STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR | Archived flashes: 229595 |
/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/ | P0001 · P2595 · P5190 |
This is resource J040U86, an Archived Thread.
Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3109480/protect-your-a… Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 37. Discovered flash files: 1 File: BoysBeware.swf-(5.07 MB, 320x240, Hentai) [_] Protect your anal integrity Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)00:26:15 No.3109480 Statistics on these kiddy cornholing homos imgur.com/QRivRSs Marked for deletion (old). >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)00:40:32 No.3109482 STRANGER DANGER >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)00:41:45 No.3109483 I wish I lived in old school America where people could still feel safe hitch hiking in general. It looks so much nicer then it is now... christ. >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)00:44:13 No.3109484 >>3109483 It was great if you were a white male. Not so great if you were anything else. Or if you weren't ok with the constant fear of nuclear war. >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)00:50:33 No.3109485 >>3109484 Women from back then looked pretty happy and were treated really well. Pretty sure women from back then were on average much happier then women now. >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)01:25:41 No.3109497 >>3109484 >muh oppression >muh equality >much patriarchy Blacks kill each other more now than white men ever did. Lesbians, spinsters, and career women will die without ever gazing on the faces of their children. White men were the greatest and most just rulers in the world. >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)01:28:30 No.3109498 >>3109497 oh my >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)01:45:55 No.3109503 >>3109498 Go away George Takei. >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)04:02:37 No.3109540 >>3109503 Now you're a homosexual for making it rhyme. >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)04:16:08 No.3109544 >>3109483 You shouldn't, things were just as shitty back then as they are now, only now medical science is far ahead and instead of the impending threat of nuclear annihilation we have the impending threat of radical Islam. >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)04:21:47 No.3109546 >>3109544 I agree with the other guy. Back then they didn't cater to those with mental illnesses known as fags and whatever the things back then would have been called that wish they could become a tranny. Unless they went into crossdressing, which Im going to guess not all of them did. >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)04:38:46 No.3109550 >>3109485 And if they weren't happy enough, they got the shit beat out of them. >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)04:43:37 No.3109552 >>3109546 Nah, they just made paranoia films accusing them of being child molesters, and if you were outed you'd most likely get the shit beat out of you. Everything was so much safer back then. >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)04:47:59 No.3109553 >>3109552 Getting the shit beat out of you because people didn't like you doesn't sound safer. >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)04:51:59 No.3109555 >>3109553 no one got beat up it was a civilized time >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)04:53:21 No.3109556 >>3109555 What time period are we talking about again? >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)04:57:00 No.3109557 >>3109556 The mid-late 50's and early 60's I guess >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)05:04:00 No.3109558 >>3109557 And no one got beat up then is what you're saying. I'm not going to be able to find anything about people getting the shit kicked out of them. >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)05:15:35 No.3109560 >>3109558 Not sure I'd go that far but crime rates were very low. >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)05:16:35 No.3109561 >>3109484 No, it was pretty great for everyone >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)05:21:33 No.3109566 >>3109560 Any data for that? >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)05:29:16 No.3109569 >>3109566 Don't have all the data on hand. I can tell you that overall crime rates really started spiking by the mid 60's (64-65) and started going up steadily after that. Compare 1960 : 3 mill crimes / 288 thousand violent 1970 : 8 mill crimes / 740 thousand violent 2014 : 9.5 mill / 1.2 mill violent Though for 2014 the population was considerably larger so the gap is smaller then it looks. Couldn't find 50's stats unfortunately. >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)05:41:57 No.3109570 >>3109569 Why the huge jump from the 70s to 2014? Is it because the crime rate actually starts going down? And at a glance of US population between the 70s and 2014, the crime rate appears to be nearly identical, with non-violent crime in 2014 actually being slightly lower than it was in the 70s There's also questions of reporting and tracking of criminal activity. I'd hardly say the modern system is perfect, but it's far more capable of tracking crimes for statistical purposes. Of course, there's issues of unreported crime, but I have no knowledge in the subject to actually be able to say one way or another. >> [_] Anonymous 07/05/16(Tue)05:50:11 No.3109571 >>3109570 >And at a glance of US population between the 70s and 2014, the crime rate appears to be nearly |
|