File: POLICE BEHIND ME.swf-(4.13 MB, 416x240, Other)
[_] Can you prove that I'm driving? Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)21:11 No.2745479
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)21:32 No.2745501
>>2745479
i dont believe that that man was driving at all. such police brutality. i hope hes okay. that cop
was a douche.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)21:50 No.2745519
>>2745501
in the original video the guy was acting like a complete dumbass trying to sound ethical.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b8d_1413049025
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)21:59 No.2745523
>>2745519
What a fucking nigger.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:06 No.2745528
>>2745519
>officer starting to get pissed off
>rolls up window
>"unlock the door"
>rolls down window "I will not"
>rolls window back up
I lost my shit that was so fucking stupid, pulls out a book filled with what I assume to be pure
justice, reads from it as if it was a magic spellbook that would grant him impunity, and shows it
to the officer like he gives a fuck
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:15 No.2745538
is the remix on youtube?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:15 No.2745539
>>2745479
he knows his laws.. because he is 99% right. technically.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:23 No.2745545
>>2745539
>he is 99% right
He literally said that it is legal to drive on public roads without a license.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:24 No.2745546
>>2745538
Yup, I got it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySISw6vKJYU
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:26 No.2745548
>>2745539
He was going 72 in a 55
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:26 No.2745549
>>2745519
I got an erection when the cop broke the window so effortlessly.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:27 No.2745551
>>2745519
This officer is a bad ass. he just shattered that window no problem.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:31 No.2745555
>>2745545
*travel
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:34 No.2745558
>>2745555
Eh, I suppose it would be legal to "travel" without a license, with walking and all. But he was
driving, even though he claimed he wasn't.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:35 No.2745561
>>2745558
can you prove he was driving?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:35 No.2745562
>>2745561
the cop had to have seen him driving.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:41 No.2745570
>>2745562
which he did, and he still asked that.
kek.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:41 No.2745571
>>2745561
There's a reason the law is that you have to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" and not have
photographic evidence.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:47 No.2745575
>>2745571
Even being in the driver's seat with the car on is sufficient proof (and yes, that's court tested
and approved).
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:50 No.2745578
why are people actually debating about this? is this some sort of epic new meme?
of course its police brutality fucking pig cops how could they prove he was driving.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:51 No.2745580
>>2745578
Police cars have cameras on them, and the camera would have had to have seen him driving.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:51 No.2745581
>>2745578
Because they saw him driving?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:56 No.2745587
>>2745578
Because they saw him driving...in a car.
Hate to say it, but if one won't abide by the rules enforced by the government, you'll get your
ass handed to you. This guy learned the hard way and got his window shattered by the cop like he
was superhuman, and got tazzered two times. Remember, driving is a privilege, not a right.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)22:57 No.2745588
>>2745571
beyond a reasonable doubt is the intention, but there is no way of proving it, that also only
applies to the jury as to whether there is enough evidence for conviction. An officer only needs
reasonable suspicion that the person has committed or is committing a crime to arrest someone. As
disgusting as some people may see it, the jury will most likely convict on too little evidence,
especially in insignificant cases such as traffic violations.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)23:00 No.2745594
>>2745587
>>2745581
>>2745580
no all that does is prove he was TRAVELLING
retards
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)23:02 No.2745596
>>2745594
And what, his defense is going to be that the car was simply coasting on its own and he just
happened to be in it?
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)23:08 No.2745606
>I do not consent
>I do not consent
>I DO NOT CONSENT
>You don't need to consent, you're under arrest
topkek
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)23:11 No.2745611
>>2745587
He was tazed three times
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)23:13 No.2745614
>>2745587
yeah that window smashing gave me some serious terminator vibes. i was like oh shit machines are
rising up.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)23:13 No.2745615
>>2745611
Really? Wow, one has to be a huge dumbass to be tazed that much.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)23:15 No.2745617
>>2745614
Yeah totally dude. The cop was obviously pissed off haha!!
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)23:16 No.2745619
>>2745596
yes
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)23:17 No.2745620
>>2745519
>is speeding a crime
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)23:23 No.2745629
>>2745519
>"is speeding a crime?"
...level 99 moron.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)23:26 No.2745632
I think that loophole can be patched when asked by what means they are traveling, it have been
covered in court before.
Even so, he would not have been caught if he wasn't speeding, so he is just an idiot.
>> [_] Anonymous 04/10/15(Fri)23:30 No.2745640
he was probably just waiting for a mate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71DIT6hYXYo
