STORY LOOP FURRY PORN GAMES C SERVICES [?] [R] RND POPULAR | Archived flashes: 228088 |
/disc/ · /res/ — /show/ · /fap/ · /gg/ · /swf/ | P0001 · P2561 · P5121 |
This is resource WHEXZME, a Archived Thread.
Original location: http://cgi.4chan.org/f/res/1135434.html Recognized format: Yes, thread post count is 16. Discovered flash files: 1 File[Zeitgeist Rejection.swf] - (1.68 MB) [_] [?] Anonymous 12/11/09(Fri)18:42 No.1135434 Marked for deletion (old). >> [_] Anonymous 12/11/09(Fri)18:45 No.1135439 Well, people also reject Zeitgeist because of the lack of any evidence or even a rational argument and the refusal of it's advocates to address counter-arguments. Maybe include those reasons in the next version of this flash? >> [_] Anonymous 12/11/09(Fri)20:42 No.1135442 TL;DR >> [_] Anonymous 12/11/09(Fri)20:42 No.1135443 Cool story, bro >> [_] Anonymous 12/11/09(Fri)20:42 No.1135445 horrible and nonsensical, gtfo with this trash >> [_] Anonymous 12/11/09(Fri)21:07 No.1135450 simple, is stupid. >> [_] Anonymous 12/11/09(Fri)21:36 No.1135463 this would work great! if niggers didn't exist... >> [_] Moto !7J/FAWBsds 12/12/09(Sat)06:49 No.1135503 There is the problem that very... VERY intelligent people sometimes do criminal acts not out of a reaction to local scarcity but as an act of hedonistic greed. It isn't because they do not have enough, it is because enough is insufficient to their tastes. So long as that emotional response exists in human society *that is until we can "fix" emotional "problems" at the physical level* we will never have what the zeitgeist movement promises. The purpose of government is collaboration for common improvement and defense, sometimes that is from ourselves. Rather than eliminating our defenses, it would be better if society eliminated our internal borders providing a world order rather than a collective of nations. BUT at the end of the day, it seems we're doomed to argue what the name of our world order will be with violence, just like we've argued the name of our one omnipotent omniscient creator. >> [_] Anonymous 12/12/09(Sat)07:14 No.1135507 >>1135503 postulate some more, you psuedointellectual faggot >> [_] Anonymous 12/12/09(Sat)09:42 No.1135558 This was probably an even biger bullshit that the oh so naive zeitgeist movement. Seriously, how the fuck can people come up with stuff like an idea cant be right or wrong. >> [_] Anonymous 12/12/09(Sat)10:25 No.1135575 >>1135558 Ideas aren't just right or wrong my dear troll. when you look at an issue you can disect and find the REASONS an idea is right or wrong. or you could, I dunno. Take an elightened view of matters and decide that "right" or "wrong" doesn't play into it and start judging things by Idealisitic and Worldly measures. >> [_] Anonymous 12/12/09(Sat)10:35 No.1135579 HAIL XENU or something... >> [_] Anonymous 12/12/09(Sat)10:39 No.1135583 The exposition is wrong. Nihilism is not the solution of anything. Be Free by the freedom law give to you, and change law as an instrument of the peopple. Peopple are like a PC program, and law es the code. Man is not a perfect being, so that´s the reason why law fails sometimes or is not fair. >> [_] Anonymous 12/12/09(Sat)10:40 No.1135585 Imagine a world with no government, no money and no guiding principals (A liberal expansion on the item religion). Everyone would have to fend for themselves. This is how it was during the earliest days of humanity, hunting and gathering. Those people would only seek food and safety, and mostly travelled in a large family. They did not seek the answers we have today, such as farming and herding. A society that doesn't seek out answers will fall into stupidity. As for the government, we need to work together as a whole to make a difference. And, even if the last two things didn't make sense, I can explain money. Money is a voucher that grants you things that you aren't skilled at producing yourself. Instead of raising and slaughtering the cow, you can make money and buy a hamburger. Money is a more flexible form of exchange. To take away our advanced exchange system is to destroy tens of thousands of years of progress. >> [_] Alan Shore !L.7AITHTQ. 12/12/09(Sat)10:54 No.1135591 >>1135585 >Every has to fend for themselves >Implying people wouldn't just group back into communities and we'd just restart back at square |
|