File: Meanwhile in Europe.swf-(9.6 MB, 640x360, Loop)
[_] Just accept it. Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)13:05:55 No.

  Just like what happened centuries ago, they're invading.
  And everyone is too much of a PC pussy to do anything about it.
  cuz #HumanRights

Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)13:26:48 No.

  >it is a mr 60% tells which countries are white
  Also keep /pol/ posting in /pol/

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)13:30:22 No.

  >>3186146
  Yeah but your Muslim percentages are higher and more rabid.
  France right now is teetering on civil war and people, even police have lost their sense of
  safety due to violent youth (aka Muslims) gangs and individuals.

  That is a bigger danger in the long run. Many Hispanics are just smart enough to potentially
  assimilate into our European culture over time or thats the hope anyway.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)14:03:31 No.

  >>3186142
  HM really does have a sick OST

  Anyway, see ya in the race riots OP!

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)14:09:43 No.

  >>3186147

  Where are your sources my dude this sounds like a rabid racist generalizing everything. Crime?
  Fuckin muslims. Gangs? Fuckin muslims.
  Also
  >White people having culture

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)14:49:41 No.

  Roughly similar Sufi Zikr dancing. The original Techno.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)14:50:43 No.

  >>3186164
  https://youtu.be/gWEuj7gt5bk?t=23m11s

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)15:00:49 No.

  >>3186153
  If "culture" is what you call the changes Muslims make to Western areas then I think we're far
  better off without it.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)15:08:31 No.

  >>3186153
  Hey, maybe your US whites have lost all culture due to leaving their homeland, but we still have
  it.

  t. sinterklaas.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)15:40:11 No.

  av it!

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)15:41:07 No.

  >>3186168
  IMO culture is the root problem of everything because our disagreements with each other, both as
  people and as groups, materialize either from a clash of cultural beliefs("I don't want you to do
  that thing" vs "I do this thing because it is part of my heritage") or a dispute over resources,
  the latter of which could probably be solved if the former did not continue causing problems.

  Stated in other words, if the entirety of humanity was a monolithic entity where people didn't
  waste time categorizing as "us" or "them" but instead just worked towards forward advancement of
  basic and then non-essential needs, we'd all be better off.

  Too bad we can't just turn individuality off. Most people would probably prefer humanity die off
  even if that was an option, though.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)15:51:52 No.

  >>3186174
  I disagree.
  Not all ethnic groups are "the same" and neither are cultures.
  Diversity and multiculturalism are just stupid ideas that even at their best can do very little
  good and at their worst very much harm.
  Its also a fact that all these ideas from racism to diversity & multiculturalism never sprung up
  naturally as popular ideas among any peoples but were pushed onto populations by ruling elites
  and their media for reasons and with intentions that I would say fall well into the line of evil
  rather then good.
  I don't hate anyone simply for looking a certain way or for being part of any religion but it
  doesn't change my opinion on the foolishness of the ideas mentioned above atleast in much of the
  world the way it is constructed today and based on who is pulling the strings.
  I don't blame you for not seeing the truth, not many do.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)15:56:37 No.

  >>3186153
  Muslims are fucking degenerate by nature anyways. So fuck you.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)16:02:59 No.

  >>3186177
  I don't actually see any counterpoint to my post in yours. Obviously different ethic groups and
  different cultures are different from each other. That's the problem. We argue over our
  differences instead of being productive. It doesn't have to be about the way people look or
  religion, either. We argue over whether abortion is acceptable because some people have been
  brought up believing it is not okay for whatever reasons and other people have been brought up
  believing otherwise. The same format can be applied to any dispute about what is acceptable to do.

  This has nothing to do with multiculturalism (or racism or diversity, for that matter). I'm not
  advocating for multiculturalism. I'm advocating (well rather, I'm fantasizing, as this is an
  impossibility) for something more like... non-culturalism. That would be a situation where people
  do not have beliefs about what is right or wrong as a result of the up-bringing, and nor do they
  have a particular objection to their own suffering when it is beneficial to others. I'm speaking
  about the idealized form of a world where humanity exists as some sort of hivemind working
  towards... some goal. As with any other idealized form, it's not something that can actually be
  attained in reality (but perhaps an idealized form like I'm describing moreso than others, as
  this stumbles at the step of being implemented in the first place rather than the step of being
  correctly, "flawlessly" executed).

  Basically, I'm wasting everybody's time.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)16:22:16 No.

  >>3186142
  to be honest i'd rather have my percentage of muslims than the percentage of blacks that USA has

  americans like to point and giggle but dude, you've got the blacks...

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)16:23:56 No.

  >>3186187
  apologize

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)16:24:14 No.

  >>3186188
  id rather be shot.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)16:25:19 No.

  >>3186182
  I sorta get what you're sayin but part of me thinks it'd be simpler just to keep seperate ethnic
  groups seperate.
  The more powerful and developed nations can still help the other groups form and sustain their
  own societies. Not beyond reason obviously but we can give some resources to try and help
  everyone. Even simpler peoples can be helped to develop perhaps simpler societies that aren't
  overly developed or productive but are stable and peaceful.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)16:27:18 No.

  >>3186189
  I doubt that, sir.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)16:28:33 No.

  >>3186187
  At least blacks don't try to change our entire country. The worst part is, places that aren't
  Ameri-burger land will roll over and take it up the ass for these Muslim faggots and give them
  everything.
  At least our cancer, aka the blacks are content to be subjugated by a clearly superior race...
  and the good ol' American Government.

  Muslims behead people, rape, force their religion on regions and everyone claps while they do it.
  Our Niggers might rape and murder but at least they aren't an organized religion and the majority
  of rape and murder is on other blacks.

  Good luck to Europe because unless y'all suddenly become as Based as other parts of the world,
  like us here in the USA, you'll be Muslim'd sooner or later.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)16:30:25 No.

  >>3186192
  Not offline-shot, duh. IRL I wouldn't have the balls to speak my mind in the first place.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)16:31:07 No.

  >>3186195
  Don't be overly cocky my friend.
  they have been that way in the past but we have the BLM cancer at the moment and some dead police
  on our hands. They've been let off the leash by the left and soros. We know that.
  But yeah, still better then Muslims.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)16:32:41 No.

  >>3186198
  also we're inviting in alot of Muslims lately.
  We haven't yet approached Yoorop level but if it doesn't slow down soon we could have a similar
  probably on our hands eventually.
  I also think the numbers are somewhat underplayed. You know how Obama works.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)16:33:32 No.

  /pol/ ruined /f/.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)16:34:13 No.

  >>3186198
  BLM has done fuckall compared to the progress Habeeb n' Friends have made, let's be real. I mean,
  even with Soros, Liberals and the Clintons having media monopoly, Donald Trump still won. So I'd
  give America a solid 7/10 on resisting Nigga-try and Muslim cock-worship.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)16:35:45 No.

  >>3186200
  You say that like 4chan isn't a cesspool in the first place, m8. I'm not gonna say "lurk moar"
  but 4chan has always been the opposite of politically correct, my friend.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)16:43:22 No.

  >>3186191
  But for what reason would a powerful, developed nation help other groups?

  I'm going off on a different tangent now than my previous posts. If a developed nation chooses to
  help a non-developed nation, why would that be? Ultimately, I think it's because the developed
  nation seeks some benefit from the non-developed nation. That benefit may be one that isn't
  expected to pay off immediately, such as being able to trade profitably in the future the the
  other country once it has a more developed economy, or it could be as some kind of diplomatic
  leverage with another developed country, or it could be other reasons. In any case, what you
  don't see are developed nations helping undeveloped nations just for the sake of human goodness.
  The individual people and the groups that make up nations object to this, usually out of a sense
  of nationalism and/or patriotism.

  In any case, while we could argue the merits of whether it's beneficial to keep different ethnic
  groups separate geographically, politically, or both, I'd like to quickly point out that I don't
  think it would be simpler to do so in any sense of the word. You'd not only need a system to keep
  this ethnic arrangement in place, but also a near-universally accepted belief system that extends
  across ethnic borders to justify such an arrangement. And, obviously, it's always going to be
  hard to convince the people that do not benefit from a system that they should continue
  participating in it. That goes back to the "them" and "us" thing, but that's another topic...

  Ultimately, the idea of keeping ethnic groups separate from each other hits several hurdles. New
  cultures and ethnic groups can emerge from old ones, even if existing ones stay isolated from
  each other. Also, without extreme isolationism that prevents all interaction, separate societies
  with fight against each other for resources. Preventing that would require everyone to cooperate
  as one society (my earlier posts), which is impossible.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)16:48:33 No.

  >>3186203
  I've been here since '08. This place has always been shit, but the shit changed and most of it
  was at least tolerable. Now it's just incessant pseudo-intellectual political shit and "haha
  niggerz and joos am i cool and edgy yet" that leaked from the failed containment board that is
  /pol/.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)16:54:26 No.

  >>3186208
  >Also, without extreme isolationism that prevents all interaction, separate societies with fight
  against each other for resources
  Yeah, that is something I didn't think about.
  In regards to border protection I don't think it would be a probably for the more developed
  nations but in less developed nations it could be more of a problem. The big boys might have to
  step in to handle issues like that though I wouldn't imagine them happening all that often.
  Also yes it would have to be done like Japan with force and legal means but once the people of
  the world knew immigration was pointless to attempt it would mostly stop.
  Anyway we're just playing around in fantasy world now and none of this will ever happen so.
  Lets just hope things go well for everyone.
  Take care.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)16:58:44 No.

  >>3186211
  Just goes to show how much people hate Blacks and Muslims then.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)17:03:54 No.

  ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

  Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when
  the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

  The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or
  Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote
  assimilating unquote with them.

  Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white
  countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

  What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds
  of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

  How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about
  the final solution to the BLACK problem?

  And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man
  wouldn’t object to this?

  But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white
  race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

  They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

  Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)17:06:36 No.

  ﭑﭦ

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)17:08:55 No.

  >>3186220
  >White countries create instability in Africa, South America, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East
  >This instability leads to a diaspora of people wanting to escape and live better
  >This diaspora mostly moves into the nearby areas that are stable, which are the white nations
  that caused a lot of the problems in the first place
  >WOOOOOOOOOW WHY DO WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH THIS PROBLEM THIS IS SO UNFAIR TO US!

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)17:14:10 No.

  >>3186223
  I forgot about all the Muslim people Sweden killed.
  Damn blood thirsty Swedes.

  Also blaming the citizens of Western countries for the military actions of the elites is wrong.
  If it were up to the citizens we probably wouldn't have had any of our post-WW2 wars/military
  actions and its debatable if we would have gotten involved in WW1+2 either.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)17:17:12 No.

  >>3186227
  >Also blaming the citizens of Western countries for the military actions of the elites is wrong.

  The fucking ironing is too real.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)17:19:08 No.

  >>3186220
  You're not experiencing a genocide though. I mean, you're not experience what is literally
  defined as a genocide, which includes deliberate murder for the purpose of purging a group
  (typically, but not exclusively, an ethnic group).

  Maybe the real problem is that people care more about their own genetic lineage than the
  collective genetic lineage of humanity, AKA "our species"? If we zoomed into a far future where
  different races of humanity had differentiated enough from each other to actually stand as
  different species (meaning the different races have lost the ability to interbreed with each
  other), what do you think would happen? Compare that to a different potential far future, where
  the various races have interbreeded so much that "race" as a term has lost meaning. Are one of
  these possible futures inherently preferable to another in your mind, and if so, why?

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)17:25:11 No.

  Catchy song.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)17:27:21 No.

  >>3186230
  You're ignoring the media, political and educational factors which promote anti-nativist racism
  and discrimination and reward the promotion of out groups over the in group.
  The native group ends up becoming a badly discriminated against and dispossessed minority in his
  own land and may still be used as a scapegoat for societal problems.
  Perhaps this is a bit hyperbolic compared to what the reality would be like (though deeper stages
  would be harder to predict) but it has truth to it.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)17:30:40 No.

  >>3186220
  id rather have people who have the same cultural work ethics such as asians and whites. it's sort
  of what america is right now, but there's gotta be a less controversial way to apply a filter on
  the degenerates from society.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)17:42:33 No.

  >>3186142
  NEVER.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)17:43:34 No.

  >>3186153
  google "France No-Go zones"

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)17:52:52 No.

  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_German_federal_election,_2017
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_Swedish_general_election,_2018
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_Dutch_general_election,_2017
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_French_presidential_election,_2017

  The worst part is that nationalistic parties aren't even that high in the polls. Even Austria
  voted for some green SJW instead of Hofer.

  This continent is doomed.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)17:56:45 No.

  >>3186203
  >tolerating shit board leakage

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)17:57:02 No.

  >>3186241
  https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/01/19/fox-news-retract
  s-allegation-of-no-go-zones-for-non-muslims/

  Try reading a news source that have a shred of journalistic integrity.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)17:59:58 No.

  >>3186248
  This was due to a fucking cuck tv channel forcing all their viewers to send mail to fox news. I
  have to admit fox news exaggerated the claim, but there is really no go zone in france if you
  don't want to get fucking robbed. In belgium also, trust me

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:01:22 No.

  >>3186250
  For my personal curiosity, can you give some specific examples?

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:04:24 No.

  >>3186248
  ignorance is bliss my friend
  just keep looking at the world the way you do now
  probably for the best

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:04:26 No.

  >>3186250
  >>3186248
  To continue, I live in Belgium and I know which people I must not look in the eye, I learned it
  during the years walking home from school. Now I live in Bruxelles and I have to say life is a
  lot better here, even if there is molenbeek full of extremist, and terror attacks few months ago.
  Because here in Bruxelles, violent arabs don't notice you, there is just too much people to exist
  for them. But go in a little city like Liege or Verviers, where you are alone in the street and
  there is a group of muslim on a bench, and you will see the no go zones.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:09:53 No.

  >>3186251
  In france, all around Paris there is a lot of ghetto. But it's not gun ghettos like in chicago,
  it's just full of young and poor 1 or 2 generation foreigners messing with every one. Basically
  it depends on the type of person you are. If you are alone, well dress, young, or a girl, they
  smell you it's amazing. And you see them approaching you, a bit shy at first, they say shitty
  things like "Hey I know you, you own me money dude !"

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:11:09 No.

  >>3186255
  And then you know the end. Roubaix also

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:11:52 No.

  >>3186245
  not true for sweden, SD got a huge chunk in the 2014 election compared to previous years and i
  expect it to go up even more next time in 2018.

  the link you have does show a huge chunk (third biggest party) but it might be bigger in reality.
  not many people dare to make their opinion known publicly in polls, in sweden we have completely
  anonymous voting so you can actually keep your politics to yourself. i've been voting for SD
  myself three times in a row now and not a single soul knows about it, all my friends hate SD and
  i claim to vote for S myself (don't want to commit social suicide)

  this is probably why it was such a surprise for people that trump won despite being behind in
  polls, when asked many people won't give their honest opinion.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:12:49 No.

  >>3186250
  >>3186252
  >>3186253
  Those are some great sources you provided.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:17:07 No.

  >>3186258
  it really doesn't bother me if you don't believe
  just saying the rabbit hole is deep and ugly
  thats my opinion I suppose, take it as you will
  if you really have interest in these things then do your own research and judge for yourself how
  you think things are

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:19:31 No.

  >>3186259
  >anon makes absurd claim about race relations and foreign culture in a country
  >ask for a source
  >anon provides a google phrase
  >provide a source that not only refutes the claim but has proof of the people who made the bogus
  claim retracting their statements
  >WAKE UP SHEEPLE

  The /pol/lercoaster never ends.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:20:43 No.

  >>3186258
  Ho yes, because there is actually academic study on the percentage of muslim robbing people on
  the street, yhea. Every time a muslim insults someone, a chip in his brain sends a message to the
  police station. Amazing time.
  http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/20/world/europe/fox-news-becomes-unwilling-star-of-fr
  ench-tv-show.html
  Canal plus is a channel for people living in the capitals, urban, white, "bobo".

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:23:23 No.

  >>3186263
  are you saying we should put chips in their brains??

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:25:55 No.

  >>3186263
  I legitimately have no clue what the fuck you're trying to say.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:28:52 No.

  >>3186142
  In Iran we do the same thing to Christians, as you Americunts do to the Natives. We breed them
  right out of existence with blood quantum. In Iran, we have no rights but in USA, you have
  rights, but act like Iran.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:28:53 No.

  >>3186257
  Nah, it was a surprise for most people because Trump seemed to be committing political suicide
  repeatedly with outlandish scandals like mocking a disabled reporter, refusing to pay his own
  workers, and of course the well-known "grab 'em by the pussy" bit. So a lot of people figured,
  you know, that there's no way someone who does and says these things so often could be elected.
  But his appeal to white middle-class people, a group Hillary more or less ignored, meant that he
  actually had a large group of voters that were willing to support him despite those scandals.
  Combine that with the fact that the pre-election polls really weren't trustworthy in the first
  place (but you have lots of people trusting them anyway) and the fact that you have lots of
  people that are Democrats and did support Hillary in theory but who couldn't be assed to actually
  vote when Election Day came around, and it's understandable that people ended up getting
  surprised.

  In the end though, it was actually a closer race than you'd think just from looking at the map of
  electoral votes. So it's also not like Trump won in a complete landslide, which probably would
  have been even more surprising.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:30:34 No.

  >>3186267
  Christians are the natives here, though.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:33:30 No.

  >>3186266
  I'm trying to say that I don't see how I could provide sources proving 1-2 generations south
  african migrants are more violent than others. Well just know that here in Belgium, we all know
  we have to avoid these people, but nobody says it out loud, except the retards. We shut up and
  have learned to live with it.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:35:47 No.

  >>3186270
  > We shut up and have learned to live with it.
  And that's exactly the problem.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:36:19 No.

  Hey at least you britbongs have brexit coming up because it was recently approved to make the
  referendum legitimate in forwarding the position of leaving EU. That won't stop the censorship
  laws and history reading laws however.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:36:27 No.

  >>3186268
  I don't have the details of the mocking incident but it could have been taken out of context.
  Trump mocked alot of people using the same hand motions, so unless he was mocking the mans
  disability (doubt he would go there) it probably was just unintentionally bad looking.

  The workers thing... sounds alittle bad but without actual details I can't know if it was
  potentially warranted or not.
  If the workers only showed up 10% of the time and paper mached it then yeah it could be legit. Or
  maybe he was just an asshole and didn't pay because it came out wrong. I don't have those facts.
  That story though didn't really jar me that much.

  The pussy thing was literally nothing.
  He said girls throw themselves at him because of his celebrity and they "let him" (his words)
  grab them.
  It was crude lockerroom talk but nothing further.
  No different then a rockstar saying how his groupies let him do anything he wants to them even
  fuck em in the butt. Crude sure but not a crime unless you thought Donald was a saint (he isn't)
  but if that means he occasionally chases some tail... (or used to) its not the end of the world
  for me.

  Also in the popular vote it was close but Donald won a huge percentage of states... and we are
  the united states. That matters to me and is reflected in the electoral college where he won by a
  rather good margin.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:37:16 No.

  >>3186270
  It's the same here in the US with some neighborhoods. The only difference is the majority of
  people don't conflate that to mean a giant conspiracy of blacks trying to destroy white culture.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:39:12 No.

  >>3186274
  That's because you bought those slaves.

  Muslims have been trying to invade Europe for hundreds of years. Ever wondered why the people in
  the Balkans look so Turkish? It's because they're descendants of Ottoman rape babies.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:41:32 No.

  >>3186142
  Meanwhile in America
  www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHgxOXEQaFU

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:43:53 No.

  >>3186278
  our jews love us

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:46:01 No.

  >>3186276
  It's been over a thousand years. If you're going to cite history then learn the history. Also
  Christians spent hundreds of years trying to take Jerusalem. Obviously that means western
  intervention in the Middle East is an attempt to expel Islam from the area. Do you see why this
  fallacious line of thought is not based in sound reasoning?

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:47:29 No.

  >>3186280
  yeah yeah
  Western society has built the modern world and all the technology. We raised everyone in the
  world up 10 notches. We earned our land.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:48:34 No.

  >>3186281
  >I'm not racist but these people are inferior to us

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:49:10 No.

  >>3186280
  Do you know where Islam originates from? From the Arabic peninsula, it aggressively spread from
  there destroying the native cultures. The Crusades were a reaction against the aggressive
  expansion of Islam.

  Have you ever wondered why the Quran mentions Jews and Christians but the Bible doesn't mention
  Muslims? It's because Islam wasn't around at that time.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:50:51 No.

  >>3186282
  racist was a word invented by Leon Trotsky and promoted by Lenin

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:52:47 No.

  >>3186282
  Don't have to be racist to wanna live in an ethno-state (as most of our Western European
  ancestors chose to do and based immigration policy on (later changed by Yewish influence)).
  Are Japanese people evil for choosing to maintain a mono-ethnic nation?

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)18:57:58 No.

  >>3186283
  >Do you know where Islam originates from? From the Arabic peninsula, it aggressively spread from
  there destroying the native cultures.

  Do you know where Western civilization originated? A small tribe in central italy raped
  neighboring villages to expand their population and then aggressively expanded to conquer most of
  modern day Europe, North Africa, and Asia Minor. Civilization was forged in the crucible of war
  and cultural clashes form the basis for modern society. This isn't an Islam thing. Open a book
  once in a while.

  >The Crusades were a reaction against the aggressive expansion of Islam.

  False. The expansion of Islam was halted at that point. The Crusades were a retaliatory invasion.

  >>3186286
  >Don't have to be racist to wanna live in an ethno-state (as most of our Western European
  ancestors chose to do and based immigration policy on (later changed by Yewish influence)).

  The motivations behind the desire for an ethno-state are textbook racism.

  >Are Japanese people evil for choosing to maintain a mono-ethnic nation?

  They don't choose to maintain anything close to a mono-ethnic nation. They cultural are very
  xenophobic but there are few laws on the books to actively promote that. Japan is far from an
  ethno-state and in-fact the government is actively pursuing a much more lenient immigration
  policy because of the declining population growth-rate which is thought to be linked to their
  economic slump.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:02:54 No.

  >>3186290
  Having a preference for your race and wishing to avoid the potential pitfalls and issues a
  multi-ethnic society can bring with it does not mean you are racist (as in you dislike or hate
  people from other races).
  And even if it was racist, who cares?
  It is never a sovereign countries obligation to allow foreigners to join their country.

  And for all intents and purposes both Japan and Israel are ethno-states and they choose to be
  that way. Also Japan is not changing its immigration policy and such ideas are tremendously
  unpopular there. They may let a few White teachers in but nothing that would ever threaten their
  mostly homogenous country.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:14:26 No.

  >75 replies
  Can't wait to see what all the fuss is about
  >it's /pol/fags arguing

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:15:54 No.

  >>3186273
  No, the popular vote wasn't close at all, Hillary has a lead that's large even when examined from
  a historical angle and it's still growing. What I meant was that Donald Trump won a lot of those
  states by relatively small margins and things very well could have gone differently in a few of
  those states. If Hillary's popular vote lead were distributed differently, a hundred thousand
  here, a couple hundred thousand there, she would have ended up winning.

  That said, I do agree with you in regards to respecting the decision of the electoral college.
  The whole "not my president!" thing is silly. This is our bed, as Americans. For better or for
  worse, we're going to lay in it.

  Anyway, the workers thing was the biggest scandal to me. There are a lot of reported incidents of
  it out there, including people working for the man's own campaign. It wasn't just one story,
  there have been several, some of which predate his campaign for the Oval Office and others which
  happened during the campaign.

  http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/09/06/usa-freedom-girls-sue-trump-campaig
  n-for-stiffing-them.html
  http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-staff-idUSKCN1181CV
  http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/attytood/Philly-cabinetmaker-We-went-broke-after-
  Trump-stiffed-us.html

  Those were the three "big ones" that I think most people heard about; some distinctly
  non-volunteer members of his own campaign group that went unpaid, the "Freedom Girls" dance group
  that never got paid for performing at his rallies, and a man recounting a story about how his
  father's family business was destroyed after Trump refused to pay for an expensive completed job.
  That last one mentions another article that has yet more examples.

  http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/06/09/donald-trump-unpaid
  -bills-republican-president-laswuits/85297274/

  And then there's the thing with Trump University, which is really a whole subject unto itself.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:16:05 No.

  >>3186293
  >Having a preference for your race and wishing to avoid the potential pitfalls and issues a
  multi-ethnic society can bring with it does not mean you are racist (as in you dislike or hate
  people from other races).

  Having a preference for your race IS RACISM. It's the belief that your race is superior which is
  the textbook definition of racism.

  >And even if it was racist, who cares?

  Because the idea of pursuing a single ethnicity or culture and keeping it stagnant in a bottle is
  ridiculous. You expel the Muslims from Germany and then move onto the next minority that has been
  their slightly longer, and the next. And so on in the pursuit of something that isn't realistic.
  You'll need to cut off all foreign influence with your country or any form of globalization that
  would threaten to alter the culture. You'd also need to cut off all new forms of media/literature
  from outside of your country because have those brainwashing your people into believing they're
  not superior. Not to mention good luck maintaining any sort of diplomatic ties with a country if
  their citizens/culture is not welcome in your country or you've outspoken against their culture.
  There's no realistic end-game for that mindset.

  >It is never a sovereign countries obligation to allow foreigners to join their country.

  It's not an obligation, but it's a diplomatically shooting yourself in the foot.

  >And for all intents and purposes both Japan and Israel are ethno-states and they choose to be
  that way.

  Israel is an ethno-state just like other secular states in the region. It gets a pass on that and
  other ridiculous shit because the holocaust which isn't right. Japan isn't an ethno-state. They
  don't have laws that govern people ethnically-Japanese differently than people ethnically-not
  Japanese, i.e. the definition of an ethno-state. Culturally they do that but it's state-based.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:23:07 No.

  >>3186296
  It reminds me that earlier today, or maybe yesterday, a thread hit ~30 replies and there was some
  newfag thinking it was a record.

  But if it's not politics or porn, does /f/ even really care to talk about it?

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:23:28 No.

  >>3186299
  >nonsecular

  I always confuse those two.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:25:56 No.

  >>3186299
  >Having a preference for and feeling more comfortable in a community with people who are more
  like you and have more in common with you is not racist.
  You make it sound like its hard to be mono-ethnic but most European countries for the majority of
  their histories were ethno-states including America and they did just fine.

  Also certain races are arguably (on average) superior to others on some level.
  No legitimate science believes that all ethnic groups are equal in terms of intelligence,
  capability or behaviors.

>> [_] Heaven 12/07/16(Wed)19:27:03 No.

  Go back to youre containment board

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:31:06 No.

  >>3186305
  >You make it sound like its hard to be mono-ethnic but most European countries for the majority
  of their histories were ethno-states including America and they did just fine.

  For the majority of their history they didn't have a globalized economy and forms of
  communication. And they weren't ethno-states either because they didn't have laws on the books
  that prevented immigration or treated immigrants differently than regular citizens. In fact, over
  time they have added laws that prevented social discrimination of those groups.

  >No legitimate science believes that all ethnic groups are equal in terms of intelligence,
  capability or behaviors.

  I'm terribly interested to see some sources for this legitimate science. People refrain from
  /pol/ infographics that cite studies that aren't academically funded.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:31:27 No.

  >>3186299
  Of all the people in this thread, you are the dumbest of them all

  83+ replies and counting!

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:35:30 No.

  I cant /f/ap to this

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:37:07 No.

  >>3186311
  >didn't have laws on the books
  America's early immigration laws said specifically "free whites only"
  Even for most of the 1900's we have strict immigration laws that made it very difficult for any
  significant number of non-White Europeans to immigrate here.

  I don't know about European states.

  Also a globalized economy does not require human capital infusions from non-European countries
  and said immigration hasn't been good for us (and mass immigration in general is usually bad for
  developed countries regardless of ethnic type).

  I gotta go but I recommend you read this article by a very famous college professor.

  http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/11/america-as-a-promised-land-for-jews-thr
  eatened-by-muslims-israel-and-white-identity/

  Really helps explain why our immigration laws were changed and it wasn't for good...
  Take care man, good talkin to ya.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:39:29 No.

  >86 replies

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:39:42 No.

  (You)

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:41:48 No.

  >>3186318
  (((you)))

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:42:38 No.

  >people fleeing from war and poverty are planning an invasion and hostile takeover
  You lads need to get out more.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:43:43 No.

  >>3186316
  >America's early immigration laws said specifically "free whites only"
  >Even for most of the 1900's we have strict immigration laws that made it very difficult for any
  significant number of non-White Europeans to immigrate here.

  "White" isn't an ethnicity.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:44:18 No.

  >>3186142
  Iran, is the home of the Aryan, true and proud. We will conquer and prevail.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:44:50 No.

  >>3186312
  You seem frustrated that you can't provide evidence to back up your radical beliefs. Take this
  (You) as a consolation prize.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:45:42 No.

  >>3186321
  >"White" isn't an ethnicity.
  And yet those were the words of the law back then.
  Really makes you think.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:46:28 No.

  >>3186305
  Who was Franz Boas?

  >>3186315
  /f/ is not just for XXX, remember?

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:53:12 No.

  >>3186324
  You're missing the point. Calling America an ethno-state is not supported by those immigration
  laws because those laws don't enforce a specific ethnicity.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:53:25 No.

  >>3186325
  >Who was Franz Boas?
  A science denier and a Marxist/leftist sounding "emotional" thinker who claimed that all ethnic
  groups were the same (without evidence) and believed in some dumbass sjw type theory that all
  cultures are equal and that nothing is truly good or evil and nothing is for certain and blah
  blah IDIOT.
  He'd fit in well today as some professor of diversity courses in some elitist college.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)19:58:35 No.

  >>3186326
  Well America "coincidentally" managed to stay almost 100% White outside of their freed slaves up
  until the yewish inspired immigration act changes of 1965.

  Also we had origin of birth laws before that which stated that most immigrants had to come from a
  handful of European countries which were coincidentally homogeneously White and European.
  C'mon man. You're just denying reality here and the very real and embraced racial tribal norms of
  the past.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)20:03:54 No.

  >>3186259
  The sheer ignorance of /pol/ users is inspiring

>> [_] 100 12/07/16(Wed)20:05:09 No.

  >>3186331
  not an argument

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)20:11:13 No.

  >>3186323
  >unironically believing all races are equal

  You can live your whole life believing that

  to 200 we go

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)20:12:47 No.

  >>3186329
  >Well America "coincidentally" managed to stay almost 100% White outside of their freed slaves up
  until the yewish inspired immigration act changes of 1965.

  This is complete hyperbole. Aside from the fact that the black population from the 19th century
  onward never dipped below 10% there were plenty of non-White, non-European immigrants to the US.
  One small snippet

  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_immigration_to_the_United_States#Immigration_1930_to_2000

  There were laws to curb large influxes of ethnicities but never any laws on the books that said
  "No X ethnicity allowed" after the abolition of slavery.

  >You're just denying reality here and the very real and embraced racial tribal norms of the past.

  I'm not denying anything. I'm telling you for a country to be an ethno-state, it has to have laws
  that prohibit people outside of a specific ETHNICITY from entering the country or gaining
  citizenship. There was and has never been any instance of America that would meet that definition.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)20:14:30 No.

  >>3186337
  Still waiting on that evidence. If it's such an obvious and fundamental principle then surely
  providing some credible evidence to support it shouldn't be that difficult.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)20:21:42 No.

  >>3186339
  And im saying America did maintain its ethno-state other then the addition of the freed-slave
  class.

  Look at the last decade before the immigration law changes.
  1950's :
  Whites = 89.5%
  Blacks = 10%
  Others = .5%

  So yeah... other then freed slaves (unusual situation on the whole) we allowed in a whopping .5%
  of the population from other ethnic groups.
  So had the elites not brought in slavery for cheap labor we'd have been 99.5% White in the 50's.
  That not good enough to be called an ethno-state?
  We also had Jim Crow laws which segregated that Black populated and limited their rights further
  enforcing my point.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)20:26:33 No.

  just go to /pol/ or something

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)20:28:54 No.

  >>3186337
  Are you familiar with the phrase, "there are no races, only clines"? Do you think that when
  someone is talking about different ethnicities they're talking in D&D-like terms where black
  people uniformly have +2 STR, -2 INT and Europeans get bonuses to all their mental stats?

  If you're going to try and tell me that some races are inherently better than others, you better
  be ready to show racial differences that can be traced to a genetic level. Or do you believe in
  phrenology, too?

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)20:29:44 No.

  >>3186346
  Good lord, dude. How many times do I have to explain to you White is not an ethnicity. Want an
  adequate example of an ethno-state? Russia during the Bolshevik Revolution and after it became
  the Soviet Union. They sent every NON-RUSSIAN (not read as "non-White") to a small shithole
  region and isolated them from the rest of the country. They had extraordinarily strict
  immigration laws and most people who entered the country, especially without Russian ethnic ties,
  was treated as a second class citizen at best and got a knock on their door one night at worst.
  That is an ethno-state because they enforced ONE ethnicity, Russian.

  Now for the love of God stop saying that Jim Crowe laws promote a ethno-state because White and
  Black are not ethnicities. They are races.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)20:32:38 No.

  >>3186350
  So if you put a group of ten Norwegians in a foreign with an average IQ of 117 and they competed
  with a group of 10 Abbo's with an average IQ of 60 in mental exercises and challenges that one
  group wouldn't clearly win?

  That isn't to say Abbo's are stupid or something.
  But just like the gift of intelligence can vary greatly amoung individuals of the same race
  intelligence levels and behavior patterns can be remarkably different (on a big picture scale)
  between different ethnic groups.
  That doesn't mean I would seek to classify one as superior or allow the mistreat or un-equal
  treatment of said people.
  Humans are all beautiful and the even the dumbest human is still an incredibly intelligent
  creature and the smartest creature on earth (sans its other humans).

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)20:34:36 No.

  >>3186351
  Ok then a unique group of Europeans mostly from the same specific areas that all shared a common
  culture, religion and were far more similar to eachother genetically then they would be to any
  non-European ethnic group.
  Its the same shit bro... atleast in my opinion.
  But it really doesn't matter if we agree on it so lets just drop it. You see it your way, I see
  it mine.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)20:38:01 No.

  >>3186142
  Holy shit. I've never seen a thread this long on /f/.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)20:46:34 No.

  in this timeline /f/ is the new /pol/

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)20:53:36 No.

  >Be white for thousands of years
  >Establish a sophisticated and prolific culture
  >Give it all up on a whim because America said so
  I mean, shit, I can understand why America gives theirs up so readily since they don't have
  culture to begin with.

  But why is Europe so eager to take in Muhammad's cock?

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)20:54:18 No.

  >>3186353
  No, I wouldn't say that 117 IQ folks wouldn't win, I'd say all you proved is that these ten
  people are smarter than those ten people. You haven't proved why this is; you're demonstrating
  that these ten people are smarter and then immediately attributing it to race instead of
  considering any other possible factors like, say, whether or not those Aboriginals ever received
  any schooling.

  If you're trying to say that the differences correspond to ethnicity, then that is a problem we
  can fix with cultural and social engineering. If you're trying to say that the differences
  correspond to exclusively to race and genetics, then you have a lot more work to do in proving
  the difference was not to do any other factors. Even if, hypothetically, science did prove that
  some races and/or ethnicities are genetically superior to others in some ways, that'd just mean
  we need to get on the ball with an organized eugenics program rather than xenophobically crusade
  for racial and ethnic purity defined by our nations.

  I have other stuff to do tonight though and at some point I need to get back to grinding levels
  for my Mareanie. This conversation has been enlightening in some ways, but I'm leaving the
  discussion. Have a good rest of your day, everybody.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)21:06:21 No.

  /f/ is the new /pol/ beware jewish $hill$!!!!11!

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)21:39:12 No.

  >>3186234
  there is, its called war.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)21:52:39 No.

  toasting in ebin bread

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)21:56:26 No.

  >>3186251
  Mollenbeek in belgium and Malmo in Sweden are good examples. Also, Birmingham, parts of London,
  parts of Paris.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)22:01:40 No.

  lets make it 118 replies!

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)22:02:19 No.

  >>3186378
  >b-but that makes it 119!

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)22:03:10 No.

  >>3186379
  >imblying i'm not 120

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)22:09:06 No.

  >/f/ thread
  >more than 10 posts

>> [_] Anonymous 12/07/16(Wed)22:11:03 No.

  Are we being invaded by /pol/?