File[fagsgottold.swf] - (2 KB)
[_] [L] 30 vs 60 fps Anonymous 12/16/09(Wed)23:33 No.1139455
Just a little flash to show [if your PC and monitor are capable... and "eyes" to] the differences
in framerate for "Gaems"
Marked for deletion (old).
>> [_] Anonymous 12/16/09(Wed)23:53 No.1139473
magic 60
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)00:01 No.1139480
I can see it, but it's not that different
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)00:13 No.1139488
>>1139480
Then my eyes are amazing.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)00:49 No.1139506
On my computer they all go the same speed.. it's too hard on my gpu.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)00:52 No.1139507
>>1139488
So what, 30 fps is a bit shaky. Big deal. It doesn't actually look like that in 30 FPS games, so
whatever.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)01:08 No.1139514
>>1139507
It does to me, thus my eyes are amazing.
I hate games that run at 30fps, they look like vomit to me. I demand no less than 60.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)03:01 No.1139576
the human eye can only actually see up to 60 anyway
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)03:08 No.1139579
Another problem is that the refresh rate of most monitors caps out at 60 Hz unless you have a
damn good monitor and you set it otherwise. So most monitors can't render more than 60 FPS anyway.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)03:34 No.1139589
>>1139507
No, it does look like that, but without a frame of reference like in this flash, and a little
suspension of disbelief, you can ignore the difference easily.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)03:59 No.1139600
120 FPS looks so nice. Yay for my 2 GTX280's and 8800GTX. 8)
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)04:38 No.1139620
>>1139576
terrible troll.
detecting fps by the human eye is entirely up to point of reference. if something barely moves,
10 fps would be unnoticeable. if the entire screen is changing rapidly, it becomes more apparent.
humans can see well beyond 4000 fps, and theres absurdly simple tests to prove it, have a person
sit in a dark room, and produce a bright flash that lasts for 1/4000 of a second. a person will
notice it. herp fucking derp, someone just saw 4000 fps.
in fast paced first person shooters, 30 fps can become obvious, solely because of minor
stuttering, but until theres an unresponsiveness of input due to video rendering times, most
people dont notice and or give a shit.
shits been proven extensively by other fucking studies. now, stop being fags.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)06:58 No.1139663
off topic lol i cant upload anything anymore because it says "dublicate file entry" or something
what do
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)07:36 No.1139668
Agreed! I'm a games designer and I think all games should be AT LEAST 60 fps.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)08:24 No.1139687
>>1139514
Wrong. Get your fucking facts straight.
Furthermore, 30 FPS is what I'd consider the "tolerable" frame-rate. Anything below this actually
becomes physically painful to look at. However, I prefer things to be well above 30 -- generally
50~60 is a comfortable range. Anything higher than that isn't too noticeable.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)08:27 No.1139688
>>1139687
Meant to quote:
>>1139576
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)08:57 No.1139703
I can see the difference between all of them
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)09:08 No.1139708
thank fuck 120hz panels are coming out.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)09:24 No.1139714
>>1139620
that's complete bullshit.
Human eye doesn't have a fast enough nerve conduction velocity to see 4000 frames, the absolute
limit of human visual acuity is about 180-200 frames per second.
Anything more than that and the eye stops processing the information, you see this with what is
called a "wagon wheel" test, where a spinning object approaches that threshold of human limits
and suddenly appears to be spinning in the opposite direction because our eyes can no longer
process the information as fast as the wheel is spinning.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)10:13 No.1139727
>>1139708
Yes but for 3D purposes.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)10:22 No.1139734
http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.html
Please, faggots, please at least read the bottom of this page.
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)12:45 No.1139776
>>1139734
404 faggot
fix your links
nigger
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)12:51 No.1139785
i require a 30 - 60 fps swf. in total 30 balls. so i can see what is really the limit.
anybody can do it for great justice?
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)12:55 No.1139789
>>1139620
>have a person sit in a dark room, and produce a bright flash that lasts for 1/4000 of a second.
a person will notice it. herp fucking derp, someone just saw 4000 fps
actually anyone familiar with photography can tell you that this doesn't prove shit, the
1/4000sec flash of light would be seen because the light would be received during a "frame"
lasting significantly longer than 1/4000
>> [_] Anonymous 12/17/09(Thu)13:11 No.1139803
>>1139687
How the fuck can someone be wrong when they say something like "I don't personally like 30fps
games, but prefer 60fps games".
That's like saying "I don't personally like vanilla ice cream, but prefer chocolate". Then you go
WRONG! Get your facts straight!
What a raging faggot.
