File: The Dissolution Wagon.swf-(9.66 MB, 320x240, Other)
[_] The South will rise again! Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)04:20:48 No.2894372
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)04:47:09 No.2894378
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAfHigPsC_s
oh im a good ole rebel
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)06:09:44 No.2894407
>>2894372
>yes charge cannon fire and bayonets for the wealthy 5% of slave holding landowners
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)06:11:07 No.2894408
>>2894407
The Civil War wasn't about slavery.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)08:10:36 No.2894426
>>2894372
Federalism won, man, let it go.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)08:15:44 No.2894429
>>2894372
There's not enough Viagra produced in ten years that would allow for the south to rise again.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)08:23:26 No.2894430
>>2894408
And Desert Storm wasn't about oil
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)09:16:13 No.2894442
>>2894430
And 9/11 wasn't about melting steel beams.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)09:22:11 No.2894443
>>2894429
kek
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)11:30:29 No.2894486
>>2894442
niceme.me
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)11:50:54 No.2894499
>>2894408
It was about states rights.... to own slaves.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)12:08:40 No.2894512
>>2894408
It wasn't.
>>2894430
How old are you?
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)12:11:17 No.2894513
>>2894408
how was school today, champ?
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)12:16:22 No.2894519
>>2894430
>And Desert Storm wasn't about oil
It's funny because your sarcastic point actually speaks against you somewhat. Desert Storm was
about oil, a facet of government corruption. The American Civil war was about the north
struggling to maintain control over the south's economy, a facet of government corruption.
In the case of both Desert Storm and the Civil War, a different scapegoat was given to make
people believe it wasn't about government corruption. For the civil war, slavery was that
scapegoat.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)12:18:31 No.2894521
>>2894519
gb2/pol/ moron.
Don't let the chemtrails mind control you on the way out.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)12:20:54 No.2894523
>>2894521
You must know a lot of /pol/ if you think that is a /pol/ post
Why do you know so much about /pol/? :^)
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)12:22:48 No.2894526
>>2894519
you mean it was about controlling the south's economy by way of stopping them from enslaving
humans
so it was about slavery, you dense fruitcake
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)12:22:57 No.2894527
>>2894521
I've never been to /pol/ in my entire life, but okay.
I'm sorry you find it so hard to believe that people in positions of governmental power can be
corrupt and ill-intentioned, despite their overwhelming incentives for being that way.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)12:24:24 No.2894529
>>2894526
No you fuck. It was about collecting taxes from them, that was the point. The north didn't give a
flying fuck about slavery, and neither did Lincoln. There is actual fucking historical evidence
of this as well.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)12:47:03 No.2894541
>>2894529
the emancipation proclamation (and the rest of written history) would like a word with you.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)12:59:59 No.2894548
>>2894541
Lincoln wrote that 3 years into the civil war. In the earlier years of the war, he specifically
said, in written form, multiple times (and not taken out of context) that he doesn't care about
the enslavement of the negroes and should like to deport them all back to africa because he hates
them.
Lincoln's father was a fucking slave catcher by trade. He wasn't raised in an environment to
where he would feel compassionate towards black people.
He started waving the anti-slavery banner because he realized he would get more popular support
that way, because being anti-slavery was becoming popular opinion by that time. He was doing it
for good publicity, like any fucking politician would. This shouldn't be fucking surprising.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)13:03:44 No.2894549
>>2894548
This guy gets it.
>> [_] Anonymous 09/04/15(Fri)13:21:08 No.2894553
>>2894548
The Emancipation Proclamation also specifically freed slaves in rebelling states. It stated quite
clearly that slaves residing in states that were under the control of the Union were not to be
touched.
>>2894541
So, yeah. Fuck this guy/retard ^
