File: MissMeYet.swf-(642 KB, 410x350, Loop)
[_] Anonymous 02/15/15(Sun)03:03 No.2689475
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 02/15/15(Sun)03:24 No.2689484
No, I'd still rather have a nigger and then a dyke as Presidents of the United States than a
Republican
>> [_] sage 02/15/15(Sun)04:04 No.2689510
>>2689484
cuck detected, pls go back to sweden
>> [_] Anonymous 02/15/15(Sun)04:06 No.2689512
>>2689484
I don't give a fuck who we've got a president, they'll all equally be ineffectual at making any
sort of impact. Welcome to lobbying, where big business cucks every president harder then Moot
ever could hope to be.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/15/15(Sun)04:08 No.2689514
I want /pol/ to leave.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/15/15(Sun)04:08 No.2689515
>>2689514
Never
>> [_] Anonymous 02/15/15(Sun)04:29 No.2689525
I also miss economic ruin, trillions 'missing' from government funds and endless wars.
Also a president who let 9/11 happen
>> [_] sage 02/15/15(Sun)04:37 No.2689529
>>2689525
Which one was that then? (other than the 9/11)
>> [_] Anonymous 02/15/15(Sun)11:56 No.2689570
>>2689514
>prefers to ignore real life
>> [_] Anonymous 02/15/15(Sun)11:57 No.2689572
obama sucks and his middle name is hussein
>> [_] Anonymous 02/15/15(Sun)12:00 No.2689574
>>2689529
Most republican presidents since regan if not all.
IIRC Regan wanted the goverment smaller so he decided to cut their allowance so to speak and
instead everyone started borrowing to fund programs.
This kind of just continued I know the "jobs" act while framed to the public as an bill to create
jobs was actually/mostly another tax cut, something that wouldn't of gotten by at the time And
while it did get a few tax cuts added in to those who actually needed it while it was being
revised those were actually really negligible and had little impact to those who needed it.
The last time the US had an actual surplus was under Clinton and while he included the social
security surplus ,which BTW is illegal, it was only two billion or so and a little under seven
the year after.
1/2
>> [_] Anonymous 02/15/15(Sun)12:01 No.2689576
Every president since the 80's planned social security tax increase/planned surplus has included
social security in the national budget. and interestingly enough the democrats tried to destroy
this bill because they expected this to happen and the money not to be there when they needed it
because it would be spent, which is what happened. And the Republicans actually got it through
interestingly enough.
Enjoy not receiving you SS when your old enough to receive it.
Another interesting tidbit is Reagan's tax cut was based on a economic simulation that they
fudged the numbers on to make it work and they got real mad and said Clinton fudged the numbers
when he was trying to pass a tax increase when no such thing happened.
TL;DR Reaganomics doesn't work like sage doesn't in /f/, The federal government is stealing your
social security, I'm loving my tax returns.
Different anon BTW. Captcha LOADO
>> [_] Anonymous 02/15/15(Sun)12:02 No.2689577
>>2689570
Wow, that sums up /pol/ nicley
