File: aiming_30fps.swf-(2 KB, Game)
[_] for /v/ Anon 1943610 Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anon 1943613 And what is the point of this exactly?
>> [_] Anon 1943615 >># to show what it looks like when a game renders at 30 fps instead of 60 /v/ is arguing over 30/60 fps again, so I uploaded this and >>>/f/1943612
>> [_] Anon 1943623 >># Yeah I saw that thread and realized as much when I reloaded /f/ and saw the 60 fps version.
>> [_] Anon 1943624 >proving once again that 30fps is a notable downgrade from 60 Suck on our collective dicks casual scum
>> [_] Anon 1943625 I never understood that "theory" that the human eye can only visualize 30fps, but I can easily distinguish 30fps from 60fps any anonteacher here?
>> [_] Anon 1943628 no idea what this is about, as I'm not autistic enough to go to /v/, but anything less than 45fps is godawful.
>> [_] Anon 1943630 >># 30fps is correct only for a dark theatre and your head staying relatively still with respect to the screen (I don't know why that is)
>> [_] Anon 1943633 >># Actually it's because of old hardware in the movies that used to only output about 30FPS (actually like 24.5 FPS) and became the standard. Everyone got used to it. Now there's cameras that do 60FPS. Ever wonder why some movies look slightly odd when action happens? It's because they're using a 60FPS camera.
>> [_] Anon 1943636 >># i thought it was because things are moving too fast for 30fps to capture it with more than a few frames and your brain farts when trying to fill in the gaps
>> [_] Anon 1943640 >># What fps does the brain go at I wonder
>> [_] Anon 1943641 >># >30fps is correct only for a dark theatre [citation needed]
>> [_] Anon 1943642 >># The brain does not go at frames per second. It processes what it wants at the speeds it wants. The eyes are constant windows to the real world, and the brain renders as many frames as it can and thinks you need.
>> [_] Anon 1943643 >># so max throttle then
>> [_] Anon 1943645 >># >mfw people think we see in fps >mfw I hear people ask what resolution humans see at >mfw trying to compare human sight to vidya specs >mfw i have no face
>> [_] Anon 1943647 >># What's your brain's processing speed?
>> [_] Anon 1943648 >># How much RAM does your brain have?
>> [_] Anon 1943649 >># The theory is bullshit and based off of the effects of traditional film. For what conventional filming was at the time, you could not detect much of a difference above 24 frames per second, but below that it didn't work. Film also has a blur effect about it in the process of recording. Video games have artificial blur settings. And if you were to spin really fast in a first person shooter you would notice the difference between 60 frames and 90 frames per second, and if you experienced something like extremely fast warp travel in a dense and detailed world you would notice the difference between 90 and 120 frames per second.
>> [_] Anon 1943650 >># Beat ya to the punch, 2 minutes too slow, upgrade your graphics nerve
>> [_] Anon 1943651 1.21 gigawatts
>> [_] Anon 1943653 >># 7m cones + 125m rods = a human eye resolution equivalent of 11489x11489
>> [_] Anon 1943655 >># Hah, no. The human vision does not work in pixels or frames per second. It works in degrees and information.
>> [_] Anon 1943656 >># Very nearly 132 megapixels, nice
>> [_] Anon 1943739 is it a bad thing that 30fps looks better than 60fps to me
>> [_] Anon 1943741 >># a perfect example of the faggots im talking about. People dont see pixels. They see light reflecting off of surfaces. Try and compare apples to EM waves all you want, youre just making yourself look like an idiot >Hurr, I wonder what level of anti-aliasing humans can see?
>> [_] Anon 1943747 60 fps is smoother than 30. I noticed it. I am disgusted with 30FPS. it looks disgusting. I hate 30 fps.
>> [_] Anon 1943759 >># Yes, kill yourself.
>> [_] Anon 1943766 >># >is it bad I think a choppy display is less choppy than a less choppier display? yes.