File: We Don't Allow Right Wing Bloggers.swf-(9.75 MB, 480x272, Other)
[_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)16:54 No.2666014
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:08 No.2666028
This just shows you that communists, socialists, and the rest of their ilk are hypocritical
bigots themselves.
I can't even believe that the guy who knocked into his camera had the audacity to claim he was
nonviolent. Yeah fucking right. These people make me sick.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:11 No.2666031
>guaranteed_replies.swf
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:13 No.2666033
>>2666031
op here, that was the idea
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:14 No.2666035
There's a difference between sitting there listening and sitting there filming just because he
wants to be an asshole.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:19 No.2666038
>>2666035
Whats wrong with that? If you dont have nothing to hide you shouldnt be afraid to have a person
to film your OPEN meeting.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:20 No.2666040
>>2666035
>defending an over reaction
literally, in order to live in society, you have to recognize and gauge the extent of your
actions. Their reaction was stupidly uncalled for in comparison to his actions. With that being
said, they are willingly participating at this meet, and are afraid of having a discussion in
front of a camera. What the fuck does that say? Even ISIS has no shame
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:20 No.2666041
oh, the tragedy!
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:21 No.2666042
>>2666035
Well yes, but what right do you have to say "You're only filming us to be an asshole!" with
nothing supporting your accusation? Doesn't matter how right you are if you're just being an
overly defensive nerd about it.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:22 No.2666043
>>2666035
Maybe he's filming to upload to his blog. The video will provide a more accurate and concise
recount than if he summarized afterwards.
Besides, he wouldn't have been treated better even if he didn't bring the camera. He was being
harassed because someone recognized him as a right-wing blogger.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:25 No.2666045
>>2666014
>californians
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:25 No.2666046
Wow... that guy sure intimidated the crap out of em just by pointing a camera at them.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:26 No.2666048
>>2666035
I noticed a lot of them were trying to block the video portion of the video camera. What they
didn't realize was that the sound was much more valuable.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:27 No.2666052
I support you for posting this. They clearly do not tolerate opposing views. That's what being a
communist is all about.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:27 No.2666053
The most enjoyable part of this video is that they proved his point. He was going to video tape
them saying hypocritical things and instead video taped them acting hypocritically.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:28 No.2666054
It's like tumblr in real life.
Every "socialist" i have ever met is a self important leech in gender/ethnic studies or something
equally useless.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:29 No.2666056
How was he not "disrupting the meeting", everyone left because of him.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:30 No.2666057
ayy lmao
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:31 No.2666058
>>2666045
>Portland
It's like tumblr in real life.
Every "socialist" i have ever met is a self important leech in gender/ethnic studies or something
equally useless.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:33 No.2666061
>>2666035
It was an public meeting and he wasn't being disruptive. Whether or not he meant to be an
"asshole" (he wasn't; he was filming the meeting to later dissect it on his blog) by filming is
irrelevant.
They were trying to make him leave because he was a right-winger and dissent isn't allowed in the
echo chamber, not even when it's silent. Thought policing is endemic to the political left.
Always has been.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:34 No.2666062
>>2666056
Yeah they all left, because someone of an opposing viewpoint was video taping them. It's not his
fault their pussies, and he wasn't saying jack shit. If there so confident in there beliefs they
would of stayed and be glad that they could offer their viewpoint to a wider audience.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:36 No.2666064
>>2666056
"Someone who doesn't think the way I do is in an open meeting in a public place. Let's call the
police to remove them."
Someone being in an area doesn't constitute disruption. If anyone was disrupting the meeting, it
was all the members throwing a shit fit.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:36 No.2666065
>>2666062
shit
*there, *they're :(
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:37 No.2666068
>>2666054
>in gender/ethnic studies or something equally useless.
Not me, I just want to build a socialist world republic and put all the enemies of the state into
gulags :(
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:37 No.2666069
It certainly looks like they were all fuckwits that wanted to prevent him from filming what they
were doing. I gotta wonder though, what if he cut a part out where he was being a disruptive
asshole. He most certainly was going to cut the footage to make his point look correct.
The only defense against him would be to also film everything and post it all to allow people to
see the unedited footage.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:40 No.2666071
>>2666056
They chose to call the police for no actual reason and got themselves kicked out , he would be
disrupting if he yelled "PENIS COCK PENIS PENIS" every time they spoke.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:47 No.2666084
>>2666069
"We don't allow known right wing bloggers to tape our events..."
It's right there, Anon. C'mon, now. You're reaching.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:54 No.2666092
>>2666069
I checked google and the dude posted the 25 minute video claiming to be the unedited footage on
youtube. If there's something there to find, it can be found. I suspect it's probably going to be
the 25 most boring minutes of your life though. ;)
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)17:58 No.2666095
The problem is with the law, really. If someone don't want you to film their thing (meeting or
whatever) he shouldn't be allowed to. Kind of like how it's not allowed to film in movie theatres.
The guy with the camera was being a dick, I don't even care about what that meeting was about.
Doesn't change the fact that he was a dick.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)18:03 No.2666100
>>2666095
It was a public meeting, dumbass. No, it's nothing like filming in a movie theater.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)18:03 No.2666101
>>2666095
ur dum.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)18:06 No.2666105
>>2666092
not that guy >>2666069
but i find it highly unlikely that people would react like that with the dude just sitting and
filming there quietly
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)18:09 No.2666108
>>2666105
Then watch the video. Nobody gives a shit about what you choose to believe when there is hard
evidence which contradicts you.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)18:14 No.2666112
>>2666028
its not the fact that there comunist or socialist, its the fact that there fucking americans,
always sooo dramatic, poisoned by there media. in a perfect world we would all be a comunist
nation with perfect comunism, for example, star trek earth is comunist
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)18:18 No.2666115
>>2666112
Star Trek is a post-scarcity society, so that doesn't apply to anything in the real world. Like
communism itself.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)18:29 No.2666120
>>2666108
well i usually don't do this but i have to call you a retard on this one. The "unedited" footage
starts with him walking into the building and then cuts to the leader guy standing outside
discussing what to do about the filmer. if you call this hard evidence then all hope is lost for
you
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)18:39 No.2666128
Two words for this guy: Spy camera
He would have been much more successful in his mission if he used one of those instead of waving
an obvious camera in front of everyone.
I have one and so should everyone else.
P.S Communism is kingship all over again to "great leader"... fuck that shit!
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)18:46 No.2666133
>>2666120
>"i don't usually do this..."
I don't care, you fucking pantywaist. Commit to the insult or don't bother with it.
Their only complaint throughout the video is that he is there filming. They say that they find
the presence of a known right wing blogger threatening, that it makes them uncomfortable,
speculate that he will edit the footage of their meeting to suit his political agenda. In other
words, they were complaining that his very presence was disruptive.
Don't you suppose they'd complain of other "disruptive" behavior if he was guilty of it, that
they'd show the responding officer THEIR videos?
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)19:18 No.2666159
Left wing here, I hate these types of people. If they think this is going to make their cause
further any, then they're fuckign retards. Why not just let the guy post on his blog and whoever
wants to read it can read it. By acknowledging the person you are actually giving him
credibility, ignore them and their power is completely lost.
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)19:19 No.2666160
>>2666133
>Commit to the insult
I did call you a retard didn't I?
you have a point with this whole aftermarth but we simply don't know what happened during the
period cut from the footage and what is there is just not enough to form a decent opinion. Not
that I'm defending the childish behavior of these communists or whatever they are,
you tough guy
>> [_] Anonymous 01/22/15(Thu)19:21 No.2666163
>>2666014
>Marked for deletion (old).
;_;
