File[bb_tm.swf] - (2.5 MB)
[_] [?] Anonymous 08/26/09(Wed)23:36 No.1058609
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 08/26/09(Wed)23:43 No.1058610
Alarming, but I don't trust the form...
>_>
>> [_] Anonymous 08/26/09(Wed)23:47 No.1058613
hmmm I think I should put all of my pesonal info into this flash posted on 4chan, seems legit.
But seriously, yes, our country is stupid for having that many nukes.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)00:26 No.1058632
>>1058613
It is also the strongest because of them.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)00:30 No.1058633
>>1058632
Yes but do we need that many? 6 would decimate Russia. 100 would decimate most of the world.
Do we need 150,000 or more? Its just a waste of money.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)00:51 No.1058654
>>1058633
The thing is that the Hiroshima bomb was relatively weak. We have about 10,000 warheads last time
I saw any figures. The ad is designed to be misleading in that regard. Do we need all of those?
Certainly not, but we need to keep some.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)01:03 No.1058658
you know what? i was almost interested. but then i heard it was ben from ben and jerrys. ben and
jerry are out of the closet, full frontal FAGS.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)01:22 No.1058662
>>1058633
I'm not sure if his math is right. 90 Hiroshimas doesn't seem enough to blow up all of Russia.
After all wasn't the Tunguska incident 1000 times more powerful then Hiroshima? That only
effected 830 square miles. Russia is 6,592,800 sq mi, meaning that 7,943+ Tunguskas are needed to
level Russia, or nearly 8,000,000 Hiroshimas. 150,000 Hiroshima size bombs would hardly scratch
Russia.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)01:51 No.1058673
>>1058662
It would wipe out most people, land mass is not a concern
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)01:52 No.1058674
I'd rather have shitty schools than have China roll up on us.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)02:11 No.1058692
I think, that, I liked the sound the bbs made when they hit the glass. Was like rain. Very
calming. Soooooo... AMERICA NEEDS MORE NUCLEAR WEAPONS SO HE CAN POUR OUT MORE BBS TO MAKE ME
FEEL GOOD! GOGOGOGOGOGOGOGO!
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)02:26 No.1058701
WE HAVE A SHITTON OF NUKES
FUCK THE WORLD
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)02:28 No.1058702
FUCK YOU ICE CREAM MAN
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)03:48 No.1058737
diabeetus
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)04:09 No.1058738
fag
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)04:19 No.1058747
Everyone ITT is an idiot
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)04:31 No.1058751
>>1058610
alarmist more like it, they're overexaggerating and dont even mention the number of treaties we
have active that mandate reductions of our stockpiles.
i fucking dread the day that the US gets conned into a treaty by all the dirty hippies to
dismantle all of our weapons because then we'll be rolled over by china and russia within days
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)04:36 No.1058754
>>1058751
..you call someone an alarmist then say we will get 'rolled over by china and russia in days'
lol wut?
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)04:37 No.1058755
>>1058754
Like I said; everyone in this thread is an idiot
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)04:38 No.1058757
FUCK YEAH, AMERICA
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)05:15 No.1058766
>>1058755
Seconded
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)05:25 No.1058768
in soviet russia weapon explode you
>> [_] IWBTVB 08/27/09(Thu)05:49 No.1058773
TALK SOFTLY BUT CARRY A BIG STICK
DON'T ANY OF YOU FUCKING UNDERSTAND THAT?
>> [_] sage sage 08/27/09(Thu)05:51 No.1058774
It's not that we have that much more, it's just that they're that much more powerful.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)07:15 No.1058792
I say we bomb all of our enemies when they're not paying attention and get rid of the excess
nukes.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)07:25 No.1058797
usa failed, no point on fixing it now
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)07:44 No.1058802
>>1058768
...in america too
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)07:45 No.1058803
>>1058662
there's not exactly a shitload of cities in russia, most of it is siberia
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)08:42 No.1058821
Each time I come to this thread I'm drawn to write up an intelligent commentary on this thread
and the content in the flash vid. And every time I delete it and just say
Everyone in this thread is a fucking idiot.
There's no point. Nothing will change. All your opinions in this meaningless thread are all moot
and will all soon be forgotten by the lot of u.
With that said:
.....
...fuck it. Doesn't matter. Everyone ITT is an idiot anyway.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)08:49 No.1058822
You can't assume that you'll have many of your own nukes still in a usable condition in the event
that your targets your launch sites (which is a given). Some large amount of redundancy is
expected, and necessary.
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)09:03 No.1058830
and he couldn't just give he the number and his sources?
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)10:42 No.1058862
flash should be called: marbles of paranoia
>> [_] Anonymous 08/27/09(Thu)11:11 No.1058872
>>1058632
we used 2 nukes to get to where we are, we dont need over 9000
