/ > /fap/ > Thread 10186
Age: 30.72d Health: 0% Posters: 17 Posts: 23 Replies: 21 Files: 1+3
>> Anonymous 26nov2016(sa)09:08 No.41519 OP P1
Taco
Yay
[IMG] Armossss.swf (2.22 MiB)
650x1000, Compressed. 227 frames, 24 fps (00:09).
Ver15, AS3. Network access: No. Text: Yes.
Bitmaps: Yes. Audio: Yes. Video: No. <METADATA>
[find in archive]
>> Anonymous 26nov2016(sa)12:41 No.41524 A P2R1
Is there anything different about this version?
>> Anonymous 26nov2016(sa)14:25 No.41527 B P3R2
number keys still toggle sounds
G, B & N make noises not sure about effects
spacebar finishes
>> Anonymous 26nov2016(sa)19:39 No.41533 C P4R3
password
Greenriver
Gabe
Nextreveal
Neverrest
Bewareoblivionisathand
all but one is just link to videos
>> Anonymous 26nov2016(sa)19:48 No.41534 D P5R4
>350$
Fuck boogie.
>> Anonymous 26nov2016(sa)20:56 No.41535 E P6R5
>>41534
???
>> Anonymous 26nov2016(sa)23:41 No.41536 F P7R6
>>41534
>>41535
someone paid a lot of money for this flash, it started a super long reply chain that, like most
long reply chains on this site, was a bunch of totally up their own ass dumbshits arguing.
>> Anonymous 27nov2016(su)00:28 No.41537 D P8R7
>>41536
It's a reskin,for 350$
There's no sane reason to pay that much for a reskin.
>> Anonymous 27nov2016(su)02:04 No.41541 G P9R8
>>41536
A literal retard pays 350 dollar for this pile of trash and you defend him by saying "people who
reply 2 each other are stupid. I'm superior to you all because I'm mommy's special little boy!1"?
>> Anonymous 27nov2016(su)05:55 No.41545 H P10R9
To non-US, for comparison, a PS4/Xbone costs $250.
So a low-effort reskin of this flash http://eye.swfchan.com/flash.asp?id=169901&n=shygirlfuck.swf
made in a few hours costs more than a modern console.
>> Anonymous 27nov2016(su)06:04 No.41546 I P11R10
>>41545
I'd still rather have this than a modern console
>> Anon 27nov2016(su)12:26 No.41552 J P12R11
Anon
>> Anonymous 27nov2016(su)12:33 No.41553 K P13R12
if you can't get the urls, then just click these links and get these "eastereggs":
http://www.patreon.com/NotBoogie
http://xopachi.tumblr.com/post/125710010655
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIx6_Srsrog
https://youtu.be/VStklrDrQ50?t=7m47s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcaTg2POkwU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hN1cJDJXncg
https://youtu.be/AZJUZfjB6YM?t=1m10s
And here the passwords again: (just enter the text in the ""-field)
this.eEgg = new easyTextEgg2(true,true,"1234 ");
this.eEgg.addKey("greenriver",this.eggg);
this.eEgg.addKey("bewareoblivionisathand",this.run);
this.eEgg.addKey("neverrest",this.possibility);
this.eEgg.addKey("gabe",this.shitpost);
this.eEgg.addKey("nextreveal",this.d);
>> Anonymous 27nov2016(su)21:37 No.41563 F P14R13
>>41541
>>41545
>reskin
so like you know even if that was the case, (ite not) don't act like there no work what so ever
involved in making this
in fact the armos flash has different moving parts, completely different art, different camera
movement, different cum animations, and even different dicks. is anything was possibly reused it
was POSSIBLY the rigging for the moment of the girl and even that unlikely because the art and
"angle" make it so that the animation hinges the knees for the humping is in completely different
places
and that whats being paid for, art assets, programming, and that artists time and effort.
but hey its cool to know that you know so little about flash, animation, and commissions, you have
no real idea how to argue your point, which is a simple yet understandable "wow that seems like way
too much money for this small animation!"
tl;dr
>8/10 you made me reply
>> Anonymous 28nov2016(mo)01:37 No.41571 L P15R14
>programming
>blablabla, I'm retarded
Compare both actionscripts, they are exactly the same, he didn't even changed the variable
names(shygirl.variables all over), so yes, it's literally a reskin, not a inch of "programming" was
done, so shut your face.
It can be done in few hours(that's the bad part of streaming your "art process", we know how much
time it take).
Besides it was cheaply done, wrong pussy position, no light effects(the free shygirl base animation
was better), no shadow, the cum animation was copied, the background is a static jpg, your lovely
"camera" effect is in the same actionscript code from the shygirl animation, one-digit frames
loops, nothing here values the costs of it.
>> Anonymous 28nov2016(mo)02:42 No.41572 D P16R15
>>41563
You are one giant,cum guzzling defender of this retard.
>> Anonymous 28nov2016(mo)05:00 No.41573 M P17R16
>>41571
Holy fuck, for real? Man this guy should get a refund.
>> Anonymous 28nov2016(mo)18:38 No.41580 N P18R17
>>41573
And all these "easter eggs" were put in without the consent of the guy who paid for it, the creator
didn't even tell him they were there.
>> Anonymous 1dec2016(th)03:18 No.41626 O P19R18
>>41580
Hey, I'm here. Boogie told me they were added after he shown me the completed version, so these
were for his version. If he told me about it, I was gonna request that he could add a hidden
message of my own design.
i also had suggestions for other things the armos should do, like for her to do that bounce and
sound fx those time telling rocks in oot did when you hit them, but declined them due to feature
creep; with code apparently being reused, i can see why he wanted to avoid it
>> Anonymous 1dec2016(th)23:40 No.41639 O P20
Commissioner here. In response to the allegations of reskinning and other complaints, he says:
"Nah, that version used the shygirl code because it’s the same basic structure (loop, cum, cum
loop, cum cum) and I figured why not just recycle that of it’ll cut the wait. I later updated it to
a not-spaghetti engine when I had some free time to standardize the base.
And it wasn’t a reskin, so no. Similar setup - bouncing on a cock, which is what you wanted - but
made from scratch on the timeline. I don’t think shygal would even reskin properly if I wanted her
to, that file is a mess and her proportions and connective joint overlaps are way different.
And nigga, someone’s always going to complain about something. Sway like a tree, not a leaf."
>> Anonymous 2dec2016(fr)01:42 No.41641 M P21R19
>>41639
Sounds like a grade A douche.
>> Anonymous 2dec2016(fr)05:51 No.41643 D P22R20
>>41639
I think he's full of shit,but it's your choice whether or not to believe him.
>> Anonymous 2dec2016(fr)11:35 No.41645 P P23R21
Jerked to it.
If the guy who wanted the commission is fine with burning $350 on porn, I'm alright with it.
