STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR | Archived flashes: 229594 |
/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/ | P0001 · P2595 · P5190 |
Visit the flash's index page for basic data and a list of seen names.
Threads (19):
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Loop) [_] Anon 3234931 Marked for deletion (old). >> [_] Anon 3235012 It can't, but it can weaken them. >> [_] Anon 3235024 >># Shut up silverstein >> [_] Anon 3235038 It can't, but it can weaken them which in large buildings can lead to collapse. Get over it, there is no 9/11 conspiracy it was a terrorist attack. >> [_] Anon 3235042 >># >># I won't be convinced until mythbusters proves it
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Loop) [_] Anon 2901499 >> [_] Anon 2901638 Jet fuel doesn't have to melt steel, it only has to weaken it to the point of failure. Once it loses cohesion, the tons of concrete it's holding up will fall. That point is well within the temperature range of jet fuel. But you're just a dumb fuck troll, so basic science is way beyond you. Oh, and I'd like fries with that. >> [_] Anon 2901639 >># It's not even a very good meme. >> [_] Anon 2901640 >># Jet fuel can't melt steel beams is a meme from the desolate wasteland called /sci/. Don't worry about it. >> [_] Anon 2901646 >># Instantaneous response! Asshole looser detected.
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Loop) [_] Love the way you move 2892246 Your daily reminder >> [_] Anon 2892323 >># Jet fuel can in fact melt steel beams. Look it up. >> [_] Anon 2892329 I never did figure out why it was such a big shock to people. Probably because I was eight at the time. >> [_] Anon 2892333 jet fuel can't melt these memes
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Other) [_] Love the way you move 2865005 Your daily reminder Marked for deletion (old). >> [_] Anon 2865023 some of them says can some says can't quality control? >> [_] Anon 2865039 How did this start anyways? I'm pretty sure this shit showed up like a year ago with that talking horse pic. >> [_] Anon 2865041 /pol/ maymay >> [_] Anon 2865067 >># it started a few months after two airplanes flew into two tall buildings in the usa during 2001 >> [_] Anon 2865069 >># >a few months >2001 kek >> [_] Anon 2865127 >># everywhere maymay it's cancer and needs to die >> [_] Anon 2865165 Steel doesn't need to become liquid to become completely useless at bearing loads. 1000K is all it takes, and jet fuel fire reaches that easily. *The more you know* >> [_] Anon 2865171 >># no anon. jet fuel can't melt steel beams. >> [_] Anon 2865172 9/11 the musical, i'd pay to see that >> [_] Anon 2865200 >># >Not understanding that most of us know this >That's the joke >Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Other) [_] Happy july 4th Anon 2833446 >> [_] Anon 2833504 >># But, it doesnt have to melt them... it just needs to weaken them so that it can no longer support the weight they were designed to... >> [_] Anon 2833543 >># Yeah, pretty much this. Im pretty sure no one but fox news claimed that the beams were melted anyway, but sufficient heating is all thats required to compromise load bearing. Add into that that the twin towers had serious architectural problems with the fireproofing that protects the load bearing beams (among other things the cables of elevators kept swaying and scraping the stuff off) - and a fire could really fuck it up. >> [_] Anon 2833547 >># what happened to the third tower? >> [_] Anon 2833565 >># spontaneous combustion
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Loop) [_] /f/ needs more memes Assisstant Dankette 2815964 Marked for deletion (old). >> [_] Anon 2815965 Jet fuel can't melt stale memes. >> [_] Anon 2815997 >># There was a man on Funnyjunk who sung this, can't remember his name. It is suprising to see that it made it out here. >> [_] Anon 2816033 actually if appropriated right, jet fuel CAN melt steel beams. i work with metal for a living. i would know. >> [_] Anon 2816069 >># Blasphemy!!!!!!! >> [_] Anon 2816096 >># Yeah, firefighter here. Regardless of whether or not Jet Fuel can melt steel beams, you don't need to melt them to severely compromise the structural integrity of a building. I don't know conspiracy theorists realize how heavy buildings are. Buildings are really heavy. >> [_] Anon 2816114 Fun fact: jet fuel being able to seriously hinder the integrity of steel beams Is the main reason the twin towers went down. All skyscrapers are designed to be able to take a hit from a plane. >> [_] Anon 2816133 >># cancer >> [_] Anon 2816170 if jet fuel could melt steal beams there would have been an explosion, pushing the building upwards thus preventing it from falling >> [_] Anon 2816177 >># >># not the point, the point is that they found melted steam beams in the wreckage :^)
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Loop) [_] Anon 2793668 >> [_] Anon 2793677 Its these "jet fuel" meemses that hurt the only those who seek the truth >> [_] Anon 2793697 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIj818Sg HQE >> [_] Anon 2793728 >># i wonder if people are aware that coal doesn't burn with high enough temperature to melt iron. the middle ages is a lie!
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Hentai) [_] Anon 2783848 >> [_] Anon 2783947 What the shit is this meme? Seriously, its so fucking stupid. >> [_] Anon 2783959 >># It is an argument by 9/11 conspiracies on the collapsing of the towers. Somehow there conspiracies became shit tier memes. As for jet fuel melting steel beams, all you need to do is heat up the steel, causing to become soft and more susceptible to corrosion. Not to mention that parts of the tower are broken by the plane.
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Loop) [_] Anon 2778290 Your daily reminder >> [_] Anon 2778310 Is that Ben Folds singing that? >> [_] Anon 2778400 How annoying. You don't need to melt them, just compromise the integrity, soften them up a bit. >> [_] Anon 2778413 >># jet fuel can't melt steel beams >> [_] Anon 2778444 >># Quite correct. And totally irrelevant to the collapse of the american bifurcated dick. >> [_] friendsofsandwiches 2778446 And as I've said before, I'm willing to agree that jet fuel by itself can't melt steel beams, if you are willing to agree that a WHOLE FLOOR ON >>FIRE<< CAN.
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Other) [_] Anon 2768694 memes >> [_] Anon 2768749 I LOVE ME MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES >> [_] Anon 2768787 dynamite used for demolition of steel infrastructure doesn't need to melt it in order to cause the structure above to collapse.
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Loop) [_] Anon 2766391 Your daily reminder >> [_] Anon 2766408 No kerosene fire can burn hot enough to melt steel." The posting is entitled "Proof Of Controlled Demolition At The WTC." FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel. >> [_] Anon 2766409 >># It doesn't have to melt them. >> [_] Anon 2766413 >># how does it feel knowing that everyone who knows anything about building construction thinks your opinion is a joke? It doesn't need to melt the beams, just weaken them, which jet fuel does burn hot enough to do. The "melted metal" in all those pictures is probably aluminum, or some other metal that melts at lower temperatures that the building was full of. >> [_] Anon 2766431 >># I could understand the top third of the building becoming weakened enough to collapse, but how does that part crush the other structurally sound two thirds flat at near free fall speed? It doesn't make sense. >> [_] Anon 2766432 >># It doesn't if the structure met regulations, the real conspiracy is that unions are pushing up prices and driving down quality >> [_] Anon 2766441 Why are americans so dumb? I don't see other country being so retarded and with so many conspiracy theories and pseudoscience. >> [_] Anon 2766451 demolition of buildings never involves melting the infrastructure. low and behold, people have been leveling buildings with explosives ever since there have been buildings. >> [_] Anon 2766454 The Twin Towers were constructed using a series of Trusses, not Steel beams. "Don't trust the Truss" as they say, because they're known to fail during just about any fire. When the trusses failed in the Towers, suddenly the entire floor it was supposed to be supporting gave way, and created a domino effect, cascading down into every subsequent floor below causing the building to collapse in the way that it did. >> [_] Anon 2766465 >># Hi COINTELPRO agent, the guys over at the NSA paying you enough to sell your soul lately? >> [_] Anon 2766468 >># >>>/x/ >>>/pol/ >> [_] Anon 2766475 >># I will go wherever the hell I want you mindless shill. Just remember when you collect your paycheck from the counter intelligence branch of the military that your a traitor to human kind.
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Other) [_] Anon 2742820 Your daily reminder Marked for deletion (old). >> [_] Anon 2742859 to what? >> [_] Anon 2743006 Your daily reminder that plastic deformation is too difficult a concept for your average conspiracyfag. ie. conspiracyfags are idiots. >> [_] Anon 2743047 *You're daily reminder. >> [_] Anon 2743058 >># *Your daily reminder. >> [_] Anon 2743065 >># Stop with this meme, people who aren't familiar with the english language might believe you if you correct them incorrectly Heck even amerifats do this mistake way too often which is really saddening >> [_] Anon 2743069 >># *Stop with this meme, people who aren't familiar with the English language might believe you if you correct them incorrectly. Heck even amerifats do this mistake way to often which is really saddening.
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Loop) [_] Anon 2740707 Your daily reminder >> [_] Anon 2740730 half the references say it can, the other half say it can't; now I'm confused by your conspiracy double-talk: pick a side and stick to it. >> [_] Anon 2740817 >># A question of scientific fact should be examined rationally. Automatically associating it with a conspiracy theory is part of the problem. >> [_] Anon 2740863 >># >># The problem is that the average american citizen is ignorant. For them the steel is either melted or rigid. Anyone with any form of education, or any european with elementary school behind them can tell you about a thing called plastic deformation. For example, it's what steel under stress does more easily when it's heated to glowing. If you have a gas- or briquette-fired bbq grill, you can test this yourself at home with any piece of steel. >> [_] friendsofsandwiches 2740892 I'd be willing to coincide that jet fuel can't melt steel beams if the people pushing this argument would coincide that a whole FUCKING FLOOR ON FIRE ... >CAN< melt fucking steel beams. >> [_] friendsofsandwiches 2740893 coincide=concede (rassin frassin auto correct) >> [_] Anon 2740896 >># this this this 1000x this nobody has heard of the process of annealing I guess
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Other) [_] Anon 2739218 >> [_] Anon 2739293 heres the story boi we crash in to the 911 towers then the jet fuel ignites some wood and bam the firey wood melts the steel beams and people will think hitlers all good casue jet fuel cant melt steel beams
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Other) [_] Anon 2737229 Marked for deletion (old). >> [_] Anon 2737246 what if i told you that through the combination of a plane crashing into it along with uber high temps of burning fuel the steel can be weakened enough to fail. >> [_] Anon 2737253 >># then I'd call you a government shill and tell you to fuck off >> [_] Anon 2737255 what if i said the jet fuel ignited some wood and wood can melt steel beams >> [_] Anon 2737259 >># I'd buy it. >> [_] Anon 2737289 is that mark from blink182? >> [_] Anon 2737445 >># Nah m8, it's a a user from fj https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMYkzMTs -u0
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Other) [_] Anon 2733758 >> [_] Anon 2733872 Probably my least favorite current dank meme.
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Other) [_] Anon 2732172 Marked for deletion (old). >> [_] Anon 2732203 nice stale meme >> [_] Anon 2732269 not in it's liquid state, but once it blows up, it will melt krypon and supermans skin right off what kinda fuckin' moron put this together >> [_] Anon 2732278 dank >> [_] Anon 2732293 >># Seems like this meme was too dank for you son. >> [_] Anon 2732295 /pol/ in a nutshell >> [_] Anon 2732300 >># Jet fuel cant melt dank memes >> [_] Anon 2732310 I love it how conspiracyfags only ever manage to underline how uneducated they are.
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Other) [_] Anon 2729579 Marked for deletion (old). >> [_] Anon 2729604 is this the /pol/ themesong? >> [_] Anon 2729648 >># Hi, I'm Dan! >> [_] Anon 2729682 >># Has anyone ever considered a that in addition to the extreme heat... That a fucking plane crashed into the tower? Maybe that had something to do with it, or a small explosion leveling it even more... You know putting a few things together like that with at least a quarter of the tower on top of it can lead to total collapse. Anyone who thinks the jet fuel theory has no clue about architecture. I think they should focus on the real problem... Like who did it. Not what. >> [_] Anon 2729684 >># It was honestly a miracle that fucker stayed up so long after the plane thrashed into it. Just because it didn't fall at first doesn't mean the interior was coming loose more and more as time went on., >> [_] Anon 2729685 >># Glad you got the joke. Thanks for sharing. Your snowflake badge has been sent. >> [_] Anon 2729687 >># *wasn't coming loose >> [_] Anon 2729703 >># I know its a joke, but I know people who seriously will fucking use that as their only defense. And I'm talking real people I know. >> [_] Anon 2729706 Funny thing is, we've all heard about what >># is saying about the jet fuel bit but what I want to know is why it got popular just recently for folk to mention it. It's kind of a late joke if you ask me but if you continue to ask me, I'd say that it being late makes it a tad bit funnier. >I want a snowflake badge, too. >> [_] Anon 2729711 >># Because it is the perfect catchphrase for the modern internet, everyone thinks they are an expert in a subject because they read a few websites about it. "Jet fuel can't melt steel beams" is just a succinct way of saying "I think I know more about engineering then every single professional engineer, building designer, and professor." >> [_] Anon 2729732 >># The argument isn't primarily based off of the idea of what made it crash, it's that molten steel was found at the site; hence, there must have been another reactant, such as thermite. >> [_] Anon 2729734 im not a conspiritard but the way the towers collapsed straight down is weird to me >> [_] Anon 2729742 >># no plane hit tower 7.
File: jet fuel can't melt steel beams.swf-(920 KB, 854x480, Other) [_] Anon 2727045 Marked for deletion (old). >> [_] Anon 2727083 No, it can't melt them. However, it can weaken them. And when weakened steel beams have too much pressure on them, they collapse. DEBUNKED. >> [_] Anon 2727090 YOU DON'T HAVE TO MELT THE BEAMS THEY DROP IF THEY'RE HOOOOOT, THEY DROP IF THEY'RE HOOOOOT. SING SO EVEN NIGGERS HEAR, THEY DROP IF THEY'RE HOOOOOT, THEY DROP IF THEY'RE HOOOOOT. >> [_] Anon 2727100 actually, COAL can melt steel in the situation. If you just get steel and throw fuel on it then no, it won't melt. If you get steel, stick it in a furnace and apply liberal amounts of jet fuel then yes, you should be able to melt steel as you're trapping the heat inside. However, what >># said is also extremely relevant. >> [_] Anon 2727125 Before 9-11, most people wouldn't believe that crashing an airplane into a skyscraper would cause it to collapse. So if 9-11 was faked, why would they create a scenario that most poeple wouldn't believe? Why not just plant bombs in the buildings and say the terrorists did it? >> [_] Anon 2727202 >># really? study physics. you should get on with your life. >> [_] Anon 2727255 >># Well personally if I was to perform a conspiracy/ false flag operation I'd make it complicated as hell for no discernible reason and symbolic in one form or another with heaps of human interest stories. If you are going to kill 3000 people you have to do it justice at least... If they just came down with it looking like a controlled demolition and said "yep terrorists" there would be a much greater investigation. >># It's a stupid argument, all of the jetfuel would have gone in the explosion when the plane hit anyway. >> [_] Anon 2727258 The argument is that they found molten metal in 911. Jet fuel plus the high winds as well as the fact that the sides of the building was still mostly intact would easily manage to get hot enough. >> [_] Anon 2727269 >># not at all. steal does not get hot enough with just those factors. especially end up deformed from the heat. >> [_] Anon 2727272 >># >can't melt >CERTAINLY can't NOT melt You sound retarded :^) >> [_] Anon 2727274 >># Also, even though I like JFCMSB as a meme, what I really never understood about it is, why does it need to? Since when does a plane taking out multiple floors of a building NOT make the building collapse? It's not even about the melted steel really, sure that's the main reason for the Jet Fuel meme, but it's not the only thing they're saying. >> [_] Anon 2727278 >># http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bellows Burning jet fuel in a mostly enclosed area with high winds. >> [_] Anon 2727283 >># Not to mention that a large amount of other things could easily have caught fire inside the building. >> [_] Anon 2727304 >># I'm not arguing one way or the other, but modern-day skyscrapers are built with tremendous security margins. If these buildings can survive huge earthquakes by fucking swaying around and looking like the leaning tower of pisa for the entire duration of the shaking, and come out perfectly fine at the end, then it wouldn't be far fetched to say that some large object taking out the fronts of a few floors on the upper half of the skyscraper wouldn't cause it to topple over. >> [_] Anon 2727397 Why don't we get some jet fuel and set some steel on fire to see if this is true that it melts, guess the fuck what, it's not. Wtf is wrong with you all. I'm gonna hold my lighter up to a bank vault and it should melt it, or I'll just dumb some gasoline on it, tee hee. You fuckers are brainwashed and beyond sheeple, you need help. Btw, jet fuel, if I remember correctly burns rather quickly. Reinforced steel beams being melted by basically gasoline. Please go fuck back off to the middle ages. Random tower demolition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaBQ3AkR etI Twin Towers (Apparently collapsed perfectly by some melted steel beams with gasoline): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ft2uIYuc sXo Notice any similarities? Check this shit out too retards. B-25 smashes into Empire State Building in the 1950's. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-25_Empire _State_Building_crash It didn't collapse. >> [_] Anon 2727399 >># :^] >> [_] Anon 2727401 >># B-25 bomber plane smashes in the Empire State building, shit doesn't collapse. >Bomber plane >Military plane >Building not collapsing >> [_] Anon 2727402 >># >>>/pol/ >> [_] Anon 2727403 >># The bait was too sweet anon, too sweet, I fell for it, forgive me of my sins mighty Moot! >> [_] Anon 2727409 >># >being a military plane makes it more powerful, anon! >has a wingspan 3 times smaller than a 747 >> [_] Anon 2727411 But can jet fuel melt human beans >> [_] Anon 2727417 >># >piston engine bomber of the 1940s carrying crago >being as devastating as a modern 757 loaded |
|