File :[kipfox_kip-twinkle-sez_clap.swf] - (573 KB)
[_] [H] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)09:12 No.998080
Double you're pleasure, double the fun :D
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)09:14 No.998082
No. It's double the pleasure, TRIPLE the fun.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)09:45 No.998109
Nothing better than generic porn music accompanying a boring furry flash using stock sounds.
Yep.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)09:55 No.998117
>>998109
You mean there's absolutely nothing WORSE than generic porn music accompanying a boring furry
fla-- OHHHH.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)10:04 No.998126
Bump for pointless yet amusing rage.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)10:07 No.998129
>>998126
Where's the rage? I was hoping for something good as I liked some other twinkle ones. This one is
the poorest one I've seen yet for the reasons outlined here >>998109
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)10:08 No.998131
It's a trap!
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)10:11 No.998135
>>998129
Well, whether or not it's you, trust me - there's rage out there. But yeah, this probably ain't
one of Twinkle's better efforts. Kinda like how Zone started making all those lame loops.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)10:19 No.998140
>>998135
At least Zone kept the art and animation quality up reasonably high. The Zone loops were
basically mini sections on a par with a similarly short section from a full piece, so I rather
liked some of them. In this case I would have believed this was some very early work from Twinkle
if I hadn't seen the date stamp in the corner. Very disappointing. It's like he didn't care at
all.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)10:49 No.998160
>>998140
Considering it says Twinkle '09 in the corner, I don't think it's his earlier work
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)10:53 No.998162
>>998160
>>998140 In this case I would have believed this was some very early work from Twinkle if I
hadn't seen the date stamp in the corner.
Ahem. :P
I kind of wished it was though. Or maybe a fake. At least that would explain why this was so bad.
A step backwards for him.
>> [_] double your pleasure rodimaxus 06/06/09(Sat)11:05 No.998166
double anal?! NICE I like it
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)11:06 No.998169
>>998166
That's what gets me. How the hell can they do that if there's only one entrance?
>> [_] (<$Trojan$>) 06/06/09(Sat)11:29 No.998177
FUCK OFF FURRYS!!
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)11:32 No.998180
SLAP SLAP SLAP
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)12:13 No.998205
<3<3<3<3<3
>> [_] Guodzilla 06/06/09(Sat)12:21 No.998212
>>998129
Actually, the term you're looking for is
"Sarcasm."
Yep.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)12:33 No.998222
>>998212
No it isn't.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)12:52 No.998234
That's gotta hurt.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)13:47 No.998285
The buttons, they do nothing.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)14:30 No.998306
>>998234
If you can take an anal fisting then you can take two dicks.
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)15:11 No.998345
sage for furry
>> [_] Anonymous 06/06/09(Sat)16:01 No.998390
>>998345
slowpoke.jpg
