STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR | Archived flashes: 228136 |
/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/ | P0001 · P2561 · P5122 |
This is resource BMRCOWC, an Archived Thread.
Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/2432575 Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 59. Discovered flash files: 1 File: Surveillance Camera Man.swf-(9.15 MB, 240x176, Other) [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)17:42 No.2432575 Marked for deletion (old). >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)17:47 No.2432583 suervelianse >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)17:48 No.2432585 Americans Yes, they are this aggressive. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)17:48 No.2432586 "calm down." I love the way he says that. like >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)17:49 No.2432587 >>2432585 the chinese dudes get pretty fucking pissed too honestly, what would you do if you're minding your own business and the next thing you know someone is pointing a camera right in your face? >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)17:50 No.2432589 >>2432585 is there any country where you could do this and 90% of them WOULDN'T flip the fuck out? like, maybe actually enjoy their life for a time? I'd like to move there >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)17:54 No.2432597 >>2432589 Sorry people don't like having a camera shoved in their face. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)17:56 No.2432601 >>2432597 It's just a camera. You don't have to lose your shit. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)17:56 No.2432602 Calm down, guys. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)17:58 No.2432605 >>2432601 You seriously don't get how people would have a problem with this? >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:01 No.2432613 the reason why people get agressive is that they don't know with what purpose are they getting filmed so here comes the imagination flowing through their scared little minds so imho they are being too precautious that's all >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:02 No.2432615 >>2432605 It's not like he's filming them in their own fucking houses or something. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:02 No.2432617 >>2432605 I do, but people are still overly aggressively. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:07 No.2432624 Isn't it illegal to film people without their permission? >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:11 No.2432630 >>2432624 No. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:12 No.2432631 Women can be registered sex offenders? >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:19 No.2432640 I understand is annoying. but, you people need to calm the fuck down. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:22 No.2432643 >>2432624 No. You have no expectation of privacy in a public place. If you don't want to be photographed or videotaped, don't go outdoors. If there were any kind of laws against photographing or recording people without their express permission, photography would be absolutely fucked. Big news story? Well, too bad, you gotta get permission from all 200 people gawking at the house burning down or the giant pileup on the highway. On vacation and want to take photos? Better get permission from everybody else at the Statue of Liberty that day or you might take someone's photo on accident. Big crowd at the convention? Might as well forget it, someone might flip out if you're taking a picture of someone while they're standing behind them. What amuses me is how people get intensely riled up about Joe Sixpack with his smartphone or Douche McFaggot with his Google Glasses when nobody cares about surveillance cameras recording everything you do, everywhere you do. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:25 No.2432645 he fucking followed him, what do you expect? >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:31 No.2432657 >>2432643 >What amuses me is how people... Um, that was the point of this video. However, I think there's more to it than that. First of all, 7-Elevens and Banks and such have an unambiguous and well-known motive for operating security cameras. Nobody has to ask "why is that camera here? What are you going to do with the video?" They are also confined to well-defined "private" spaces. Some banks and such have cameras on the outside of the building too, but they are clearly intended to secure their own premises. (field too long) >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:32 No.2432658 >>2432643 In germany we have this regulation that it's allowed to take pictures of people, but you're not allowed to publish them without their permission. Exception is if the picture isn't explicitely about them and they just happen to be on it like on a group shot or in the background. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:32 No.2432659 >>2432657 (continued) A guy on the street holding a video camera at eye-level is not equivalent to these security cameras at all. For one, this cameraman singled individuals out, rather than merely recording an entire area. He filmed people in public spaces that aren't owned by anybody, in which people do not expect to be recorded. When you walk into a store you aren't surprised in the least to see a camera there, but when you are talking on the phone on the sidewalk, you don't expect to be recorded. Finally, the biggest difference here is that this cameraman's intentions are totally unclear. People wouldn't react like this if they were accidentally photographed by tourists, because they understand immediately why the picture is being taken and what it is being used for. People don't react like this when they walk by a TV camera set up in front of a news reporter, either--if anything, they are excited and curious about what newsworthy event is happening. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:38 No.2432662 >>2432658 Germany also has laws prohibiting certain uses of a four-sided shape. It's not comparable to a situation in a country with extremely broad personal freedoms. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:39 No.2432664 >>2432662 freedom stops where the freedom of other people begins >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:41 No.2432666 >>2432664 What about my freedom not to suffer your existence? Does that give me the right to kill you? Etc. In the United States, this catchy little platitude is not applicable. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:41 No.2432667 that guy eating french fries while listening to opera or whatever >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:43 No.2432669 >>2432666 Are you stupid? It's exactly the other way round. You don't have the right to kill me because I have the right to live. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:45 No.2432672 >>2432669 Protesters have the right to shout at me even if it annoys me when I'm on my way to the abortion clinic. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:45 No.2432673 >>2432669 Americans aren't known to be particularly smart. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:46 No.2432676 >>2432672 Yes they do. However they do not have the right to stop you. Because they don't have unlimited freedom. It stops where your rights begin. I really don't get how you have a hard time grasping this concept >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:47 No.2432679 murica discusson incoming bump for continued butthurt >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:47 No.2432681 >>2432643 That's true but there's a difference between doing something as a form or art or informational purposes and stepping into peoples business establishments (private property), and personal space (anywhere less than 1 - 3 ft (0.3 to 0.9m) ) without explicit permission.. This guy was harassing people in public with his camera and stepping into private establishments to film without permission. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:49 No.2432683 >>2432659 >>2432657 finally, I've understood this from day 1 it's good to see others get the point of these videos as well >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:50 No.2432685 >>2432676 What about my right to have a peaceful abortion? >> [_] Ukraine 06/27/14(Fri)18:50 No.2432686 Ill pay someone to do that to Putin >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:50 No.2432687 >>2432673 says the yuropoor >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:51 No.2432688 >>2432605 Just taking a video man. That pharmacy you went? It had cameras. Just taking a video >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:52 No.2432691 >>2432685 They can't do shit about you having an abortion if it's legal in your state >> [_] ass 06/27/14(Fri)18:52 No.2432693 >>2432679 Can you into /f/? pls newfeg >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:53 No.2432695 >>2432589 anywhere in Europe >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:55 No.2432696 >>2432685 You don't have a right to it, you have the freedom to it, so it's up to chance. >Yuropoors in charge of understanding the difference between freedom and rights >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)18:56 No.2432697 >>2432589 >is there any country where you could do this and 90% of them WOULDN'T flip the fuck out? Almost everywhere, including America. No on minded all the surveillance cameras on every street corner, they seem pretty chill about it. They're also pretty all right with NSA spying and sorting through all their private discussions. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)19:10 No.2432714 >>2432587 Nothing if I'm in public place and there is no expectation of privacy. >> [_] Sage01 06/27/14(Fri)19:11 No.2432716 People who complain about their privacy in public spaces in acountry that disrespects their privacy outside of and in public spaces always make me laugh. Fucking tools man. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)19:30 No.2432734 let me guess two kinds of people in this thread those who have a good time while enjoying the political message camera guy puts out and those redditor government cocksuckers who say WELL ITS DIFFERENT WHEN THE GOVERNMENT DOES IT THIS GUY IS AN ASSHOLE I HOPE HE DIES! >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)19:38 No.2432744 >>2432734 Just Eurotards vs. Amerifats. Stereotypes everywhere, etc. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)19:41 No.2432746 >>2432667 Yeah, much love to him >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)19:44 No.2432748 >>2432667 That guy seemed baked off his ass. Seemed like a decent fellow though. also >zzz- >(glances at camera) >hullo... >hi... >zzzzz >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)19:51 No.2432754 Imagine instead, a man walked up to you, stood within your comfort zone, and just stared at you. I don't think it's the camera. I think we are naturally offput by perverts. And when they have a camera, it leaves little to our faith that he's just doing it accidentally. Personally, if someone was watching me, camera or no, I'd get aggressive. Just like if random strangers butted into my conversations. Or someone came really close to me and started flashing mouthfuls of chewed up food in their mouth at me. None of it's illegal, and it's not harming me at all. But the powerlessness of being unable to legally put a stop to it is enough to make me rage. It only takes one socially retarded asshole to send someone into a fury. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)19:56 No.2432760 I would of just acted cool and then grab and smash his camera. Who the fuck does this unless you a troll anyway. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)19:59 No.2432766 >>2432734 >>2432744 I'm a Shitpostralian that considered pretending to be both European and American to egg both sides on but I guess I don't really need to. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)20:01 No.2432770 >>2432760 >would of Nobody cares about your opinion, gradeschooler. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)20:04 No.2432773 >>2432754 This man has pointed it out. These people are afraid of not being able to stop him. He isn't doing anything wrong, nor illegal, but they simply don't like it so they get angry and make noise like babies because there is nothing they can do to stop him. Some threaten to call the cops because they think the police will do something, but he leaves by the time they arrive, so ultimately there is no accountability held upon him. While I would go about this in a different manner, maybe informing people of what is happening, Surveillance Man is just a man holding a camera and pointing out the paranoia that a lot of people have these days >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)20:07 No.2432778 >>2432770 grammar nazi HAHAHAHAHAHA >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)20:10 No.2432782 >>2432778 Thank you for proving my point. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)20:11 No.2432785 This man is my hero! He's just started a movement. i had no idea you could have this level of fun with a complete lack of any structured plans >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)20:14 No.2432791 I have a problem when government does this AND when random people do this. Maybe even more so random people. I have social anxiety and slight paranoia so if someone came up to me to film me, I'd be really irked and would probably lash out and or cry after asking nicely for them to stop. It's almost the equivalency of a sibling putting their finger reallll close to you and repeatedly saying "I'm not touching you." Only with a stranger. And then somehow claiming it's some political message. >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)20:15 No.2432795 >>2432681 >stepping into people's business establishments That's not protected space. You can record on private property all you want. Someone in a position of authority can tell you to leave (after which you'd be trespassing if you refuse) but they're not legally able to take your camera or ask you to delete pictures/video. >>2432657 >an unambiguous and well-known motive Treating me like a criminal before I've even stepped foot in the store? >> [_] Anonymous 06/27/14(Fri)20:17 No.2432796 >>2432795 >Treating me like a criminal before I've even stepped foot in the store? I addressed that, faggot. If the employee behind the counter held a camera right in your fucking face--you, personally, and nobody else--you would get mad too. The cameras in a store don't target any one person individually, they are just surveillance of the premises. |
|