STORY   LOOP   FURRY   PORN   GAMES
• C •   SERVICES [?] [R] RND   POPULAR
Archived flashes:
229672
/disc/ · /res/     /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/P0001 · P2596 · P5191

<div style="position:absolute;top:-99px;left:-99px;"><img src="http://swfchan.com:57475/39861708?noj=FRM39861708-3DN" width="1" height="1"></div>

This is resource Z5ZEZJ4, an Archived Thread.
Discovered:1/12 -2014 09:33:03

Ended:1/12 -2014 16:21:04

Checked:1/12 -2014 16:30:35

Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/2616697
Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 29.
Discovered flash files: 1


gl.swf
FIRST SIGHT [W] [I] | WIKI



File: gl.swf-(5.77 MB, 640x360, Other)
[_] Shouldn't /webm/ replace it? Why do we need /f/? 12/01/14(Mon)03:27 No.2616697

  Most flashes here tend to be straight video converted to swf. So what's the point?

Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)03:30 No.2616700

  theres a /webm/???

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)03:32 No.2616701

  >>2616697
  >most
  No. You just ignore the ones that aren't because you're a filthy normie.

>> [_] Why do we need /f/? 12/01/14(Mon)03:45 No.2616715

  >>2616701
  18 of the links on /f/ were straight video conversions. A few more were loops but only a few were
  games, etc. The vast majority could just be webms and would look better

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)03:48 No.2616719

  >>2616715
  If you've got such a problem with your youtube rips looking like shit, post them on youtube. We
  don't want them here.

>> [_] Why do we need /f/? 12/01/14(Mon)03:49 No.2616722

  >>2616719
  OP was just a random video which wasn't too big.

  The majority of /f/ would be improved by allowing webms with sound or just changing it to /webm/
  completely

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)03:53 No.2616728

  >>2616722
  No, it wouldn't. If people misuse a board it wouldn't be an improvement to let them misuse it
  more. And I only counted 13 video rips, some of the things you must think are rips were created
  as .swf's first.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)03:54 No.2616729

  >>2616728
  I think implementing webms into /f/ would be a good thing, it would be the only board with webms
  that have sound, it might spark some OC from new lurkers

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)03:55 No.2616733

  >>2616729
  We want their "OC" from youtube about as much as /sci/ wants furry porn.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)04:00 No.2616740

  Someone explain to me the joke behind this swf

  George lucas just stuffs too much shit in each shot?

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)04:19 No.2616754

  Are there any tools for making actual flash content on linux?
  So far all I've been able to do is convert videos into h.263 flvs with ffmpeg. (one of them even
  got reposted a fair bit)

  gnash plays back random things I mux together, like a .gif and a few minutes of audio but it's
  just garbage in adobe flash.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)04:26 No.2616758

  >>2616740
  Couldn't figure it out myself. They added more things to scenes to try to improve on the trailer
  I guess but the edits aren't good.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)04:27 No.2616759

  > wasn't https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRSQqR2Xy4I&l
  ist=UUXoIFuHdVHm-Zp9umA2seRQ

  faggot.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)04:31 No.2616761

  Someone knows how to load H.264 video into swfs without converting it.
  It has something to do with embedding the video into the file, waiting for the entire file to be
  loaded, and then embed the h.264 video as an external resource.
  That guy that programmed hues of megumi probably knows it.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)04:39 No.2616768

  The reason so many rips are being posted is because flash is a dying medium. Most of the people
  that still use it just post directly to youtube anyway.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)04:40 No.2616769

  >>2616761
  you'd need a flash based h.264 player.

  Otherwise, become an encoding god and use one of flash's native formats.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)05:07 No.2616779

  No. He literally packaged an H.264 video stream into a SWF and posted it here. He also encoded
  entire movies so that they fit into the 10MB filesize limit and posted them here.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)07:09 No.2616836

  No, what would be a better idea is to pressure Adobe in to adding WebM support already.
  It was supposed to be 2012 it was added. Lazy fuckers.

  Either that or go pressure moot in to adding a video board. Good luck with that, moot is a whiny
  faggot that thinks it will be used to share copyrighted stuff in large numbers. OH, PROBABLY,
  LIKE 50% OF THE REST OF THE SITE.
  Nobody would give a fuck about watching a film in 120 second increments. Not even youtube-tier
  people are that bad.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)08:24 No.2616860

  >>2616836
  >Nobody would give a fuck about watching a film in 120 second increments
  you deeply underestimate people who visit 4chan

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)08:25 No.2616861

  >>2616697
  fuck off

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)08:35 No.2616867

  >>2616697

  It would be great if the adobe added webm support to flash.

  Not going to happen tho.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)08:43 No.2616872

  Wait. That dudes voice in first 3 seconds. Is it the same voice of dark elf in Morrowind?

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)08:49 No.2616874

  >>2616860
  Exactly, people that visit here.

  Companies like the RIAA and shit like that won't give a fuck about us, we don't attract the
  numbers of people like Youtube does, and you can share far larger videos there.
  Moot is just being overly cautious.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)08:58 No.2616880

  >>2616836
  >4chan has a fucking torrent board
  >4chan used to have a fucking DDL link crawler
  You've got to be shitting me.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)09:12 No.2616886

  >>2616769

  Every time you re-encode a lossy video format, it loses a lot more than just bitrate. Artifacts
  start to pop up, audio starts to flange... better to keep it in the format that's closest to the
  original record, even if you have to make a flash-based H.264 player.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)09:40 No.2616891

  just go to krauts /int/ for webm threads like everyone else who didn't missed the train.

>> [_] BismuthVectoring !FRESHtYylA 12/01/14(Mon)10:00 No.2616899

  >>2616697
  Interactive flashes and remixing.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)10:02 No.2616901

  >>2616728
  >>2616733
  Nearly all the OC we had this year has been remixed youtube rips.

  Op does have a point. Clearly we wuld benefit from webms.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/01/14(Mon)10:20 No.2616916

  >>2616722
  >changing /f/ to /webm/
  >not /gif/ to /webm/
  fuck off, flash is for flashes, not webms, you want those you go to /b/ or fucking gif, which is
  pretty much filled with webms now. if you don't come here often enough to see the many flashes we
  have that aren't youtube rips then it's our problem.

  >>2616729
  if they are new and lurkers they probably don't have any OC to contribute and even if they do it
  would probably be more of those experimental shit flashes we see every once in a while. or more
  furry shit.



http://swfchan.net/25/Z5ZEZJ4.shtml
Created: 1/12 -2014 09:33:03 Last modified: 25/4 -2017 05:24:03 Server time: 03/01 -2025 06:09:27