|STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES|
C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR
|/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/||P0001 · P2030 · P4059|
Since it's exceptionally easy to only block the actual ads on swfchan (no ads are actually served from swfchan's own domain) and because the current ruleset is actually causing visitors to see more ads I thought this matter would be quickly resolved. However, I have been trying to contact EasyList for over three weeks now with no response. Therefore I feel the need to ask my visitors to e-mail them as well to bring attention to this issue and show that regular users of EasyList care about swfchan, not just the guy running the site.
They have two e-mails: firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com. The first one is the primary mail but I've sent mail to both and received a reply from neither. Have sent using different mail accounts as well so I know there was no sending issues on my end. I should have written this announcement earlier but this whole thing felt like such an open-and-shut case that I would never have imagined swfchan still being blocked like this after three weeks. Big thanks to anyone helping out!
Note: I'm not writing this because of money, the site's income is actually the same as before (less visitors but less blockers equal same ad views). I am however worried that in the long run, in a year or so, this may lead to less links leading to swfchan which would sure enough finally kill it off the web, especially with the dwindling flash support these days. I also don't think this is a fair practice by EasyList, there's no reason what-so-ever to block swfchan itself. I don't serve ads and an adblocker should block ad providers, not sites that use ad providers. I also don't limit anyone blocking ads from using the site in any way. It feels like the EasyList authors took just a minute to look at swfchan, said "fuck it" and proceeded to block the whole thing instead of only the ads.
So if you have a moment I'd really appreciate it if you took the time to e-mail them about this. Just be polite and ask EasyList to block only the ads on swfchan, not the actual content on swfchan itself. There's a discussion thread over here.
This is resource YL6G0SZ, an Active Thread.
Original location: http://swfchan.org/11486/
Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 14.
Discovered flash files: 1 (so far)
/ > /fap/ > Thread 11486 Age: 32.43d Health: 62.57% Posters: 10 Posts: 14 Replies: 11 Files: 1+2 >> Anonymous 18jun2017(su)23:57 No.50514 OP P1 good idea + clean execution = sexy I find this a lot better than the boring gynecological close-up of the average porn. If you disagree with me, you are wrong. [IMG] Are you weak (Samurai Jack) by HardDegenerate (IncestDa...swf (341.2 KiB) 1280x720, Uncompressed. 98 frames, 24 fps (00:04). Ver9, AS1/AS2. Network access: No. Text: No. Bitmaps: Yes. Audio: Yes. Video: No. [find in archive] >> Anonymous 19jun2017(mo)00:25 No.50517 A P2R1 >>50514 true, but still a very short and not well looping ... well, loop voice lines repeating every 2 seconds makes it unfappable to me, but boner potential is spotted >> Anonymous 19jun2017(mo)02:03 No.50518 B P3R2 I mean it would be, if it didn't fuckin repeat itself every 5 seconds. If you disagree with me, you are wrong. >> Anonymous 19jun2017(mo)04:10 No.50522 C P4R3 >>50517 >>50518 Sums it up. >> Anonymous 19jun2017(mo)05:04 No.50523 D P5R4 anyone else changed the scale to see if anything was there? loving the vectors btw >> Anonymous 20jun2017(tu)12:03 No.50548 E P6R5 But is she weak? >> Anonymous 20jun2017(tu)17:43 No.50553 F P7R6 >>50514 >good idea + clean execution = sexy This would be true if this flash was ANY of those things...Nice job blocking the action! By the way, you might want to put a border around it, it looks even worse in full screen. If you disagree with me, you are wrong. >> Shrek 20jun2017(tu)20:36 No.50558 G P8R7 O SHIT HERE COMES MY PTSD AGAIN >WHERE DID YOU LEARN TO FLY? WHERE DID YOU LEARN TO FLY? WHERE DID YOU LEARN TO FLY? WHERE DID YOU LEARN TO FLY? WHERE DID YOU LEARN TO FLY? >> Anonymous 21jun2017(we)15:17 No.50570 E P9R8 But guys, is she weak? The question was never answered >> Anonymous 22jun2017(th)12:30 No.50600 E P10 Guys is she still weak? >> Anonymous 23jun2017(fr)14:36 No.50624 E P11 Answer me! >> Anonymous 23jun2017(fr)15:48 No.50626 H P12R9 she weak. she dead >> Anonymous 23jun2017(fr)19:33 No.50627 E P13R10 thnx >> Anonymous 19jul2017(we)14:30 No.51486 I P14R11 >>50514 >If you disagree with me, you have differing opinion. ftfy