STORY   LOOP   FURRY   PORN   GAMES
• C •   SERVICES [?] [R] RND   POPULAR
Archived flashes:
227917
/disc/ · /res/     /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/P0001 · P2559 · P5117

<div style="position:absolute;top:-99px;left:-99px;"><img src="http://swfchan.com:57475/42401095?noj=FRM42401095-29DN" width="1" height="1"></div>

This is resource HZXDXJ5, an Archived Thread.
Discovered:8/11 -2016 00:45:02

Ended:8/11 -2016 05:21:42

Checked:8/11 -2016 05:34:42

Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/thread/3173190/maga
Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 36.
Discovered flash files: 1





File: CAN'T STUMP.swf-(5.23 MB, 720x800, Loop)
[_] [M][A][G][A] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)18:42:14 No.3173190

  No matter the outcome tomorrow, the patriotic ride gave me a glimmer of hope for our country that
  I hadn't seen in a while, so it was fun riding with you lads.

Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)18:52:38 No.3173192

  DAWN OF THE THIRD DAY

  72 HOURS REMAIN

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)18:54:39 No.3173193

  >>3173190
  I'd pump my stump in that anime girl's rump if you know what I mean. And I think you do.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)19:00:05 No.3173196

  >>3173193
  why don't you just fuck her anon?

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)19:06:47 No.3173200

  >>3173196
  Woah there anon, fuck a girl? What do I look like, a faggot?

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)19:10:25 No.3173206

  >>3173190
  As much as I'm going to enjoy /pol/'s tears between tomorrow night and the heat death of the
  universe, I won't deny that the online movement had unprecedented energy for a Republican nominee.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)19:13:15 No.3173208

  >>3173206
  That's the power of memetic magic and controlling the collective unconscious.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)19:36:23 No.3173226

  independant fag from last night here.

  God speed to both candidates.

  How you guys doing tonight?

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)19:37:24 No.3173227

  >>3173226
  independent*

  fuck, too much schoolwork

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)21:07:55 No.3173254

  >trump wins
  >libtard tears

  >clinton wins
  >polfag tears

  It's going to be great either way

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)21:09:28 No.3173255

  >>3173254
  for about a wekk yes, what about the rest of the four years

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)21:10:52 No.3173256

  >>3173255
  I don't even live in America so lucky me.

  Good luck to you guys that do, having to pick between two fuckwits.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)21:11:12 No.3173257

  >>3173255
  I don't live near enough to any major tactical position such that the nukes will hit me and my
  degree is not situational.
  I'll be fine.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)21:13:03 No.3173259

  >>3173254
  See you say that and I get it. I'm not crazy about Trump. However, the smugness of modern
  libtards make this an easy choice for me. I know it sounds crazy, but Trump is closer to Sanders
  than Hillary. He's hated by his own party for chistssakes. Who's all the banks and foreign money
  going to? Not Trump.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)21:19:29 No.3173263

  >>3173254
  More like
  >Trump wins
  >'Murilard tears as the new POTUS ruins 100s of years of deplomacy, one leader at a time

  >Trump loses
  >'Murilard tears as a small portion of their population tries to start a 'civil war' against the
  "illegitimate" new government

  It's gonna be some real fun shit anon, get some snacks and watch the fireworks.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)21:25:17 No.3173267

  >>3173259
  There's no way to word this in a way that won't sound antagonistic, but what specifically will
  Trump do to benefit the American middle class?

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)21:36:17 No.3173271

  >>3173263
  >Trump wins
  >[crickets mixed in with the sounds of catlady sobs]
  >Trump loses
  >Thermonuclear war, more money in the middle-east, infinite debt works, white people cease to
  exist as a major demographic and taxpaying base

  >>3173267
  >major restructuring of taxes that largely benefit the middle class, albeit not as much as the
  poor
  ignoring possible (probable) economic benefits from his policy on business, regulatory reform,
  and protectionism
  >improvements in rights and civil protection largely enjoyed by the middle class
  >immigration reform that, by nature, improves communities
  These are the specifics that apply directly to the middle class rather than socially or at large
  (abstract policy).

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)21:39:34 No.3173273

  >>3173271
  Yeah sure buddy, just so you know repeating a mantra doesn't make it come true in the real world,
  just in your fantasies.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)21:39:55 No.3173274

  >>3173257
  you live in laponia or some shit?

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)21:42:00 No.3173276

  >>3173274
  Don't be silly, no place in Gulliver's Travels is real.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)21:48:24 No.3173277

  >>3173276
  Australia it is then

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)21:49:09 No.3173278

  >>3173271
  >major restructuring of taxes that largely benefit the middle class, albeit not as much as the
  poor
  His plan for tax breaks leaves less money in my pocket than Clinton's.

  >improvements in rights and civil protection largely enjoyed by the middle class
  Specify.

  >Thermonuclear war if Trump loses
  D E L U S I O N

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)21:49:10 No.3173279

  >>3173267
  Whom do you think will do a better job of negotiating trade deals that will maximize jobs in the
  USA while keeping prices low? Clinton or Trump? Who will be more apt to send troops to foreign
  countries? Clinton or Trump? Who is more likely to be in the pocket of big banks? Who did the
  banks donate to? Clinton or Trump?

  You tell me.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)21:50:40 No.3173280

  >>3173279
  None of those are concrete policies. Not an argument.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)21:54:36 No.3173281

  >>3173279
  Not him but...

  Clinton quite obviously, a free market is always better at allocating resources than a closed
  one, and real job growth into new fields and markets requires flexibility, not hardheaded
  protectionism laws.

  Depends on what it's over, neither is truly non interventionist.

  Pure rhetoric, won't even bother to respond to this one.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)22:02:35 No.3173284

  >>3173278
  >His plan for tax breaks leaves less money in my pocket than Clinton's.
  Because it just does! Don't question it. The longterm implications and immediate breakdowns
  suggests otherwise.

  >Specify.
  Second amendment support, explicit and overwhelming support for law enforcement and a return to
  effective and dramatic policy to restore civil order, general improvements to the collapsing
  Healthcare system, major infrastructure projects that will revitalize the public well-being and
  local economies as opposed to mere life-support programs. Keystone pipeline will finally fucking
  happen and OPEC stops mattering to joe blow's budget.

  >D E L U S I O N
  You are deluded if you cannot read the writing on the wall, especially the wall is literate and
  screaming said words at you constantly and loudly.
  It is entirely probable we will stop at a ground war, but Hillary means the end of proxy wars
  through secular dictator assassinations and mark the start of active conflict with Russian
  operators.
  Make no mistake, though, the people actually fucking involved in these decisions on both sides
  unilaterally disagree with you.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)22:14:26 No.3173286

  >>3173280
  Neither of the candidate have concrete policies that they are bound to uphold.

  >>3173281
  Like the protectionism of trade unions pushing for tarrifs? Like subsidizing green technology?
  Who is being hardheaded?

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)22:47:44 No.3173297

  >>3173286
  >Ree they took our jerbs pass jerb laws to keep jerbs
  >But also fuck unions that cause people to get paid for those jobs a living wage, and anything
  that interferes with the market (even if it 'creates' jobs too)
  You don't get to have it both ways you little shit.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)22:49:07 No.3173299

  >>3173208
  AKA hive mind and teenagers

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)22:53:48 No.3173302

  Trump might be a big mouth douche at times but atleast his heart is in the right place.
  Brainwashed Demoparrots are the one supporting a political party of dishonest, corrupt
  authorization communists who only wish for two things
  to maintain absolute power and to have the power to surpress or silence anyone who opposes them.
  Their party is controlled by big banks, big corporations and other transnational interests. They
  don't give a single shit about you or this country.
  Even if you win it is nothing to celebrate. Evil won this day, not good. Nothing good will come
  of this.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)22:55:15 No.3173303

  >>3173302
  authoritarian*

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)23:02:08 No.3173307

  >>3173273
  >Hillary and Kaine say ad verbatim "this country will speak Spanish in the near future"

  Yeah, what a great campaign cry. "Your time is over cretins, time to die and make way for our new
  peons." Even hispanics don't like Hillary.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)23:07:06 No.3173309

  >>3173307
  Yeah, how dare they hope the country speak more than one language, one that's spoken by
  neighboring countries, and larger parts of south America (who happen to be major trading
  partners). God forbid 'Muricans speak more than 'murician, I mean what are we? Filthy European
  faggots who are expected to learn at least 4 languages in high school? REEE FUCKING HILLERY
  REEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)23:13:36 No.3173311

  >>3173309
  Go fuck yourself you globalist slave.
  There is zero reason American's should be learning some craphole countries language.
  If the people from said craphole are lucky enough to be given the charity of being allowed to
  live in our great country they should learn our language.
  And no significant portion of the nation needs to speak language to trade goods with another
  country as has always been the case since forever so thats just a retarded argument.

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)23:17:10 No.3173312

  >>3173311
  Keep screaming that nationalist retoric, I'm sure you might find some some young dumb shit who's
  never seen a war who will believe it LOL!

>> [_] Anonymous 11/07/16(Mon)23:20:56 No.3173314

  >>3173309
  Why should we speak Spanish, when the important countries, and our closest allies, speak English?
  Canada, the UK, Australia, and New Zealand are some of our closest allies.
  Why abandon our history as part of the anglosphere?
  If anything, we should learn German and French, as France and Germany are some of our other
  closest allies.
  Or Japanese, or Korean.



http://swfchan.net/36/HZXDXJ5.shtml
Created: 8/11 -2016 00:45:02 Last modified: 8/11 -2016 05:34:49 Server time: 29/03 -2024 05:46:28