/ > /show/ > Thread 6588
Age: 24.86d Health: 62% Posters: 4 Posts: 9 Replies: 6 Files: 1+3
>> Anonymous 28jan2015(we)15:13 No.17488 OP P1
Not sure if /show/ or /fap/...
So anyway, the maker of this obviously made it in flash. Yet he is completely retarded and release
it as a movie file instead of a swf file. People are idiots right? Anyway, thought it was decent
enough to bother embedding it in a flash to be uploaded here.
Imagine if this was released as a swf instead. Would be 400 kb and have flawless, infinitely
scaling vector graphics. No video can compete with that. Such a pity the mindset of artists today.
[IMG] Heroes of Dota 001.swf (9.96 MiB)
1024x576, Uncompressed. 2359 frames, 18 fps (02:11).
Ver10, AS3. Network access: No. Text: Yes.
Bitmaps: No. Audio: Yes. Video: Yes. <METADATA>
[find in archive]
>> Anonymous 28jan2015(we)21:28 No.17492 A P2R1
>>17488
>Not sure if /show/ or /fap/...
Anything even remotely sexual is /fap/, including this.
>> Anonymous 28jan2015(we)23:07 No.17493 OP P3R2
>>17492
actually they should only be in /fap/ if it was _intended_ fap material. this is too short to be
used to fap to so i put it in /show/. most of this is just some story, dont think the maker
actually expect anyone to fap to it. even if it can give boners sure, but anything can do that
>> Anonymous 29jan2015(th)00:54 No.17494 A P4R3
>>17493
The reason for that is not if it's actually intended for fapping or not.
It's about 'safe for work' and 'not safe for work'.
>> Anonymous 29jan2015(th)01:22 No.17495 B P5
/fap/
7-1. If something wasn't intended for being jerked off to it shouldn't be here. A sexy commercial
for example shouldn't be here.
7-2. Just because something has nudity doesn't mean it should be on /fap/. Even if someone (you?)
might find it fappable it does only belong on /fap/ if most people would think it is.
7-3. If it is clear that the thing was intended fapping material it should be here even if you
don't think that most people would be able to fap to it. Don't discriminate against shitty porn.
7-4. If you are posting a porn game it should be marked as such by putting [G] at the beginning of
the title or text body. Non-games may not start the post with [G].
>> !///SWFAnts #ADMIN# 29jan2015(th)01:36 No.17496 SWF P6R4
Actually swfchan as a whole should be considered NSFW. /fap/ is indeed meant only for material
created for the purpose of fapping, not for everything considered slightly arousing or stuff that
has nudity in it. At the top of /fap/ it says "All flashes that are intended fapping material goes
here." and in the rules (if anybody actually reads them) I put the following:
+ For /fap/:
7-1. If something wasn't intended for being jerked off to it shouldn't be here. A sexy commercial
for example shouldn't be here.
7-2. Just because something has nudity doesn't mean it should be on /fap/. Even if someone (you?)
might find it fappable it does only belong on /fap/ if most people would think it is.
+ For /show/:
6-1. No pornography. Sexy stuff is OK. Stuff that technically are porn may be counted as non-porn
if it wasn't created to be fapped to (ergo 99% of all people wouldn't fap to it).
So as for Heroes of Dota 001.swf it's fine if it's in /show/. I don't think it was created as fap
material, it has more storytelling than porn in it. Think of it like this, if a 90 min movie has a
3 min sex scene in it it doesn't mean that the movie was created to be fapped to. But if someone
cuts out that sex scene and only shows that then it's pretty safe to say that that clip was created
to be fapped to. Sure, the full movie will get an adult rating for that brief scene on IMDb but I'd
like to think that here on swfchan there are no strict ratings like that.
>> !///SWFAnts #ADMIN# 29jan2015(th)01:38 No.17497 SWF P7
>>17495
...Guess I just took 14 minutes to formulate my post. Hah!
>> Anonymous 29jan2015(th)07:41 No.17502 A P8R5
>>17496
>Actually swfchan as a whole should be considered NSFW.
Oh, ok. Never mind then. My bad.
>> Anonymous 30jan2015(fr)16:17 No.17515 D P9R6
Suddenly porn
