STORY   LOOP   FURRY   PORN   GAMES
• C •   SERVICES [?] [R] RND   POPULAR
Archived flashes:
228095
/disc/ · /res/     /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/P0001 · P2561 · P5121

<div style="position:absolute;top:-99px;left:-99px;"><img src="http://swfchan.com:57475/70016620?noj=FRM70016620-5DN" width="1" height="1"></div>

This is resource HYGAYZH, an Archived Thread.
Discovered:25/3 -2015 20:23:10

Ended:25/3 -2015 23:52:35

Checked:26/3 -2015 00:08:01

Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/2728453
Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 28.
Discovered flash files: 1





File: Think_God_Out_Of_Existence.swf-(5.96 MB, 400x172, Loop)
[_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)14:20 No.2728453

Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)14:28 No.2728459

  source?

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)14:33 No.2728463

  my fedora tips on its own

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)14:35 No.2728466

  Can't tell if it's over-done philosophy or euphoria

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)15:29 No.2728497

  "FUCK YOU, GOD."

  kek
  That came out of left field

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)15:30 No.2728498

  I liked it until
  >being mad at santa clause

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)15:32 No.2728499

  >>2728453
  This flash makes me feel Euphoric

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)15:39 No.2728502

  the wisdom of fools

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)15:46 No.2728505

  this is from Bad Boy Bubby

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)16:15 No.2728528

  >>2728466
  If it is meant to be philosophy, it certainly sucks at it. Philosophy is about making arguments
  based on premises and conclusions that follow from the premises.

  "We are don't exist. Therefore that is no god."
  The later in no way follows from the former. It fails it be an argument. It is only sophistry.

  "We don't exist. We don't live.
  We are just atoms with identity and consciousness."
  Seems like a blatant contradiction. What would define "living" if not consciousness and identity?

  Our real duty, if we have any, is to stop being assholes to people regarding beliefs that are
  unverifiable; provided they agree not to be assholes about those beliefs.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)16:18 No.2728531

  >>2728528
  I should not type without proofreading while angry about Dawkins style atheists...

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)16:23 No.2728536

  >>2728528
  nigga you went full mad

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)16:28 No.2728539

  What is discovery but to discover?
  What is creating but to create?
  What is what, except to be?

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)16:38 No.2728550

  >>2728536
  It just feels to me like being a smug atheist is the most asshole, hipster thing to be.

  It's one thing to get pissed over republican Jesus freaks and Muslim extremists. But there are
  many intelligent, reasonable people that celebrate a personal faith and are happy to keep it to
  themselves unless asked. Atheists, on the other hand, seem to have to let you know how smart they
  are for not believing in a god.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)16:40 No.2728552

  >>2728539
  Sophistry. Nothing but empty words, arranged to make you seem more intelligent.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)16:55 No.2728572

  >>2728552
  Sophistry?
  Human beings live but a pittance. 70 years compared to the grand scheme is nothing. We are not
  born to die but rather we are born to exist. Born to make our marks. We are not here to disprove
  or prove anything. Our duty is to live our story to its end.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)17:05 No.2728581

  >>2728572
  That meant nothing substantial. Are you arguing that humans have no great meaning to the universe
  as a whole? Then why are we born with a duty?

  We are born to exist? This implies a reason. What is the reason for the existence; for the birth?
  Or do you actually mean, "We exist, therefore we exist?" Because that is also an empty statement.

  "To make a mark." "To live a story." Very poetic language. All without a clear meaning.

  The practice of making the weaker argument the better, through the use of rhetoric. Literally
  (not figuratively) the definition of sophistry.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)17:10 No.2728586

  >>2728581
  Not him, but why do you assume we are born with a duty?
  Why do you assume that existence requires a reason beyond the events that led to it?
  1 + 1 = 2. Why are there two? Because one and one were added.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)17:13 No.2728589

  >>2728581
  We exist to exist. Our purpose is to move forward. Nothing more, nothing less. It doesn't matter
  if there's a grand design for us. All we need to do is do things. The act of creation is to
  create. Do what you will with the existence you've been given, but there are definitely more
  enlightened things for you to be doing than arguing on a flash board, you pretentious nigger.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)17:16 No.2728595

  >>2728586
  I realize now I should have directed my comment at you >>2728589

  How do you define enlightenment?

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)17:20 No.2728601

  >>2728595
  Let's use a musician as an example. A musician's purpose in life may not be to create music, but
  it's what he does. It's the purpose he creates for himself. Living while knowing what you want to
  do with the life you've been given, that's what enlightenment truly is.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)17:22 No.2728602

  >>2728550
  You can thank Thunderf00t and The Amazing Athiest for creating a bunch of self important idiots

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)17:25 No.2728604

  >>2728601
  How fitting, as I happen to be a musician.
  I enjoy creating music, and as such, I create music. But is that really enlightenment? Doing
  something because it brings you pleasure? Our brains are wired to reinforce behaviors that bring
  us pleasure. Is addiction also a form of enlightenment?

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)17:28 No.2728610

  >>2728589
  You fail to argue well and result to ad hominem attacks.

  I choose to spend a modicum of leisure time enlightening the internet one moronic liberal art
  student at a time; whether they be a communications major, a gender studies major, or whatever
  you happen to be. If you find discussion on boards so beneath you, why engage? Go masturbate your
  ego elsewhere and let those that wish to debate do so.

  "The act of creation is to create." Once again, what, in a substantive explanation, does that
  mean? You throw out empty words. You speak of nihilism and enlightenment in the same breath.
  Purpose, by definition, requires reasons for action. You cannot be purposefully with out a
  purpose.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)17:38 No.2728621

  >>2728528
  >provided they agree not to be assholes about those beliefs.

  It's gonna take a long as hell wait

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)17:40 No.2728622

  >>2728610
  I can't make it any simpler for you. If you don't understand, I can't help you understand. You've
  got to experience "The moment" before I'm willing to continue this fruitless conversation into
  semantics.

  Besides that, HURRMADURR MUH LOGIMAKIL PHALLICIES

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)17:41 No.2728625

  >>2728621
  You can act on a person to person basis. You don't need to treat every Christian as a
  confrontational asshole just because some, or even most, are confrontational assholes.

>> [_] Anonymous 03/25/15(Wed)17:44 No.2728628

  >>2728622
  I now see the full extent of your true mastery over the art of language.



http://swfchan.net/27/HYGAYZH.shtml
Created: 25/3 -2015 20:23:10 Last modified: 26/3 -2015 00:11:24 Server time: 05/05 -2024 15:22:18