File: ef_loli_run_vector.swf-(1.19 MB, 1280x720, Loop)
[_] YouTube® faggots™ please leave Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)11:14:14 No.3026727
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)11:36:52 No.3026738
Hey buddy. This whining never actually achieves anything.
People who want to post video rips will continue to do so.
You whining about it only degrades/shits up the board even if your intentions are arguably
positive.
Also this flash is meh... gets old quickly.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)11:59:40 No.3026756
>>3026738
ok, you sure convinced me.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)12:03:18 No.3026761
>>3026756
Just giving you the facts.
Its like... going to McDonalds and telling people in line not to buy burgers.
They are still gonna buy the burgers and you're just annoying them and the people around them.
Not that I am telling you what to do but just some advice.
Good day sir.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)12:27:24 No.3026779
Space Dispute was more amusing than this series as a whole and than this flash.
OP is a faggot
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)12:35:15 No.3026784
She's not a loli she's just pettanko
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)12:39:40 No.3026786
>>3026779
then go watch it on youtube and stop whining about actual flashes on /f/ you faggot
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)12:44:46 No.3026788
the problem is that hardly anyone makes flash animations anymore
And the few decent animators that are still left stopped caring about file sizes long ago, so the
10MB max file size is just not sufficient nowadays.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)12:55:33 No.3026793
>>3026779
I'm sure there are many amusing things but that doesn't mean it belongs on /f/.
Just because you shoved a badly encoded H.263 video inside a .swf doesn't mean you should post it
on /f/. It means you should re-evaluate whether whatever you're doing right now is really what
you should be doing.
>>3026788
This "there isn't enough content so shitposting is okay" excuse is garbage. Imagine if people on
/3/ or /po/ went about their business like this.
Besides, you're implying that nobody on /f/ makes OC and just gets their stuff from somewhere
else, which is ironic considering you're saying this in a thread started with an /f/-made flash.
>so the 10MB max file size is just not sufficient nowadays.
Absolute BS. You're saying regular flashes are too large to post but post inefficiently encoded
videos instead, which are the epitome of shit too large to post.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)13:03:47 No.3026795
>>3026793
This video was not just thrown together.
It was made using an expensive converter and there was a considerable amount of time and effort
put in to edit it for certain parts and to get the best quality out of it.
For a non-expert to get pretty clear/decent quality out of an HD video with only 10mbs isn't
exactly bad considering the limitations of SWF and its pretty poor talent as a video streamer.
Atleast its pretty clear and so you can enjoy it.
Quit bitching.
If I would have just thrown it into a converter and not put in a considerable amount of work for
better quality you'd have a shit sandwhich but instead you get a decent video showing an
interesting burger being made and quickly tasted.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)13:05:02 No.3026796
>>3026795
>It was made using an expensive converter and there was a considerable amount of time and effort
put in to edit it for certain parts and to get the best quality out of it.
Nigga
you used H.263
instead of H.264
You are so full of shit it's not even funny.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)13:08:23 No.3026800
>>3026796
no... it used the flv codec actually.
I didn't encode the original video obviously.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)13:08:57 No.3026801
>>3026793
I would rather have something amusing than the finest pile of shit content on /f/.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)13:11:10 No.3026803
>>3026800
flv is the container
flv can contain various video codecs, the best of which is H.264. You used H.263.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)13:13:45 No.3026805
>>3026803
Is the difference between the two significant?
If so I will try hard to make sure the next time I convert that I make sure it gets used.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)13:20:07 No.3026813
>>3026805
Let me quote Wikipedia for you:
>The intent of the H.264/AVC project was to create a standard capable of providing good video
quality at substantially lower bit rates than previous standards (i.e., half or less the bit rate
of MPEG-2, H.263, or MPEG-4 Part 2), without increasing the complexity of design so much that it
would be impractical or excessively expensive to implement.
H.263 is from the 90s. It's probably older than you are.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)13:23:09 No.3026815
>>3026813
Well I appreciate the advice and I will take it to heart.
I am kind of a novice at much of this stuff but I have learned a good deal over time and I still
want to learn and understand much more about all this stuff.
I do care about the quality of stuff I post here and I do genuinely want people to enjoy it.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)13:31:35 No.3026820
>>3026738
>You whining about it only degrades/shits up the board even if your intentions are arguably
positive.
Even worse, it encourages people to post shit even more often because they're hoping to get a
reaction.
It's the one lesson /a/ never seemed to learn.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)13:52:38 No.3026843
>>3026813
I look forward to when the flash player supports H265, which is the new thing. Same quality but
with a 40-50% reduction if file size, very awesome.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)14:11:02 No.3026860
I have learned from this conversation , but what I'd like to know is where is she from?
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)14:18:38 No.3026866
>>3026727
It's just one guy, he admitted to uploading 15 in a row yesterday
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)14:21:02 No.3026868
is there still a 2 active flash limit? if so he must have nothing else to do with his life
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)14:21:47 No.3026869
>>3026843
It won't ever. Patenting is a fucking nightmare due to the two competing patent pools, and Adobe
has pretty much given up on the Flash Player platform; they've renamed their flash creation suite
to "Animate" or some shit to get rid of the association, and recommend you use the HTML5 export
to deploy stuff.
One thing I could imagine is them adding VP9 as an afterthought since it's a small fix; the only
issue being that VP9's reference encoder libvpx is pretty bad and Google's claims to it being
patent unencumbered are dubious at best, since it's very similar to H.265. The fact that Google
makes breaking changes every other year (they're now working on VP10) does not help the situation
for third-party implementors, especially with regards to hardware decoders.
TL;DR: H.264 is probably the best we'll get. But it's okay, x264 is still the best encoder, which
is why you'll barely find any anime torrents encoded with H.265/HEVC. x264 just squeezed that
much coding performance out of H.264 that it's hard to beat it with a respectable margin;
benchmarks are often done against reference encoders.
It's not looking good for Adobe Flash, crossbridge.io is the last hope we really have to keep the
platform commercially interesting enough for Adobe to spend more resources on it.
>>3026860
Right click the flash
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)14:23:02 No.3026871
>>3026801
Then go to youtube or /wsg/.
>> [_] Anonymous 02/20/16(Sat)14:28:12 No.3026880
>>3026801
if you want to watch youtube videos go to youtube faggot
