File: 71bbb43049.swf-(1.41 MB, 480x480, Loop)
[_] Anonymous 05/24/16(Tue)13:13:19 No.3086973
>> [_] Anonymous 05/24/16(Tue)13:27:54 No.3086978
>>3086973
tfw no song source in swf.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/24/16(Tue)13:37:46 No.3086984
fuckin quality flash. song source?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/24/16(Tue)13:39:30 No.3086986
Shazam'd the song, it's Louie Lastic - Close2u
>> [_] Anonymous 05/24/16(Tue)13:52:41 No.3086990
>>3086973
Youtube source of the video? Or is this an OC flash?
>> [_] Anonymous 05/24/16(Tue)14:55:21 No.3087023
>>3086990
google dancing guy in the green shirt
>> [_] Anonymous 05/24/16(Tue)14:56:55 No.3087024
>>3087023
I'm talking about the flash video, since I doubt it's OC, and it's probably just a cut from some
full video that might be on youtube.
>> [_] The Labeler 05/24/16(Tue)14:58:43 No.3087026
>>3087024
It was originally titled "Dream Feet" in a cool looking font. STOP RENAMING FLASHES
>> [_] Anonymous 05/24/16(Tue)15:00:06 No.3087027
>>3087023
>>3087024
>>3087026
yeah, just found it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-R1O7FN3yI
Extended version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQ2ESrAmlOI
>> [_] The Labeler 05/24/16(Tue)15:03:15 No.3087029
>>3087027
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5L1tr0PIx20
double dream feet!
>> [_] Anonymous 05/24/16(Tue)15:12:08 No.3087034
>>3087026
Does flash support 60 fps? Cause the video is available at 60, so I could remake the flash into a
slightly higher quality one.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/24/16(Tue)15:16:29 No.3087040
OP's flash isn't perfect, with lots of stutters, so I did it anyways, I'll name it the original
YT name, and repost it some time after this one expires.
>> [_] The Labeler 05/24/16(Tue)15:17:56 No.3087041
>>3087034
I believe so, but people using firefox like me can't run flash above 60fps.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/24/16(Tue)15:19:15 No.3087043
>>3087041
>above 60
that's ok, the video is 60, and YT doesn't support more, so you don't need to worry.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/24/16(Tue)15:25:39 No.3087045
>>3087034
Flash supports 120 fps.
120 fps has been supported by flash for at least 15 years now.
>> [_] Anonymous 05/24/16(Tue)15:26:37 No.3087046
>>3087045
Gotcha, thanks
