STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR | Archived flashes: 229595 |
/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/ | P0001 · P2595 · P5190 |
A Very Merry Christmas! |
This is resource FMVCNBN, an Archived Thread.
Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/2733135 Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 14. Discovered flash files: 1 File: Tears in Rain.swf-(2.5 MB, 320x240, Other) [_] My replicant retired today :( Anonymous 03/29/15(Sun)17:17 No.2733135 >> [_] Anynomous 03/29/15(Sun)17:19 No.2733140 source on movie? >> [_] Anonymous 03/29/15(Sun)17:23 No.2733145 >>2733140 My Little Pony: Equestria Girls >> [_] mike 03/29/15(Sun)17:28 No.2733149 >>2733140 bladerunner beautiful movie but it's a really shitty "adaption" of the book to be honest the book being "do androids dream of electric sheep" great book also the tears in rain sequence is pretty much my favorite from any movie ever >> [_] Dr. Anonymous 03/29/15(Sun)17:29 No.2733151 >>2733149 Not to mention that one line was improved, or so the legend goes. >> [_] mike 03/29/15(Sun)17:36 No.2733159 >>2733151 right it's allegedly improvised, and I see no reason to not believe that >> [_] Anonymous 03/29/15(Sun)17:45 No.2733172 >>2733149 I must disagree I liked the movie more than the book >> [_] Anonymous 03/29/15(Sun)17:48 No.2733176 >>2733149 Well, as far as I've understood they're different enough that you have to regard them as separate works. >> [_] Anonymous 03/29/15(Sun)17:49 No.2733181 >>2733135 Also, good on you OP for posting my favorite movie of all time. >> [_] Anonymous 03/29/15(Sun)18:14 No.2733194 >>2733172 I enjoyed the movie greatly, it just did a terrible job of representing the book. Like >>2733176 said, they're practically different entities, which bothers me because they kept most of the characters. I've tried getting into other cyberpunk series like neuromancer, but it was just too edgy for the sake of being edgy. >> [_] Anonymous 03/29/15(Sun)18:25 No.2733198 >>2733194 [SEL - SE]chan has a bunch of recommendations if still have an interest in the genre. >> [_] Anonymous 03/29/15(Sun)19:38 No.2733283 >>2733149 >comparing a book to a movie You do realize that no film adaption will ever completely live up to the virtually endless descriptive capabilities of text, right? Movies typically run between 90 minutes and 4 hours at the extreme, that's not even enough time to visually convey a single chapter of a well written novel. >> [_] Anonymous 03/29/15(Sun)19:42 No.2733287 >>2733283 but half of the stuff that happened in the book didn't happen in the movie and vice versa >> [_] Anynomous 03/29/15(Sun)20:03 No.2733307 >>2733145 Go ride a ponny numbshell. |
|