File: 1198075382271.swf-(216 KB, 320x240, Loop)
[_] Anonymous 12/07/15(Mon)17:19:03 No.2971742
Filesize is inversely proportional to quality of flash.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/15(Mon)17:20:35 No.2971743
must have music sauce
>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/15(Mon)17:35:47 No.2971755
>>2971742
This flash is shit though. It doesn't even have music sauce by resizing the window.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/15(Mon)17:37:35 No.2971759
>>2971742
I remember those days, when you had to be alerted by small file sizes because they were often
trolling (infinite tabs/prints)
>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/15(Mon)18:52:23 No.2971813
>>2971759
>those days
i.e. today?
I don't think anyone trusts a 50 byte flash
>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/15(Mon)18:54:16 No.2971816
>Filesize is inversely proportional to quality of flash
More like "swfs which reach the max filesize are almost guaranteed to be vid rips, which are
almost always shit".
A dump 'dance' gif + generic techno music isn't quality, but I'd take anyday over standard
youtube garbage.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/15(Mon)19:20:09 No.2971839
>>2971742
song?
>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/15(Mon)19:30:39 No.2971849
>>2971839
swfchan
>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/15(Mon)19:52:12 No.2971870
>>2971849
no
>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/15(Mon)19:55:23 No.2971874
>>2971870
Fuck off then
>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/15(Mon)20:32:03 No.2971901
>>2971874
no
