File[ZONE_-_midna_3x_pleasure.swf] - (7.45 MB)
[_] [H] Zone Anonymous 12/10/09(Thu)00:59 No.

  zone zone zone...

>> [_] NoSpoon !fme1pz/mcQ 12/10/09(Thu)01:10 No.

  More [H]

>> [_] Silly Dog 12/10/09(Thu)01:33 No.

  Let youself do nothing off the start until the bar reaches full at the bottom.

  Turn into a wolf. Sex scene occurs.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/10/09(Thu)03:47 No.

  God dammit, Zone needs to stop focusing on making his work so visually complex and just make it
  decent and functional so our computers can actually RUN them. No Zone, we don't NEED a 4th
  quality setting that adds visual bloom to our porn and makes it run at 1 FPS. No, we don't need
  our pointer to be a fairy. If I can't run it at full speed on minimum quality, it's too fucking
  much.

  And normally I'd mention/complain about you posting version 1.0, but since this is an edit I'll
  let it slide.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/10/09(Thu)03:48 No.

  >>1134245
  haha fuck you. Runs great on my PC at High Res and HQ.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/10/09(Thu)03:54 No.

  >>1134245
  damn, all his shit runs perfectly on even my laptop.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/10/09(Thu)03:56 No.

  >>1134245
  ...On second thought, I take it back. Whoever did this edit was retarded. If you make it rise at
  3x the rate but also FALL at 3x the rate (taking into account the fact that Zone's recent bars
  drop every now and then EVEN AS THEY'RE RISING), it balances out to NO DIFFERENCE IN SPEED AT
  ALL. It rises at a jump 3x as big as normal, then falls by a jump 3x as big as normal, SO IT'S
  PRACTICALLY THE FUCKING SAME. The only thing this helps with is achieving the wolf scene quicker,
  but that only has one unique climax, while the normal scene has SEVEN (vaginal/oral/vaginal
  in/out and one for handjob), so this really doesn't help all too much.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/10/09(Thu)04:02 No.

  >>1134246
  >>1134249
  Ok, and what are your PC specs? My laptop is 2 years old, but is still decent and runs everything
  ELSE fine.

  Regardless, is it really necessary to add all this extra shit that nobody cares about (at the
  detriment of some users) when he has proven in the past multiple times that it is not necessary
  to achieve excellence (like Reiko 1 and the anal one everybody posts on a weekly basis)?

>> [_] Anonymous 12/10/09(Thu)05:26 No.

  >>1134252
  Shut your dick, are you paying for it?

>> [_] Anonymous 12/10/09(Thu)07:40 No.

  And nobody complains it's the fucking imp version, not the human version of Midna.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/10/09(Thu)07:54 No.

  Huh so you can turn into a furry with 100 percent in the negative.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/10/09(Thu)07:59 No.

  >>1134340

  Imp? I call it loli.

>> [_] Cotton Eyed Joe !s5rR18z5kQ 12/10/09(Thu)08:01 No.

  >>1134345
  that's just so you don't feel any less imp ortant

>> [_] Anonymous 12/10/09(Thu)08:02 No.

  >>1134345
  It still disturbs me greatly.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/10/09(Thu)08:09 No.

  >>1134347

  Well yeah, at the beginning, I wasabi t disappointed as well, but soon I saw the loli aspect, and
  now I don't see a problem.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/10/09(Thu)08:26 No.

  Also, technically it's more bestiality than furry.

  And I approve of bestiality.

>> [_] Anonymous 12/10/09(Thu)09:14 No.

  *midna porn*

  hm...

  *is imp version*

  FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU