/ > /fap/ > Thread 10086 Age: 45.06d Health: 0% Posters: 24 Posts: 40 Replies: 35 Files: 1+3
>> Anon 40932 Sarah from "The Last of Us" Artist is "SelfDrillingSMS" (aka "SDSMS"). [IMG] Sarah Schlicking.swf (7.79 MiB) 1280x720, Compressed. 3 frames, 120 fps (00:00). Ver17, AS3. Network access: Text: Yes. Bitmaps: Audio: Video: <METADATA> [find in archive]
>> Anon 40994 OH DEAR LORD! I wasn't ready to go fap just yet but you just ran my biological timer down to nothing.
>> Anon 41022 where the hell did you find this; is this patreon only? I can't even find the teaser images for this project of his.
>> Anon 41024 Oh, nvrmd, need to be logged in to Rule34...
>> Anon 41070 The sound is the real MVP in this
>> Anon 41089 >># He probably has mimicked the visuals (including face expressions) from a real porn clip and then used the original sound from there as well. I'd like to see that clip myself just to see how similar it is. If he didn't use any reference and animated everything just from his imagination he's extremely talented. Of course it's impressive even if he puzzled together the thing from several different reference materials.
>> Anon 41100 People should stop converting videos to swf. http://rule34hentai.net/post/view/164416
>> Anon 41101 Protip: Make an account and login
>> Anon 41102 >># You don't convert a video to a flash, you embed a video into a flash container.
>> Anon 41559 This is not at the top? Seriously?
>> Anon 41560 >># Shh, it's hiding to avoid redundant "arguments"
>> Anon 41562 >># can you download files from that website?
>> Anon 41905 >># https://mega.nz/#!5s9VgBCC!Wzio62E2h5YMb 9V6RASqE7Jlh91XA24DEulYtmP1vnk
>> Anon 41908 There is no thumbnail, officer. I didn't know what it was before I started fapping.
>> Anon 41930 Fucking CP warning would be nice. I don't want this shit on my harddrive.
>> Anon 41933 >># >implying is cp Nigger, get the fuck out of my board.
>> Anon 41951 >># >pornography featuring a children >"oh no no no. Child pornography is another thing" Kill youreself.
>> Anon 41952 >># >The pixels are real NO U!
>> Anon 41957 >># Concerning most states in the US,they can't tell the difference,nor care to,legally speaking.
>> Anon 41958 >># >I can't tell the diference between polygons and flesh Nigger, you belong there >>>/facebook/
>> Anon 41961 >># You're still getting off to a character that is supposed to be 13. It's a 3d render of a 13 year old in an explicit situation. It doesn't fucking matter if it's real or not. You get off to kiddies you sick fuck.
>> Anon 41964 >># Not illegal unless you live in some backwards freedomless shithole, your opinion is irrelevant.
>> Anon 41966 >># "O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!" U.S.A!!! U.S.A!!! U.S.A!!!
>> Anon 41969 >># Buddo, you don't really have a solid fucking point here. People get off to all kinds of sick shit that's way more intense, and frankly quite disturbing, than an animation of a digital character masturbating. Difference is, no one gets hurt or is otherwise exploited in 3D animations, ya dig? If you're still offended, I've got a great tip for ya: Throw some money in the general direction of the creator and ask him to release a version that tags her as 18. I'm sure he doesn't mind the extra work required in order to placate you're precious sensibilities. Better yet, check in to a mental health institution since you're clearly quite insane seeing how you fail to tell the difference between reality and animation.
>> Anon 41975 >herp derp it's not pedo because it's not illegal >she is a child in the game plot, looks like a child and sounds like a child >I fap to kids but I'm not a pedophile, this is just sick, brah >I can fap to gay porn all I want, because it's just pixels on the screen, I'm not gay because I never fucked a man IRL Denial at his best.
>> Anon 41981 >># Now where did i say i couldn't tell the difference? i was talking about if a cop saw this shit.
>> Anon 41995 >># If it's not illegal, wtf is your point? "Your fetish sucks"? fuck outta here, bitch
>> Anon 41996 >># USA! USA! USA! Also, I lol'd at your first comment. Didn't mention it before because there was nothing else to add. But now? Now we have freedom to praise. Amuricun fredum.
>> Anon 41997 >># >child porn and pedophilia >"only a fetish lol" My point since the beginning >># is honesty and hypocrisy, turd polishing and doublespeak annoys me. This is child porn, CP(legal, but I never said otherwise) and if you like it you are a pedophile. Stop denying it and distorting the truth.
>> Anon 42012 >># Pedophilia is defined as the sexual interest in children that have not yet reached puberty. Unlike your definition, which seems to denote any sexual interest in persons under the age of 18. Sexual experimentation, such as masturbation, is a clear sign of puberty. That being said sexuality is subjective, and, from a philosophical point of view, is rather difficult to quantify. Speaking of which, the ancient Greek philosophers regularly engaged in sexual activities with young boys, which was not particularly frowned upon -- at least not by the ancient Greeks (this is the etymological origin of the term pedophilia, by the by.) Today, the differences of the varying societies vis à vis sexual proclivities are likely as wide-ranging as the various philosophies during the ages. Activities that are a-okay in one culture or society are seen as disturbed, anti-social, etc. behavior in other cultures. Again, subjectivity comes to mind. The age of consent, for example, varies accordingly. In my country, it's fourteen. Is a sixteen-year-old a pedophile because they engage in sexual activities with a fourteen-year-old? I think not. I guess what I'm trying to say is YOU may believe fapping to underage digital characters implies pedophiliac tendencies, but that's just your fucking opinion. Unless you have anything of value to contribute that doesn't boil down to pseudo-SJW baitspeak, kindly fuck the fuck off.
>> Anon 42013 >># >dodging the main point like a fallacious apologist >using bullshit NAMBLA walltext about ancient Greece to support your disease >using law babbling again, even when none is even trying to discuss it >"it's not illegal, so it's cool and natural to eat shit and drink pee" It's still pornography featuring a children, Child Pornography, CP. No fallacious walltext can help you on that. >INB4: bullshit argument about how masturbation is not pornographic or she is a 1000 years old demoness in a child body Consider ways to end your own life.
>> Anon 42014 >># You're trying way too hard to differentiate yourself from any perceived pedophilia. You'd be the very first person I'd investigate for pedophilia if anything happens. "He was always such a good neighbor, I can't believe he's such a monster!" "But he always seemed so protective towards kids, I don't get it!"
>> Anon 42015 >># Dude, your comprehension skills are abyssmal. Non of your greentext shite comes even close to what I expressed in my post. I would, naturally, try to carefully convey you take your own advice so that the planet may be bogged down by one less nimrod, but I believe you're too stupid to even accomplish that. Again, learn to read or fuck off.
>> Anon 42023 You know we could argue whether or not this is CP or not, and whether you're a Pedo for jacking off to this.... OR We could argue whether it's worth even caring if this is CP or not, and I say it's not. If we include things like this in to the conversation of Child Pornography we essentially undermine the very reason CP should be illegal, not to keep pedos from having fap material but to prevent and discourage the further exploitation and harming of children. Simply put someone who is going to harm a child is going to harm a child, anyone who is going to exploit a child for profit is going to exploit a child for profit, anyone who is sexually attracted to children is going to be sexually attracted to children. Whether or not it is illegal will not change these things. So the question is then that should someone be punished for having, view, and or enjoying an artists sexual depiction of a child if no actual child was evolved in the works creation. I personally think of Lolicon in the same way I think or Soy Burgers. All the meaty taste with no animal being harmed to create the product. Lolicon is Child pornography without having to ask yourself "am I ok with the fact that an actual child had to have been abused to make this." I personally say they're incomparable, save your rage for people who actual child rapists, abusers and those who enable the continued abuse. All that had to happen to make this was a 3D model had to be sculpted, textured and rigged for animation and someone had to animate it and add sounds. No one was hurt to make this, the process of creation of real CP is far darker and grimmer than I care to describe. So as I stated above, pedophiles are going to jack it to CP no matter what, so which would you rather it be to, a CG animation or the real thing.
>> Anon 42029 >># Wew, are you implying that a 17 years and 364 days old guy is basically the same on the kids to adult scale as a 5 year old? I think most people here who jack off to pseudo-CP animations find actual child porn to be horrifying, not only because it was acquired in a appaling manner but also because it's just plain evil. Those are just pixels and people like you make lives of actual pedohpiles raping kids so much easier by dividing the opposition, seriously fuck you. >muh reports about how violent video games actually decreased violence in real life because people now can channel their anger into a video game. I guess the same applies here. Actual people at risk becoming a pedophile might channel their tensions into this instead of fucking a real child and you seriously condemn that?
>> Anon 42030 Btw, same goes for all kinds of sick animation stuff, like gore and shit (although I'm not a fan of that)
>> Anon 42038 Look mom I can clean up the internet by yelling at people for having different fetishes than me This'll get them This is a good use of my time
>> Anon 42053 GUYS, GUYS Guys Maayyyybee she's just a 300 year old shrine maiden fox spirit reincarnation? I mean, she could be for all I care. "She" was created by "pencil" by an artist; is it the canon, that makes her whatever-years-old, because that would be a very stretchable definition. The only "sex" happening here is between you and your fingers, be honest! That's autosexuality you sick bastards! You're all going to hell! But I hand it to them. The photorealism got me on this one... People are just scared of the borders of reality fading. The uncanny valley. Whoops, looks like I'm goint to hell now too. Now to just clean my keyboard real quick...
>> Anon 42207 The last of us was a terrible game, but more 3DCG loli porn is better.
>> Anon 42345 First Time I ever posted here, but fuck it, this deserves a comment. CG porn exists, because real CP is harder to come by. Instead of seeking child porn, pedophiles use CG porn as an alternative. Now, if CG kiddy porn were to become illegal, they would again resume their efforts in finding the real thing, rather than extend the same amount of effort to find CG porn. This, in turn, would create (again) a higher demand for the real stuff, which would lead to more REAL CP being created. Do you morons understand? CG child porn is lessening the demand for the real stuff, which is causing underground groups to focus their attention on other things. IE Less kids are being kidnapped and/or abused, because fewer people are willing to pay for the real shit when the CG shit is legal, free, and easy to get. Every piece of shit that bitches about CG, think of it this way. If you DO manage to cause CG to become illegal, you just screwed (figuratively and literally) a bunch of kids. Feel good about yourselves? I fucking hope not....