STORY   LOOP   FURRY   PORN   GAMES
• C •   SERVICES [?] [R] RND   POPULAR
Archived flashes:
231346
/disc/ · /res/     /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/P0001 · P2623 · P5245

<div style="position:absolute;top:-99px;left:-99px;"><img src="https://tools.swfchan.com/stathit.asp?noj=FRM75585331-6DN&rnd=75585331" width="1" height="1"></div>

This is resource PRI3W6M, an Archived Thread.
Discovered:5/6 -2015 19:28:38

Ended:5/6 -2015 22:55:56

Checked:5/6 -2015 23:16:53

Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/2802557
Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 18.
Discovered flash files: 1





File: this is what pol actually believes.swf-(3.97 MB, 320x240, Other)
[_] Anonymous 06/05/15(Fri)12:25 No.2802557

Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/15(Fri)12:32 No.2802565

  I don't see how you could deny that this show has elements of cuckold fetishism in it. This is
  the new Dan "Get In The Van" Schneider.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/15(Fri)12:36 No.2802567

  >>2802565
  It won't matter anyway, since the way TV bundling is going a la carte, most of the channels that
  host these shows will be ditched and forgotten.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/15(Fri)12:37 No.2802568

  /pol/ IS ALWAYS RIGHT

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/15(Fri)13:14 No.2802598

  >>2802557
  Prep the Bull.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/15(Fri)13:17 No.2802602

  >>2802557
  >this is what pol actually believes
  yeah, so?

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/15(Fri)13:28 No.2802610

  /POL/ WAS RIGHT AGAIN

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/15(Fri)13:28 No.2802612

  >>2802567
  >most of the channels that host these shows will be ditched and forgotten.
  Yeah, but they're all owned by the networks which are already transitioning to what you describe.
  The jews are not going anywhere.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/15(Fri)13:46 No.2802623

  >>2802612
  >owned by the networks which are already transitioning to what you describe
  What does that even mean? Are you saying they'll just push the shows onto other networks and
  force us to watch it? We're talking about the market here, and the consumer decides what to watch
  now. If they don't like a specific show, they can just change the channel. If there is an entire
  time slot with nothing but crap, they can turn the TV off or watch something on Netflix. If they
  are being inundated with the crap you describe, they can drop the specific network bundle. If it
  doesn't sell, it doesn't succeed.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/15(Fri)13:48 No.2802624

  You've misspelled /tv/

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/15(Fri)14:07 No.2802638

  >>2802623
  I'm sure you've seen this pic or similar:
  http://www.teachmedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Media-Ownership-2011.png

  It's not just one channel. It's endemic in all aspects of media production in the western world.
  This includes your netflix, yahoo streaming, vimeo, etc.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/15(Fri)14:08 No.2802640

  >>2802623
  >>2802638
  http://i.stack.imgur.com/PPhcg.jpg

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/15(Fri)14:23 No.2802654

  >>2802638
  Because people have no agency or free will, and are unable to scrutinize what they see. Right.

  >>2802640
  How old is that graphic? Right off the bat I noticed erroneous data. Jeff Bezos owns Washington
  Post now through Nash Holdings LLC. If you're going to post an infographic, at least ensure that
  it's up to date and cites its sources.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/15(Fri)14:25 No.2802659

  >>2802557

  welp. They're not wrong.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/15(Fri)14:36 No.2802664

  >>2802654
  People are idiots who do what msnbc, fox news, and the NY times tell them to do. You are damn
  right people are unable to scrutinize the information they get. that's why were all about to be
  assfucked into 1984 with the TPP.

  >how old is this
  Proof you can't scrutinize what you see, says 2013 at the top.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/15(Fri)14:40 No.2802666

  >>2802664
  My point is that Bezos bought the Post in 2013. And they happened to release that graphic despite
  there being talks of him buying it for months. WHOOPS!

  So I guess you are right about that scrutiny thing.

>> [_] Anonymous 06/05/15(Fri)15:53 No.2802710

  As a well-educated black man, I find this kind of stuff especially offensive. I mean, the black
  characters in these shows are always borderline retarded, they're stereotypically designed, speak
  in or occasionally use ebonics, and are always separated from the other characters in the show in
  some way. They're never considered equal, or 'the same'. They're different.

  The entire concept of the the black "cuckold" basically reduces my entire race to little more
  than a hate fetish. Black men are selected for this because we're viewed as barely human... it's
  that sense of disgust that MAKES the fetish. The very nature of it demeans everybody involved.

  TL;DR:
  Fuck you all, we are not a fucking fetish.

>> [_] Douche Man 06/05/15(Fri)15:55 No.2802712

  I'm offended as I am black and Jew



http://swfchan.net/28/PRI3W6M.shtml
Created: 5/6 -2015 19:28:38 Last modified: 5/6 -2015 23:17:09 Server time: 06/12 -2025 05:27:36