STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR | Archived flashes: 229595 |
/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/ | P0001 · P2595 · P5190 |
This is resource FFWV0QV, an Archived Thread.
Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3209712/orrifying Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 22. Discovered flash files: 1 File: Fish People.swf-(2.82 MB, 320x240, Hentai) [_] [o][r][r][i][f][y][i][n][g] Anonymous 02/01/17(Wed)04:28:45 No.3209712 Marked for deletion (old). >> [_] Anonymous 02/01/17(Wed)04:41:45 No.3209716 Would you fuck a chick with gills, /f/? >> [_] Anonymous 02/01/17(Wed)04:49:21 No.3209718 >>3209716 Would a chick with gills fuck /f/? >> [_] Anonymous 02/01/17(Wed)06:22:27 No.3209740 I could deal with the fact that fish poop in the water that I drink, but fishpeople pooping in it? I'll have one of those waterfilters, o humble salesman. >> [_] Anonymous 02/01/17(Wed)06:50:41 No.3209751 Too bad he's nuts, he makes good points at times. >> [_] Anonymous 02/01/17(Wed)06:59:29 No.3209754 >>3209712 When he genuinely says stuff like this it makes it hard for me to see why people believe anything he says. >> [_] Anonymous 02/01/17(Wed)10:34:41 No.3209805 >>3209754 He's not wrong about everything. But when he is wrong, it makes people less likely to believe what he's right about. He's controlled opposition. >> [_] Anonymous 02/01/17(Wed)10:57:08 No.3209817 >>3209805 >He's not wrong about everything. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. >> [_] Anonymous 02/01/17(Wed)11:00:50 No.3209821 >>3209817 And when it's broken, you might assume it's wrong, always, even when it's exactly the right time. >> [_] Anonymous 02/01/17(Wed)11:27:01 No.3209832 Alex Jones is a conspiracy profiteer. He may believe his own bullshit, but what matters to him is caching in on the paranoia of his audience. He claims to investigate inconsistencies in official stories, yet he's a dyed-in-the-wool christian. You know, that religion based on a self-contradictory, quasi-historical fairy tale book? He publishes innuendo and rumor like it was fact and his research is limited to the echo chamber of conservative blogs and conspiracy circles. >> [_] Anonymous 02/01/17(Wed)11:43:15 No.3209834 I wouldn't mind having a function set of gills. Sign me up for the fish people program. >> [_] Anonymous 02/01/17(Wed)12:54:49 No.3209858 >>3209834 I like that you went back to the original question after 7 or so comments about Alex Jones. >> [_] Anonymous 02/01/17(Wed)13:08:24 No.3209863 >>3209805 >He's not wrong about everything If there are actually times when he has ever been right, I would be shocked. Alex Jones is sensationalist bullshit to the highest degree, which means he's very likely to take actual facts and sensationalize them to the point where there's nothing valid about what he's saying. >> [_] Anonymous 02/01/17(Wed)13:22:09 No.3209869 >>3209863 Well then "be shocked" because he has been right about shit loads of stuff over the years. Yes he is an entertainer and at times he will go off the rails and if you simply focus on those occasional outbursts you'd have no reason to take him seriously but aside from those situations he is generally right about 50% or more of the shit he talks about and given that you probably don't follow him to any real extent or have actually researched for yourself many of his claims or assertions you come off as a typical ignorant mainstream tard parroting the insults you've been taught to say towards those who don't obey the establishment who we must all blindly trust and obey. I am also not saying that Jones is nessasarily a good guy. He could very well be controlled opposition with those "crazy bursts" used to discredit all the legitimate criticisms he provides of Government and other powerful figures/institutions but in the end he is certainly no less "trust worthy" then the Governments propaganda media system and if you do your own research and don't just blindly trust any source you'll find out whats true or not true and yes alot of what he says is true and a fair bit is also not. Not really complicated. But if you're mocking him relative to more "mainstream" news outlets atleast the types who have channels on television then you're stupid because he is certainly not less credible or less honest then they are and he is far less benign. >> [_] Anonymous 02/01/17(Wed)13:24:07 No.3209870 >>3209869 Sorry I meant he is far more benign (less evil/harmful). >> [_] Anonymous 02/01/17(Wed)14:01:47 No.3209877 >>3209869 >but aside from those situations he is generally right about 50% or more of the shit he talks |
|