STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR | Archived flashes: 229595 |
/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/ | P0001 · P2595 · P5190 |
A Very Merry Christmas! |
This is resource MH5NZ46, a Archived Thread.
Original location: http://boards.4chan.org/f/res/1160246 Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 17. Discovered flash files: 1 File[[L]SMRPG.swf] - (5.62 MB) [_] [L] Anonymous 01/16/10(Sat)11:32 No.1160246 Marked for deletion (old). >> [_] Anonymous 01/16/10(Sat)11:43 No.1160254 Redone as sketches and with children singing it rather poorly? No. >> [_] Anonymous 01/16/10(Sat)11:48 No.1160258 >>1160254 Better animation and more harmonious voices. Fucking cunt. >> [_] Anonymous 01/16/10(Sat)12:27 No.1160287 >>1160258 bullshit, they sound like they're five POST ORIGINAL >> [_] Anonymous 01/16/10(Sat)12:36 No.1160292 >>1160287 this >> [_] Anonymous 01/16/10(Sat)13:07 No.1160310 I liked it. Sauce for song >> [_] Anonymous 01/16/10(Sat)13:20 No.1160327 Sauce for song? >> [_] Anonymous 01/16/10(Sat)13:51 No.1160341 >>1160287 Is that a problem? This 5 year old singer is a far better singer then the other dude. Hurr durr but I'm a teenager I can't be seen liking stuff with kids in it or else my faggot friends wont think I'm hardcore durr >> [_] Anonymous 01/16/10(Sat)14:28 No.1160362 Even if they COULD sing, there's so much added echo and distortion that it would sound like shit anyway. It's garbage. >> [_] Anonymous 01/16/10(Sat)14:30 No.1160368 wow this shit is terrible. >> [_] Anonymous 01/16/10(Sat)14:32 No.1160370 I get the feeling the people saying this is shit didn't listen past the terrible first 5 seconds, or are tonedeaf >> [_] Anonymous 01/16/10(Sat)14:34 No.1160373 >>1160370 Or are hurrdurr so hardcore underaged b& like >>1160341 said >> [_] Anonymous 01/16/10(Sat)14:43 No.1160386 Original version is superior. It actually HAD animation in it as opposed to that simple shitty paperboard crap. Plus it didn't sound like a bunch of effeminate choir boys with priest dick up their ass. >> [_] 01/16/10(Sat)15:01 No.1160407 >>1160370 Both. And have dicks up their ears. >>1160386 Sir, I feel the need to point out some things in your statement: >It actually HAD animation in it as opposed to that simple shitty paperboard crap Are you saying these quality hand-drawn semi-animated images are inferior to some flash-drawn simple animated crap? I beg to differ. >effeminate choir boys with priest dick up their ass. ...this is a goddamn BONUS, man. I mean, damn ;3c This version is, considering the song's quaity, superior to the original. That is all. >> [_] Anonymous 01/16/10(Sat)15:57 No.1160467 >>1160407 >LOLITROLLU >> [_] Anonymous 01/16/10(Sat)16:23 No.1160489 The singers are probably not native English speakers. >> [_] Anonymous 01/16/10(Sat)16:24 No.1160491 Each one had their own problems, if this one was as animated as the original I would've liked this more, but it doesn't so I'm going to have to go with first, the both win though. This one is good for the cute factor, but the other one was better for the cool factor. |
|