File: CoC_0.9.4C_mod_1.2.4.swf-(8.54 MB, 1000x800, Game)
[_] Up to date Yan 05/17/15(Sun)23:45 No.

  For those not in the know about CoC Mod, it's CoC, with a Survivalist twist, in the most recent
  versions of CoC Mod, the CoC "Prisoner" mod as been Integrated into the game, and will be updated
  regularly.

  Also, /r/ing for the latest version Breeding Season, if someone would be so kind.

Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)01:40 No.

  Would /f/ like an episodic story animation about CoC?

>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)01:45 No.

  >>2784206
  I'm pretty sure /f/ likes anything about cock.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)01:46 No.

  >>2784206
  no

>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)02:07 No.

  You know, I used to be really into CoC, but I just can't get into it anymore. Every time I try to
  enjoy it, I just imagine these weird people writing the scenes for it. Reading someone describe
  an anal sex scene with the term "crinkled star" in it feels completely ridiculous. The characters
  in it saying "Gods" instead of "God" makes me think of how Fenoxo and his team of writer-gremlins
  actually try to establish lore and build worlds out of their dumb fetishes. Almost every fucking
  futanari character in the game has "People don't accept me for having a dick :(" as a main part
  of their characterization in an embarrassing attempt to get you to become attached to them when
  at least 50% of the "female" population has both sets of genitalia.

  It all just seems so stupid to me now.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)03:43 No.

  >>2784220
  don't forget the horse dicks

>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)03:52 No.

  >>2784220
  I've always thought it was strange that anyone would be hated for being a futanari when there
  seems to be more of them than any other gender.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)04:01 No.

  >>2784220
  For me it was the term "pucker" being overused as an alternative to saying anus or butt.

  Especially when used in close proximity to "pecker."

>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)04:30 No.

  >>2784206
  It could be good. Try it anyway and see where you go.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)04:33 No.

  >>2784280
  Puck a pick of pecker pucker picker pecker pucker pick?

>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)05:55 No.

  >>2784220
  >when at least 50% of the "female" population has both sets of genitalia
  >oil-up-nigger.jpg
  Thats why I love this game. (I just wish there wasn't so much dom futa)

>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)07:17 No.

  >>2784135
  >sfw version
  But that censors literally 80% of everything.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)07:47 No.

  >>2784220
  As someone who does ERPs on the regular, the writing is a fucking joke. It's hard for me to play
  CoC and TiTs now because their use of synonyms and pacing for sex scenes are atrocious and their
  character development is so scattershot you feel like you're looking for a beetle in a haystack.
  It's especially cringy when you're getting up cozy to a futa character and like you pointed out
  it comes to that, "People dont' accept me for having a dick" part and the player's reaction is
  usually some sort of trilby tipping response like, "Well, IIII don't care about that one bit,
  milady."

  I played this one similar game that was like this but the world wasn't sex crazy and it was SO
  much better for it. I can't remember what it was called and I'm worried it turned into
  abandonware since I can't find it ever when people are talking about sex rpgs.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)08:10 No.

  >>2784340
  >because their use of synonyms
  No kidding, it's like an unwritten rule of smut that waaaay too many people don't seem to
  understand.

  Calling a guys' penis a throbbing meat popsicle is okay - in a comedy.

  If you're writing non-comedy smut, it's out of place; hell you shouldn't even need to refer to
  the specific body parts much. The smut should be about what the characters feel and experience,
  the bodies only need a vague description (the reader's mind fills in the details automatically)
  and the physical action is more like a backdrop to it; otherwise you'll find yourself describing
  boring mechanical action.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)08:19 No.

  >>2784348
  I can see they go for wordcount for their scenes, but really, brevity can be a lot more evocative
  than several paragraphs of, "It goes in and out". You hit the nose on the head with the
  importance of focusing on what you're feeling and not the "Your two inches thick duo of balls
  sway increasingly."

  Can we take a moment to ask ourselves where the fuck the phrase "Duo of balls" came from and why
  they thought that was a good idea?

>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)08:26 No.

  you niggers are expecting good writing out of a shitty text based smut game
  >shiggy diggy

>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)08:44 No.

  >>2784357
  There's a difference between expecting something good and something passable. I'm not asking for
  professional work here. Just something that doesn't make me cringe.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)08:51 No.

  >>2784368
  if your jimmies are rustled then make your own mod for this shit like Kitteh6660 did.

>> [_] Anonymous 05/18/15(Mon)09:00 No.

  >>2784372
  I prefer ERPing. I used to play CoC before I found ERPing. I'm a lot happier with it, though it
  is hard to get good partners though. But quality is never easy.