STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR | Archived flashes: 229595 |
/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/ | P0001 · P2595 · P5190 |
This is resource WYPVMET, an Archived Thread.
Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/2456127 Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 10. Discovered flash files: 1 File: LUVORATORRRRRY!.swf-(9.46 MB, 320x180, Japanese) [_] because video Anonymous 07/18/14(Fri)15:14 No.2456127 kock out kock down Marked for deletion (old). >> [_] Anonymous 07/18/14(Fri)16:27 No.2456185 I really like this song but the versions with actual people singing it makes me remember how much I hate japanese singers, this song just sounds better with vocaloid voices somehow. I guess I just hate emotion. >> [_] Anonymous 07/18/14(Fri)17:20 No.2456231 >>2456185 >thinking these are vocaloid voices >> [_] Anonymous 07/18/14(Fri)17:51 No.2456261 >>2456185 This is the "actual people" singing version. The vocaloid version sounds nothing like this flash. Here, I found it for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oG2I17Zm8kI It's garbage, right? >> [_] Anonymous 07/18/14(Fri)17:53 No.2456265 >>2456231 Wait fuck your post threw me off, but now that I go back and read this guy >>2456185 it occurs to me that he's actually just saying he likes the vocaloid version of this song, which this flash is not, and that furthermore he dislikes the version in this flash because he "hates emotion." Well, I still disagree, but that guy didn't misunderstand the situation here as grossly as I had thought. >> [_] Anonymous 07/18/14(Fri)17:55 No.2456269 >>2456261 wow lewd >> [_] Anonymous 07/18/14(Fri)17:56 No.2456272 >>2456265 he thinks this is the vocaloid version >I really like this song but the versions with actual people singing >but the versions >> [_] Anonymous 07/18/14(Fri)17:59 No.2456277 >>2456272 There are several "cover versions," including the version in this flash. He's saying this version, and all the rest of them, are inferior compared to the original vocaloid version of which he has prior knowledge. >> [_] Anonymous 07/18/14(Fri)18:01 No.2456282 >>2456277 ok, just wondering is >>2456261 the original? >> [_] Anonymous 07/18/14(Fri)18:03 No.2456285 >>2456282 I THINK so. Someone else might be able to shed more light on the subject, but yes, my understanding is that that version is the original. |
|