isn't any better
