File: Nuclear Attack.swf-(4.06 MB, 480x360, Other)
[_] Anonymous 07/09/15(Thu)14:04:21 No.2839357
What are your chances assuming you don't have a bunker or year worth of food stock
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/15(Thu)14:30:10 No.2839380
Canned Food
Jerkey
PROFIT!?
>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/15(Thu)14:33:29 No.2839388
>>2839357
>implying I would want to hide in a bunker for a year and live in a post apocalyptic world
afterwards
>implying I wouldn't go to the roof watching all that fireworks
spoiler alert: it's not like in the movies
>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/15(Thu)14:46:20 No.2839405
>>2839357
I have a question. Where/when was this recording acquired?
>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/15(Thu)14:46:52 No.2839407
There's 2 possible outcomes to this:
>the blast kills you
>you somewhat survived but got killed and looted by other people
>you somewhat survived and died of radiation poisoning (or cancer if you live long enough)
>>2839388
like this anon said, even with bunker, chances of humanity survives is pretty slim. water will
get irradiated (with everything else). you'd have to have a good bunker too (2 stories deep)
>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/15(Thu)14:53:59 No.2839417
if the range is 400 doesn't that mean anything just within reach is safe?
>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/15(Thu)15:02:59 No.2839428
>>2839357
>▶
North korea
Maximum kek
>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/15(Thu)15:06:02 No.2839431
the real question is, will we even know when it happens? we are on the fucking computer all day,
does the government have a way to override the internet to inform everyone in time? Most of us
might see a happening thread on /pol/ and just not believe it.
>n korea
>only 4 missiles
>implying the us can't shoot down hundreds of them
>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/15(Thu)15:10:50 No.2839440
>Best Korea
>4 nukes
>reaching the US
Nigger you're dumb.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/15(Thu)15:13:28 No.2839442
>>2839440
Implying they would even get off the launchpad
>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/15(Thu)15:19:46 No.2839445
>>2839442
>>2839440
>implying they made a launchpad
>implying it isn't just made of cake
>implying it wouldn't be on Great Leader's lunchpad
>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/15(Thu)15:19:50 No.2839447
>>2839388
>>2839407
During the cold war it was estimated that up to 90% of the russian population would survive a
nuclear strike
>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/15(Thu)15:30:13 No.2839454
>>2839447
where's the cold war and where are we now
also starting world war 3 wouldn't profit anyone
>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/15(Thu)15:43:24 No.2839465
>>2839388
>>2839407
Funny how you say "it's not like in the movies" and then assume that everything just goes to
total shit.
The very biggest nuke's destruction radius isn't even 30 miles. You'd have to be very unlucky to
die if only 4 of those were launched, and most are smaller than that.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/15(Thu)15:53:30 No.2839474
>>2839431
>does the government have a way to override the internet
Yes, notice the 13 root name servers to respond with another IP than requested. You want to load
a Youtube? Well, though shit because the IP we sent you doesn't correspond to Youtube's IP.
>> [_] Anonymous 07/09/15(Thu)15:53:39 No.2839475
>>2839465
This, nuclear war wouldn't end humanity, a particularly big nuclear war like with Russia might
kill most people in America, and cause some fallout issues for southern Canada and northern
Mexico, but most people would still be fine
