File: What is Fake News.swf-(9.47 MB, 480x272, Other)
[_] Why? Anonymous 08/19/17(Sat)06:26:03 No.

  WHY?!

Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 08/19/17(Sat)07:21:15 No.

  What do you mean why? This is somewhat pretty spot on on most points

>> [_] Anonymous 08/19/17(Sat)07:46:05 No.

  >>3273903
  This was a good analysis. Even though Prager U cares too much about the tribe.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/19/17(Sat)08:20:46 No.

  I'm finding it more and more complicated to find newspapers or news websites that aren't actively
  trying to turn me into a raging SJW or a raging Nazi

>> [_] Anonymous 08/19/17(Sat)11:15:26 No.

  >>3273903
  Why what? He's 100% fucking correct. The mainstream media are greedy, biased, tribalistic cunts.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/19/17(Sat)11:23:01 No.

  >guaranteed_replies.swf

>> [_] Anonymous 08/19/17(Sat)11:26:58 No.

  thats exactly happens in germany all the time

>> [_] Anonymous 08/19/17(Sat)12:11:30 No.

  >>3273921
  You find it hard to not slide into extremism?
  Here is a hint, stop giving a fuck and don't be an asshole, done

>> [_] Anonymous 08/19/17(Sat)12:41:07 No.

  I detect a right bias, focusing solely on the left, instead of lies and cherry-picking done by
  both sides.
  Notice how he mentions 7% of journalists are only Rep's and implies that the rest are Dem's?
  Misleading, in other words, fake news, according to the source they are using The American
  Journalist in the Digital Age by Willnat and Weaver 2013, 50% is "Independent", only 28% identify
  as Democrat, and 15% as "Other".
  They show a clear bias towards the right, so also fake news?
  Not really always the case, sure a bias is part of the picture, but so is factual reporting.
  If certain outlets use quotes out of context, omit or downplay facts to fit their narrative and
  select only certain examples or samples to fit facts to conclusions whether then other way around.
  And yes, I will mention Fox even if this PragerOpinionPiece dude, tries to write it off, Fox has
  not a great track record when it comes to things mentioned above,
  and is certainly "mainstream republican" unless you slowly start drifting to extremism aka
  Breitbart/Infowars.
  Not saying the left doesn't have extremist corners or media outlets that take the standard of
  factual reporting on similar levels like Fox,
  but the process of yelling fake news at everything being put out by the MSM is as worthless as
  this video.

  Sorry, there are no shortcuts to well informed opinions, learn what to trust, what to doubt and
  what to research
  unlike a political sheep everyone wants you to be, regardless of side.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/19/17(Sat)14:50:41 No.

  >>3273921
  You either learn what stinks with a measure of common sense, and avoid certain outlets and
  authors, or you sit back in the safety of your home as the torches start lighting up. There is no
  alternative.

  Hell, most outlets are just fine, especially very generic variety ones. You just have to learn
  how to spot a few keywords, a few phrases, a few tactics that the same filth always uses. Lefties
  always appeal to emotion either positively or negatively, guilting and socially excluding you
  until you submit. They point their fingers at naughty people and call out to you to publicly
  shame them, because "that is obviously the right thing to do." Righties, on the other hand,
  aggrandize their own cause and very specifically point out the mistakes of others, especially
  known persona. They appeal to fact over emotion, although fact does not necessarily always have
  to be true. They also tend to echo a lot less.
  That, however, does not mean that every news agency out there is either a jewish slave or a nazi
  fucker and nothing but. That one article written by a very dubious author with very dubious
  connections pops up does not inherently invalidate all the others. It's a part of normalization,
  and another trait of the lefties - they pepper their agenda pushing out inbetween normal,
  universally acceptable articles so as to make it seem more mundane, more normal. Again, emotion,
  or sociology over fact.

  It's ironic that, the sides have switched, with the right now being rebels.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/19/17(Sat)15:56:06 No.

  Take it to /pol/, faggots.
  Post animu or gtfo.

>> [_] Anonymous 08/19/17(Sat)17:10:18 No.

  >>3273903
  Good video, >>3273969
  See this is a shill, if you point out lefty bias you are biased to the right. Which is not true
  in the slightest.

  And if you are going to bring up statistics and "facts" site your sources faggot

>> [_] Anonymous 08/19/17(Sat)17:11:30 No.

  >>3273969
  >extremism aka Breitbart/Infowars
  lol you really think they are extremist? Spotted the shill or brainwashed your choice

>> [_] Anonymous 08/19/17(Sat)17:47:08 No.

  >>>/pol/
  fuck off